204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21042950)
1. Estimation of mean arterial pressure from the oscillometric cuff pressure: comparison of different techniques.
Zheng D; Amoore JN; Mieke S; Murray A
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2011 Jan; 49(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 21042950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 17890968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements.
Amoore JN; Lemesre Y; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
J Hypertens; 2008 Jan; 26(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 18090538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Auscultatory versus oscillometric measurement of blood pressure in octogenarians.
Rosholm JU; Arnspang S; Matzen L; Jacobsen IA
Blood Press; 2012 Oct; 21(5):269-72. PubMed ID: 22545576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How important is the recommended slow cuff pressure deflation rate for blood pressure measurement?
Zheng D; Amoore JN; Mieke S; Murray A
Ann Biomed Eng; 2011 Oct; 39(10):2584-91. PubMed ID: 21735319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of automated oscillometric versus auscultatory blood pressure measurement.
Landgraf J; Wishner SH; Kloner RA
Am J Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 106(3):386-8. PubMed ID: 20643251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improved Measurement of Blood Pressure by Extraction of Characteristic Features from the Cuff Oscillometric Waveform.
Lim PK; Ng SC; Jassim WA; Redmond SJ; Zilany M; Avolio A; Lim E; Tan MP; Lovell NH
Sensors (Basel); 2015 Jun; 15(6):14142-61. PubMed ID: 26087370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Auscultatory versus oscillometric blood pressure measurement in patients with atrial fibrillation and arterial hypertension.
Šelmytė-Besusparė A; Barysienė J; Petrikonytė D; Aidietis A; Marinskis G; Laucevičius A
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2017 Mar; 17(1):87. PubMed ID: 28335730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Similarity between blood pressure values assessed by auscultatory method with mercury sphygmomanometer and automated oscillometric digital device.
Pavan MV; Saura GE; Korkes HA; Nascimento KM; Madeira Neto ND; Dávila R; Rodrigues CI; Almeida FA
J Bras Nefrol; 2012 Mar; 34(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 22441181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between oscillometric and auscultatory methods of ambulatory blood pressure measurement in hemodialysis patients.
Fagugli RM; Vecchi L; Valente F; Santirosi P; Laviola MM
Clin Nephrol; 2002 Apr; 57(4):283-8. PubMed ID: 12005244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can auscultatory blood pressure normative values be used for evaluation of oscillometric blood pressure in children?
Šuláková T; Šuláková A; Strnadel J; Pavlíček J; Obermannová B; Feber J
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2017 Apr; 19(4):381-387. PubMed ID: 28383188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes recorded from the locally compressed radial arteries.
Raamat R; Talts J; Jagomägi K; Kivastik J
Med Eng Phys; 2010 Dec; 32(10):1124-30. PubMed ID: 20833094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Systolic peak foot-to-apex time interval, a novel oscillometric technique for systolic blood pressure measurement.
Benmira AM; Perez-Martin A; Coudray S; Schuster I; Aichoun I; Laurent J; Bereski-Reguig F; Dauzat M
J Hypertens; 2017 May; 35(5):1002-1010. PubMed ID: 28099195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The agreement between oscillometric and intra-arterial technique for blood pressure monitoring in the lower extremities for infants and toddlers undergoing aortic coarctation repair.
Peng ZZ; Zhang MZ; Sun Y; Bai J; Gu HB; Liu PP; Li M; Cai MH
Paediatr Anaesth; 2016 Nov; 26(11):1091-1096. PubMed ID: 27543444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Significantly Reduced Blood Pressure Measurement Variability for Both Normotensive and Hypertensive Subjects: Effect of Polynomial Curve Fitting of Oscillometric Pulses.
Yang F; Chen F; Zhu M; Chen A; Zheng D
Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():5201069. PubMed ID: 28785580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical comparison of automated auscultatory and oscillometric and catheter-transducer measurements of arterial pressure.
Davis RF
J Clin Monit; 1985 Apr; 1(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 3831250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of mechanical behaviour of the brachial artery on blood pressure measurement during both cuff inflation and cuff deflation.
Zheng D; Pan F; Murray A
Blood Press Monit; 2013 Oct; 18(5):265-71. PubMed ID: 23924706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparability of oscillometric to simultaneous auscultatory blood pressure measurement in children.
Ringrose JS; Alabbas A; Jalali A; Khinda H; Morgan C; Yiu V; Alexander RT; Padwal R
Blood Press Monit; 2019 Apr; 24(2):83-88. PubMed ID: 30856623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparisons of an automated oscillometric device with a hybrid manual auscultatory device for the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
Kim YM; Park SH; Shin J; Sung KC; Ihm SH; Kim SH; Kim DH; Park SM; Cho IJ; Oh KW; Lee EM
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2024 May; 26(5):532-542. PubMed ID: 38552166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measurement of arm blood pressure using different oscillometry manometers compared to auscultatory readings.
Shahriari M; Rotenberg DK; Nielsen JK; Wiinberg N; Nielsen PE
Blood Press; 2003; 12(3):155-9. PubMed ID: 12875477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
