These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21042105)

  • 1. Evaluation of skull strength following parietal bone graft harvest.
    Laure B; Tranquart F; Geais L; Goga D
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Nov; 126(5):1492-1499. PubMed ID: 21042105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanical characterization and optoelectronic measurement of parietal bone thickness before and after monocortical bone graft harvest: design and validation of a test protocol.
    Laure B; Geais L; Tranquart F; Goga D
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 22(1):113-7. PubMed ID: 21187767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Resistance of the sheep skull after a monocortical cranial graft harvest.
    Laure B; Petraud A; Sury F; Tranquart F; Goga D
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 40(3):261-5. PubMed ID: 21482129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative finite element analysis of skull mechanical properties following parietal bone graft harvesting in adults.
    Haen P; Dubois G; Goudot P; Schouman T
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Feb; 46(2):329-337. PubMed ID: 29233699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical comparison of calcium phosphate cements for split cranial bone graft donor sites.
    Nasir S; Porzel A; Pryor L; Zins JE
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Oct; 130(4):526e-534e. PubMed ID: 23018713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Regional thickness of parietal bone in Korean adults.
    Jung YS; Kim HJ; Choi SW; Kang JW; Cha IH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Dec; 32(6):638-41. PubMed ID: 14636616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences in biomechanical properties and thickness among frontal and parietal bones in a Japanese sample.
    Torimitsu S; Nishida Y; Takano T; Yajima D; Inokuchi G; Makino Y; Motomura A; Chiba F; Yamaguchi R; Hashimoto M; Hoshioka Y; Iwase H
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Jul; 252():190.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25998720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanics of temporo-parietal skull fracture.
    Yoganandan N; Pintar FA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2004 Mar; 19(3):225-39. PubMed ID: 15003337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Deformations and fractures of the human skull in impact testing of the temporal sulcus].
    Zech M
    Verh Anat Ges; 1978; (72):117-9. PubMed ID: 746689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical Studies on Patterns of Cranial Bone Fracture Using the Immature Porcine Model.
    Haut RC; Wei F
    J Biomech Eng; 2017 Feb; 139(2):. PubMed ID: 27537363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Minimally Invasive Cancellous Bone Graft Harvesting in Trauma Indication - Clinical Part of the Study].
    Látal P; Šperl J; Urban J; Štiková Z; Kloub M; Džupa V
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2020; 87(2):108-113. PubMed ID: 32396511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Postoperative pain following posterior iliac crest bone graft harvesting in spine surgery: a prospective, randomized trial.
    Sheha ED; Meredith DS; Shifflett GD; Bjerke BT; Iyer S; Shue J; Nguyen J; Huang RC
    Spine J; 2018 Jun; 18(6):986-992. PubMed ID: 29155001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dimensional analysis of the parietal bone in areas of surgical interest and relationship between parietal thickness and cephalic index.
    de Souza Fernandes AC; Neto AI; de Freitas AC; de Moraes M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 69(11):2930-5. PubMed ID: 21549491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retrospective evaluation of 211 patients with maxillofacial reconstruction using parietal bone graft for implants insertion.
    Depeyre A; Touzet-Roumazeille S; Lauwers L; Raoul G; Ferri J
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 44(9):1162-9. PubMed ID: 27502149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Case 10. Partial absorption of the parietal bone, arising from a blow on the head. 1816.
    Howship J
    Surg Neurol; 1994 Aug; 42(2):168-70. PubMed ID: 8091296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computed tomographic evaluation before cranial bone harvesting to avoid unexpected hazards during aesthetic procedures.
    Tellioğlu AT; Yilmaz S; Baydar S; Tekdemir I; Elhan AH
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2001; 25(3):198-201. PubMed ID: 11426313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A magnetic resonance imaging investigation of potential subclinical complications after in situ cranial bone graft harvest.
    Fearon JA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 May; 105(6):1935-9. PubMed ID: 10839389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of anterior and posterior iliac crest bone grafts in terms of harvest-site morbidity and functional outcomes.
    Ahlmann E; Patzakis M; Roidis N; Shepherd L; Holtom P
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 May; 84(5):716-20. PubMed ID: 12004011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical and histologic evaluation of the Norian craniofacial repair system and Norian Craniofacial Repair System Fast Set Putty in the long-term reconstruction of full-thickness skull defects in a sheep model.
    Zins JE; Moreira-Gonzalez A; Parikh A; Arslan E; Bauer T; Siemionow M
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 May; 121(5):271e-282e. PubMed ID: 18453939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Thickness map of parietal bone in Korean adults.
    Hwang K; Kim JH; Baik SH
    J Craniofac Surg; 1997 May; 8(3):208-12. PubMed ID: 9482068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.