These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21041800)

  • 21. Tubular orthoses.
    Hannah RE; Foort J; Cooper DG
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1983 Dec; 7(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 6647012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The ability of external immobilizers to restrict movement of the cervical spine: a systematic review.
    Holla M; Huisman JM; Verdonschot N; Goosen J; Hosman AJ; Hannink G
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul; 25(7):2023-36. PubMed ID: 27032640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of 2 different thoracolumbar orthoses on the stability of the spine during various body movements.
    Kienle A; Saidi S; Oberst M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Aug; 38(17):E1082-9. PubMed ID: 23644685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The stabilizing effects of different orthoses in the intact and unstable upper cervical spine: a cadaver study.
    Richter D; Latta LL; Milne EL; Varkarakis GM; Biedermann L; Ekkernkamp A; Ostermann PA
    J Trauma; 2001 May; 50(5):848-54. PubMed ID: 11371840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Extrication collars can result in abnormal separation between vertebrae in the presence of a dissociative injury.
    Ben-Galim P; Dreiangel N; Mattox KL; Reitman CA; Kalantar SB; Hipp JA
    J Trauma; 2010 Aug; 69(2):447-50. PubMed ID: 20093981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prospective study of spinal orthoses in women.
    Dionyssiotis Y; Trovas G; Thoma S; Lyritis G; Papaioannou N
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Dec; 39(6):487-95. PubMed ID: 25138115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of cervical orthoses on neck biomechanical responses during transitioning from supine to upright.
    Ivancic PC
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2013 Mar; 28(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 23434342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Nonoperative management of vertical C2 body fractures.
    German JW; Hart BL; Benzel EC
    Neurosurgery; 2005 Mar; 56(3):516-21; discussion 516-21. PubMed ID: 15730577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparing cervical spine motion with different halo devices in a cadaveric cervical instability model.
    DiPaola CP; Sawers A; Conrad BP; Horodyski M; DiPaola MJ; Del Rossi G; Rechtine GR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 19139664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Three-dimensional spinal motion measurements. Part 2: A noninvasive assessment of lumbar brace immobilization of the spine.
    Buchalter D; Kahanovitz N; Viola K; Dorsky S; Nordin M
    J Spinal Disord; 1988; 1(4):284-6. PubMed ID: 2980256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cervical spine injuries in civilian victims of explosions: Should cervical collars be used?
    Klein Y; Arieli I; Sagiv S; Peleg K; Ben-Galim P
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2016 Jun; 80(6):985-8. PubMed ID: 26998779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Custom moulded plastic spinal orthoses.
    Turner MS; Carus DA; Troup IM
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1986 Aug; 10(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 2946023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effectiveness of three types of lumbar orthosis for restricting extension motion.
    Terai T; Yamada H; Asano K; Nawata A; Iwasaki T; Henmi T; Sairyo K
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2014 Jul; 24 Suppl 1():S239-43. PubMed ID: 24728780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The halo-Milwaukee brace. Case series of a revived technique.
    Godfried DH; Amory DW; Lubicky JP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Nov; 24(21):2273-7. PubMed ID: 10562996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A functional comparison of conventional knee-ankle-foot orthoses and a microprocessor-controlled leg orthosis system based on biomechanical parameters.
    Schmalz T; Pröbsting E; Auberger R; Siewert G
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Apr; 40(2):277-86. PubMed ID: 25249381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prehospital Cervical Spine Motion: Immobilization Versus Spine Motion Restriction.
    Swartz EE; Tucker WS; Nowak M; Roberto J; Hollingworth A; Decoster LC; Trimarco TW; Mihalik JP
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2018; 22(5):630-636. PubMed ID: 29452031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 14: brace therapy as an adjunct to or substitute for lumbar fusion.
    Resnick DK; Choudhri TF; Dailey AT; Groff MW; Khoo L; Matz PG; Mummaneni P; Watters WC; Wang J; Walters BC; Hadley MN;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Jun; 2(6):716-24. PubMed ID: 16028742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The efficacy of powered orthoses on walking in persons with paraplegia.
    Arazpour M; Hutchins SW; Ahmadi Bani M
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Apr; 39(2):90-9. PubMed ID: 24549210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An Indication-Based Concept for Stepwise Spinal Orthosis in Low Back Pain According to the Current Literature.
    Landauer F; Trieb K
    J Clin Med; 2022 Jan; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 35159962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A prospective study of the effect of foot orthoses composition and fabrication on comfort and the incidence of overuse injuries.
    Finestone A; Novack V; Farfel A; Berg A; Amir H; Milgrom C
    Foot Ankle Int; 2004 Jul; 25(7):462-6. PubMed ID: 15319103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.