These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21041556)

  • 1. Distinguishing positive selection from neutral evolution: boosting the performance of summary statistics.
    Lin K; Li H; Schlötterer C; Futschik A
    Genetics; 2011 Jan; 187(1):229-44. PubMed ID: 21041556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detecting Positive Selection in Populations Using Genetic Data.
    Koropoulis A; Alachiotis N; Pavlidis P
    Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2090():87-123. PubMed ID: 31975165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical power analysis of neutrality tests under demographic expansions, contractions and bottlenecks with recombination.
    Ramírez-Soriano A; Ramos-Onsins SE; Rozas J; Calafell F; Navarro A
    Genetics; 2008 May; 179(1):555-67. PubMed ID: 18493071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The pitfalls and virtues of population genetic summary statistics: Detecting selective sweeps in recent divergences.
    Schneider K; White TJ; Mitchell S; Adams CE; Reeve R; Elmer KR
    J Evol Biol; 2021 Jun; 34(6):893-909. PubMed ID: 33185292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection and Classification of Hard and Soft Sweeps from Unphased Genotypes by Multilocus Genotype Identity.
    Harris AM; Garud NR; DeGiorgio M
    Genetics; 2018 Dec; 210(4):1429-1452. PubMed ID: 30315068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detecting positive selection from genome scans of linkage disequilibrium.
    Huff CD; Harpending HC; Rogers AR
    BMC Genomics; 2010 Jan; 11():8. PubMed ID: 20051139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Soft shoulders ahead: spurious signatures of soft and partial selective sweeps result from linked hard sweeps.
    Schrider DR; Mendes FK; Hahn MW; Kern AD
    Genetics; 2015 May; 200(1):267-84. PubMed ID: 25716978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimal neutrality tests based on the frequency spectrum.
    Ferretti L; Perez-Enciso M; Ramos-Onsins S
    Genetics; 2010 Sep; 186(1):353-65. PubMed ID: 20610408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fully Bayesian tests of neutrality using genealogical summary statistics.
    Drummond AJ; Suchard MA
    BMC Genet; 2008 Oct; 9():68. PubMed ID: 18976476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An investigation of the statistical power of neutrality tests based on comparative and population genetic data.
    Zhai W; Nielsen R; Slatkin M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2009 Feb; 26(2):273-83. PubMed ID: 18922762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring the degree of starshape in genealogies--summary statistics and demographic inference.
    Lohse K; Kelleher J
    Genet Res (Camb); 2009 Aug; 91(4):281-92. PubMed ID: 19640323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The pattern of neutral molecular variation under the background selection model.
    Charlesworth D; Charlesworth B; Morgan MT
    Genetics; 1995 Dec; 141(4):1619-32. PubMed ID: 8601499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distinguishing between selective sweeps from standing variation and from a de novo mutation.
    Peter BM; Huerta-Sanchez E; Nielsen R
    PLoS Genet; 2012; 8(10):e1003011. PubMed ID: 23071458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new test for detecting recent positive selection that is free from the confounding impacts of demography.
    Li H
    Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Jan; 28(1):365-75. PubMed ID: 20709734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Enhancing the mathematical properties of new haplotype homozygosity statistics for the detection of selective sweeps.
    Garud NR; Rosenberg NA
    Theor Popul Biol; 2015 Jun; 102():94-101. PubMed ID: 25891325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detecting natural selection in RNA virus populations using sequence summary statistics.
    Bhatt S; Katzourakis A; Pybus OG
    Infect Genet Evol; 2010 Apr; 10(3):421-30. PubMed ID: 19524068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative phylogeographic summary statistics for testing simultaneous vicariance.
    Hickerson MJ; Dolman G; Moritz C
    Mol Ecol; 2006 Jan; 15(1):209-23. PubMed ID: 16367841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A survey of methods and tools to detect recent and strong positive selection.
    Pavlidis P; Alachiotis N
    J Biol Res (Thessalon); 2017 Dec; 24():7. PubMed ID: 28405579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three Signatures of Adaptive Polymorphism Exemplified by Malaria-Associated Genes.
    Tennessen JA; Duraisingh MT
    Mol Biol Evol; 2021 Apr; 38(4):1356-1371. PubMed ID: 33185667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hierarchical boosting: a machine-learning framework to detect and classify hard selective sweeps in human populations.
    Pybus M; Luisi P; Dall'Olio GM; Uzkudun M; Laayouni H; Bertranpetit J; Engelken J
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Dec; 31(24):3946-52. PubMed ID: 26315912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.