186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21042034)
1. An introduction to instrumental variables--part 2: Mendelian randomisation.
Bennett DA
Neuroepidemiology; 2010; 35(4):307-10. PubMed ID: 21042034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of Mendelian randomisation to assess potential benefit of clinical intervention.
Burgess S; Butterworth A; Malarstig A; Thompson SG
BMJ; 2012 Nov; 345():e7325. PubMed ID: 23131671
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Adjusting for bias and unmeasured confounding in Mendelian randomization studies with binary responses.
Palmer TM; Thompson JR; Tobin MD; Sheehan NA; Burton PR
Int J Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 37(5):1161-8. PubMed ID: 18463132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mendelian randomization: use of genetics to enable causal inference in observational studies.
Verduijn M; Siegerink B; Jager KJ; Zoccali C; Dekker FW
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2010 May; 25(5):1394-8. PubMed ID: 20190244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mendelian randomization as an instrumental variable approach to causal inference.
Didelez V; Sheehan N
Stat Methods Med Res; 2007 Aug; 16(4):309-30. PubMed ID: 17715159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Two-stage instrumental variable methods for estimating the causal odds ratio: analysis of bias.
Cai B; Small DS; Have TR
Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(15):1809-24. PubMed ID: 21495062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An introduction to instrumental variables analysis: part 1.
Bennett DA
Neuroepidemiology; 2010; 35(3):237-40. PubMed ID: 20861655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On causation in therapeutic research: observational studies, randomised experiments and instrumental variable analysis.
Dekkers OM
Prev Med; 2011 Oct; 53(4-5):239-41. PubMed ID: 21864566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Severity of bias of a simple estimator of the causal odds ratio in Mendelian randomization studies.
Harbord RM; Didelez V; Palmer TM; Meng S; Sterne JA; Sheehan NA
Stat Med; 2013 Mar; 32(7):1246-58. PubMed ID: 23080538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interpretation of Mendelian randomization studies and the search for causal pathways in atherothrombosis: the need for caution.
Ridker PM; Paynter NP; Danik JS; Glynn RJ
Metab Syndr Relat Disord; 2010 Dec; 8(6):465-9. PubMed ID: 20818971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. An introduction to epidemiology.
Hajat C
Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 713():27-39. PubMed ID: 21153609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correction of confounding bias in non-randomized studies by appropriate weighting.
Schmoor C; Gall C; Stampf S; Graf E
Biom J; 2011 Mar; 53(2):369-87. PubMed ID: 21308726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mendelian randomisation: a tool for assessing causality in observational epidemiology.
Sheehan NA; Meng S; Didelez V
Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 713():153-66. PubMed ID: 21153618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk factors, confounding, and the illusion of statistical control.
Christenfeld NJ; Sloan RP; Carroll D; Greenland S
Psychosom Med; 2004; 66(6):868-75. PubMed ID: 15564351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mendelian randomization analysis of case-control data using structural mean models.
Bowden J; Vansteelandt S
Stat Med; 2011 Mar; 30(6):678-94. PubMed ID: 21337362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Mendelian randomisation - a genetic approach to an epidemiological method].
Stensrud MJ
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2016 Jun; 136(11):1002-5. PubMed ID: 27325033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Large-scale randomised trials--a misguided approach to clinical research.
Penston J
Med Hypotheses; 2005; 64(3):651-7. PubMed ID: 15617882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
Shrier I; Boivin JF; Steele RJ; Platt RW; Furlan A; Kakuma R; Brophy J; Rossignol M
Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 166(10):1203-9. PubMed ID: 17712019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Instrumental variables: application and limitations.
Martens EP; Pestman WR; de Boer A; Belitser SV; Klungel OH
Epidemiology; 2006 May; 17(3):260-7. PubMed ID: 16617274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Methods to adjust for bias and confounding in critical care health services research involving observational data.
Wunsch H; Linde-Zwirble WT; Angus DC
J Crit Care; 2006 Mar; 21(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16616616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
