415 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21041837)
1. Perceptions of Jordanian laypersons and dental professionals to altered smile aesthetics.
Abu Alhaija ES; Al-Shamsi NO; Al-Khateeb S
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):450-6. PubMed ID: 21041837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perception of smile esthetics among Indian dental professionals and laypersons.
Kumar S; Gandhi S; Valiathan A
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):295. PubMed ID: 22945732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perception differences of altered dental esthetics by dental professionals and laypersons.
Thomas M; Reddy R; Reddy BJ
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):242-7. PubMed ID: 21891893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons to altered dental esthetics: asymmetric and symmetric situations.
Kokich VO; Kokich VG; Kiyak HA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 16905057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of the gingival display on posed smile with different facial forms: a comparison of dentists and patients concepts.
Akhare PJ; Daga A
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 23422598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of maxillary canine gingival margin asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics among orthodontists and laypersons.
Correa BD; Vieira Bittencourt MA; Machado AW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 24373655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of symmetric and asymmetric alterations of maxillary canine gingival margin on the perception of smile esthetics among orthodontists, dentists, and laypersons.
Katiyar S; Gandhi S; Sodawala J; Anita G; Hamdani S; Jain S
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(6):586-591. PubMed ID: 28169254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of the perception of smile esthetics by laypersons, dental students and dental practitioners.
Cracel-Nogueira F; Pinho T
Int Orthod; 2013 Dec; 11(4):432-44. PubMed ID: 24427802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence on smile attractiveness of the smile arc in conjunction with gingival display.
Kaya B; Uyar R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Oct; 144(4):541-7. PubMed ID: 24075662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Smile esthetics from patients' perspectives for faces of varying attractiveness.
Chang CA; Fields HW; Beck FM; Springer NC; Firestone AR; Rosenstiel S; Christensen JC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):e171-80. PubMed ID: 21967955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of buccal corridor spaces and arch form on smile esthetics.
Roden-Johnson D; Gallerano R; English J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Mar; 127(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 15775949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of buccal corridors on smile attractiveness.
Martin AJ; Buschang PH; Boley JC; Taylor RW; McKinney TW
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):530-7. PubMed ID: 17974544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changes in smile parameters as perceived by orthodontists, dentists, artists, and laypeople.
Gul-e-Erum ; Fida M
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 18575307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Aesthetic evaluation of profile incisor inclination.
Ghaleb N; Bouserhal J; Bassil-Nassif N
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Jun; 33(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 20716642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perception of the esthetic impact of gingival smile on laypersons, dental professionals, and dental students.
Pithon MM; Santos AM; Viana de Andrade AC; Santos EM; Couto FS; da Silva Coqueiro R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Apr; 115(4):448-54. PubMed ID: 23022025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Smile microesthetics as perceived by dental professionals and laypersons.
Alomari SA; Alhaija ESA; AlWahadni AM; Al-Tawachi AK
Angle Orthod; 2022 Jan; 92(1):101-109. PubMed ID: 34520516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypeople to altered dental esthetics in cases with congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors.
Rosa M; Olimpo A; Fastuca R; Caprioglio A
Prog Orthod; 2013 Oct; 14():34. PubMed ID: 24325825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perception of general dentists and laypersons towards altered smile aesthetics.
Geevarghese A; Baskaradoss JK; Alsalem M; Aldahash A; Alfayez W; Alduhaimi T; Alehaideb A; Alsammahi O
J Orthod Sci; 2019; 8():14. PubMed ID: 31497573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Orthodontists' and laypeople's perception of smile height aesthetics in relation to varying degrees of transverse cant of anterior teeth.
Shiyan H; Xu Q; Shuhao X; Nanquan R; Xiaobing L
Aust Orthod J; 2016 May; 32(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 27468592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of dental asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics.
Pinho S; Ciriaco C; Faber J; Lenza MA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):748-53. PubMed ID: 18068592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
