202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21042777)
1. Comparison of MammaPrint and TargetPrint results with clinical parameters in German patients with early stage breast cancer.
Gevensleben H; Göhring UJ; Büttner R; Heukamp LC; Kunz G; Dimpfl T; Jackisch C; Ortmann O; Albert US; Bender R; De Snoo F; Krijgsman O; Glas AM; Ergönenc YH; Vogel C; Dykgers A; Langwieder C; Rees M; Anzeneder T
Int J Mol Med; 2010 Dec; 26(6):837-43. PubMed ID: 21042777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of molecular subtyping with BluePrint, MammaPrint, and TargetPrint to local clinical subtyping in breast cancer patients.
Nguyen B; Cusumano PG; Deck K; Kerlin D; Garcia AA; Barone JL; Rivera E; Yao K; de Snoo FA; van den Akker J; Stork-Sloots L; Generali D
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Oct; 19(10):3257-63. PubMed ID: 22965266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High concordance of protein (by IHC), gene (by FISH; HER2 only), and microarray readout (by TargetPrint) of ER, PgR, and HER2: results from the EORTC 10041/BIG 03-04 MINDACT trial.
Viale G; Slaets L; Bogaerts J; Rutgers E; Van't Veer L; Piccart-Gebhart MJ; de Snoo FA; Stork-Sloots L; Russo L; Dell'Orto P; van den Akker J; Glas A; Cardoso F;
Ann Oncol; 2014 Apr; 25(4):816-823. PubMed ID: 24667714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genomic profiling of breast cancer in African-American women using MammaPrint.
Nunes RA; Wray L; Mete M; Herbolsheimer P; Smith KL; Bijelic L; Boisvert ME; Swain SM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Oct; 159(3):481-8. PubMed ID: 27568021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microarray-based determination of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 receptor status in breast cancer.
Roepman P; Horlings HM; Krijgsman O; Kok M; Bueno-de-Mesquita JM; Bender R; Linn SC; Glas AM; van de Vijver MJ
Clin Cancer Res; 2009 Nov; 15(22):7003-11. PubMed ID: 19887485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An international study comparing conventional versus mRNA level testing (TargetPrint) for ER, PR, and HER2 status of breast cancer.
Wesseling J; Tinterri C; Sapino A; Zanconati F; Lutke-Holzik M; Nguyen B; Deck KB; Querzoli P; Perin T; Giardina C; Seitz G; Guinebretière JM; Barone J; Dekker L; de Snoo F; Stork-Sloots L; Roepman P; Watanabe T; Cusumano P
Virchows Arch; 2016 Sep; 469(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 27377889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Discordant assessment of tumor biomarkers by histopathological and molecular assays in the EORTC randomized controlled 10041/BIG 03-04 MINDACT trial breast cancer : Intratumoral heterogeneity and DCIS or normal tissue components are unlikely to be the cause of discordance.
Viale G; Slaets L; de Snoo FA; Bogaerts J; Russo L; van't Veer L; Rutgers EJ; Piccart-Gebhart MJ; Stork-Sloots L; Dell'Orto P; Glas AM; Cardoso F
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Feb; 155(3):463-9. PubMed ID: 26820652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Concordance of breast cancer biomarker status between routine immunohistochemistry/in situ hybridization and Oncotype DX qRT-PCR with investigation of discordance, a study of 591 cases.
Sechrist H; Glasgow A; Bomeisl P; Gilmore H; Harbhajanka A
Hum Pathol; 2020 Oct; 104():54-65. PubMed ID: 32758491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression in breast cancer: correlation with clinical pathological features.
Ning SF; Li JL; Luo CP; Wei CH; Lu YK; Liu HZ; Wei WE; Zhang LT
Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2014; 7(12):8740-7. PubMed ID: 25674240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing breast biomarker status between routine immunohistochemistry and FISH studies and Oncotype DX testing, a study of 610 cases.
Neely C; You S; Mendoza PM; Aneja R; Sahin AA; Li X
Breast J; 2018 Nov; 24(6):889-893. PubMed ID: 30230095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression in breast cancer FNA cell blocks and paired histologic specimens: A large retrospective study.
Vohra P; Buelow B; Chen YY; Serrano M; Vohra MS; Berry A; Ljung BM
Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 Nov; 124(11):828-835. PubMed ID: 27315045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Discordances in estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, and HER2 status between primary breast cancer and metastasis.
Curtit E; Nerich V; Mansi L; Chaigneau L; Cals L; Villanueva C; Bazan F; Montcuquet P; Meneveau N; Perrin S; Algros MP; Pivot X
Oncologist; 2013 Jun; 18(6):667-74. PubMed ID: 23723333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ER and PR immunohistochemistry and HER2 FISH versus oncotype DX: implications for breast cancer treatment.
Park MM; Ebel JJ; Zhao W; Zynger DL
Breast J; 2014; 20(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 24261318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparision of HER2/neu oncogene detected by chromogenic in-situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry in breast cancer].
Zhang GH; Shi DR; Liang XM; Hou JH; Kang SY; Zhu WD; Li XB; Shao Y; Chen LR; Zhou Y
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Oct; 35(10):580-3. PubMed ID: 17134562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Molecular subtyping of early-stage breast cancer identifies a group of patients who do not benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Glück S; de Snoo F; Peeters J; Stork-Sloots L; Somlo G
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2013 Jun; 139(3):759-67. PubMed ID: 23756626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High Ki-67 Expression and Low Progesterone Receptor Expression Could Independently Lead to a Worse Prognosis for Postmenopausal Patients With Estrogen Receptor-Positive and HER2-Negative Breast Cancer.
Nishimukai A; Yagi T; Yanai A; Miyagawa Y; Enomoto Y; Murase K; Imamura M; Takatsuka Y; Sakita I; Hatada T; Miyoshi Y
Clin Breast Cancer; 2015 Jun; 15(3):204-11. PubMed ID: 25600243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Molecular subtype profiling of invasive breast cancers weakly positive for estrogen receptor.
Sheffield BS; Kos Z; Asleh-Aburaya K; Wang XQ; Leung S; Gao D; Won J; Chow C; Rachamadugu R; Stijleman I; Wolber R; Gilks CB; Myles N; Thomson T; Hayes MM; Bernard PS; Nielsen TO; Chia SK
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Feb; 155(3):483-90. PubMed ID: 26846986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Brief fixation enables same-day breast cancer diagnosis with reliable assessment of hormone receptors, E-cadherin and HER2/Neu.
Halilovic A; Bulte J; Jacobs Y; Braam H; van Cleef P; Schlooz-Vries M; Werner A; Boelens O; Nagtegaal I; de Wilt H; Bult P
J Clin Pathol; 2017 Sep; 70(9):781-786. PubMed ID: 28325747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gene expression profiles of breast cancer obtained from core cut biopsies before neoadjuvant docetaxel, adriamycin, and cyclophoshamide chemotherapy correlate with routine prognostic markers and could be used to identify predictive signatures.
Rody A; Karn T; Gätje R; Kourtis K; Minckwitz G; Loibl S; Munnes M; Ruckhäberle E; Holtrich U; Kaufmann M; Ahr A
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2006 Apr; 128(2):76-81. PubMed ID: 16673249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Molecular subtyping improves diagnostic stratification of patients with primary breast cancer into prognostically defined risk groups.
Yao K; Goldschmidt R; Turk M; Wesseling J; Stork-Sloots L; de Snoo F; Cristofanilli M
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Nov; 154(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 26424167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
