These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21041800)

  • 1. Spinal orthoses.
    Agabegi SS; Asghar FA; Herkowitz HN
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2010 Nov; 18(11):657-67. PubMed ID: 21041800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do cervical collars and cervicothoracic orthoses effectively stabilize the injured cervical spine? A biomechanical investigation.
    Ivancic PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):E767-74. PubMed ID: 23486409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spinal orthoses.
    Levine AM
    Am Fam Physician; 1984 Mar; 29(3):277-80. PubMed ID: 6230906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Role of Orthoses in Chronic Axial Spinal Conditions.
    Freeman J; Nikjou D; Maloney J; Covington S; Pew S; Wie C; Strand N; Abd-Elsayed A
    Curr Pain Headache Rep; 2024 Jun; 28(6):501-506. PubMed ID: 38407764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy of Thoracolumbar Bracing in Spinal Immobilization: Precise Assessment of Gross, Intersegmental, and Segmental Spinal Motion Restriction by a 3D Kinematic System.
    Lang G; Hirschmüller A; Patermann S; Eichelberger P; Strohm P; Baur H; Südkamp NP; Herget GW
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Aug; 116():e128-e146. PubMed ID: 29729467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of modified Boston brace for back injuries in athletes.
    Micheli LJ; Hall JE; Miller ME
    Am J Sports Med; 1980; 8(5):351-6. PubMed ID: 6448007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stabilization of 2-column thoracolumbar fractures with orthoses: a cadaver model.
    Rubery PT; Brown R; Prasarn M; Small J; Conrad B; Horodyski M; Rechtine G
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Mar; 38(5):E270-5. PubMed ID: 23211532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modern orthotics for spinal deformities.
    Winter RB; Carlson JM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1977; (126):74-86. PubMed ID: 598143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing range of motion to evaluate the adverse effects of ill-fitting cervical orthoses.
    Bell KM; Frazier EC; Shively CM; Hartman RA; Ulibarri JC; Lee JY; Kang JD; Donaldson WF
    Spine J; 2009 Mar; 9(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 18504164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Indications for the use of the halo immobilization.
    Kostuik JP
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1981; (154):46-50. PubMed ID: 7471588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reduction in head and intervertebral motion provided by 7 contemporary cervical orthoses in 45 individuals.
    Schneider AM; Hipp JA; Nguyen L; Reitman CA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan; 32(1):E1-6. PubMed ID: 17202874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. External spinal orthotics.
    Sypert GW
    Neurosurgery; 1987 Apr; 20(4):642-9. PubMed ID: 3295581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bracing and supporting of the lumbar spine.
    Schroeder S; Rössler H; Ziehe P; Higuchi F
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1982 Dec; 6(3):139-46. PubMed ID: 6218477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion.
    Willems P
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2013 Feb; 84(349):1-35. PubMed ID: 23427903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methods for evaluating cervical range of motion in trauma settings.
    Voss S; Page M; Benger J
    Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2012 Aug; 20():50. PubMed ID: 22856507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The orthotic treatment of acute and chronic disease of the cervical and lumbar spine.
    Zarghooni K; Beyer F; Siewe J; Eysel P
    Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2013 Nov; 110(44):737-42. PubMed ID: 24280429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of three different types of orthoses on the range of motion of the lumbar spine during 15 activities of daily living.
    Jegede KA; Miller CP; Bible JE; Whang PG; Grauer JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(26):2346-53. PubMed ID: 21358469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effectiveness of Adjustable Cervical Orthoses and Modular Cervical Thoracic Orthoses in Restricting Neck Motion: A Comparative In vivo Biomechanical Study.
    Gao F
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Oct; 40(19):E1046-51. PubMed ID: 26076435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Postoperative stabilization of the posttraumatic thoracic and lumbar spine: a review of concepts and orthotic techniques.
    Benzel EC; Larson SJ
    J Spinal Disord; 1989 Mar; 2(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 2520056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Postoperative Spinal Orthoses: Types and Outcomes.
    Donato Z; Gonzalez D; Markowitz M; Gjolaj J
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2024 Mar; 32(5):211-219. PubMed ID: 37812569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.