125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21043369)
1. Evaluation of patients' satisfaction of cervical ripening using dinoprostone by either intravaginal gel or pessary: an open-label, randomized, prospective study.
Ferraiolo A; Dellacasa I; Bentivoglio G; Ferrero S; Ragni N
J Reprod Med; 2010; 55(9-10):423-9. PubMed ID: 21043369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Induction of labor and pain: a randomized trial between two vaginal preparations of dinoprostone in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix.
Zanconato G; Bergamini V; Mantovani E; Carlin R; Bortolami O; Franchi M
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 May; 24(5):728-31. PubMed ID: 21351838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized controlled trial of 24-hour vaginal dinoprostone pessary compared to gel for induction of labor in term pregnancies with a Bishop score < or = 4.
Triglia MT; Palamara F; Lojacono A; Prefumo F; Frusca T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 May; 89(5):651-7. PubMed ID: 20199360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical ripening and induction of labor by prostaglandin E2: a comparison between intracervical gel and vaginal pessary.
D'Aniello G; Bocchi C; Florio P; Ignacchiti E; Guidoni CG; Centini G; Cito G; Picciolini E; Severi FM; Petraglia F
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2003 Sep; 14(3):158-62. PubMed ID: 14694970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of different doses of intravaginal misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Saxena P; Puri M; Bajaj M; Mishra A; Trivedi SS
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2011 Jul; 15(7):759-63. PubMed ID: 21780543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of extraamniotic Foley catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E gel for preinduction cervical ripening.
Dalui R; Suri V; Ray P; Gupta I
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Apr; 84(4):362-7. PubMed ID: 15762966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Uterine hyperstimulation following cervix ripening with dinoprostone in a vaginal insert system].
Veerman HM
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Jan; 149(2):105-6; author reply 106. PubMed ID: 15688844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Vaginal misoprostol in managing premature rupture of membranes.
Ayad IA
East Mediterr Health J; 2002; 8(4-5):515-20. PubMed ID: 15603033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A clinical evaluation of controlled-release dinoprostone for cervical ripening--a review of current evidence in hospital and outpatient settings.
Rath W
J Perinat Med; 2005; 33(6):491-9. PubMed ID: 16318611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Medical and mechanical methods for cervical ripening.
Biron-Shental T; Fishman A; Fejgin MD
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2004 May; 85(2):159-60. PubMed ID: 15099778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Clinical study on dinoprostone suppositories 0.8 mm used in cervical ripening and labor induction of women with term pregnancy of premature rupture of the membranes: a multicenter study].
Zou LY; Fan L; Duan T; Wang ZL; Ma RM
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Jul; 45(7):492-6. PubMed ID: 21029599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Elective cervical ripening in women beyond the 290th day of pregnancy: a randomized trial comparing 2 dinoprostone preparations.
Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Fazzio M; Volpe A
J Reprod Med; 2007 Oct; 52(10):945-9. PubMed ID: 17977171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pre-induction cervical ripening: comparing between two vaginal preparations of dinoprostone in women with an unfavorable cervix.
Ashwal E; Hiersch L; Melamed N; Manor Y; Wiznitzer A; Hod M; Yogev Y
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Dec; 27(18):1874-9. PubMed ID: 24417462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone.
Calder AA; Loughney AD; Weir CJ; Barber JW
BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1279-88. PubMed ID: 18715414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Neiger R; Greaves PC
Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [An open evaluation of prolonged-release dinoprostone with a retrieval system (a formulation of 1.1 MM) in unfavorable cervical ripening in the induction of labor for medical and obstetrical indications].
Moreno García JD; Márquez Becerra MA; Reyes Compain Ydel C; Juárez Azpilcueta AA
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1999 Jul; 67():302-7. PubMed ID: 10496051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Cervical ripening and induction of labor in term pregnancy using prostaglandin E2. Controlled clinical study comparing the intracervical and intravaginal routes].
Zanini A; Norchi S; Beretta E; Cortinovis I; Fenaroli G; Scian A
Ann Ostet Ginecol Med Perinat; 1989; 110(5):209-16. PubMed ID: 2634922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Induction of labour: a comparison between controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal pessary (Cervidil) and dinoprostone intravaginal gel (Prostin E2).
Kho EM; Sadler L; McCowan L
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Oct; 48(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 19032662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of extending dinoprostone pessary placement from 12 to 24 h on the need for further mechanical cervical ripening.
Lusink V; Usher L; Day T
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Dec; 54(6):586-8. PubMed ID: 24862875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
