These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Stem Cell Differentiation Stage Factors and their Role in Triggering Symmetry Breaking Processes during Cancer Development: A Quantum Field Theory Model for Reprogramming Cancer Cells to Healthy Phenotypes. Biava PM; Burigana F; Germano R; Kurian P; Verzegnassi C; Vitiello G Curr Med Chem; 2019; 26(6):988-1001. PubMed ID: 28933288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mechanical induction in embryonic development and tumor growth integrative cues through molecular to multicellular interplay and evolutionary perspectives. Fernandez-Sanchez ME; Serman F; Ahmadi P; Farge E Methods Cell Biol; 2010; 98():295-321. PubMed ID: 20816239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The phenotypic reversion of cancer: Experimental evidences on cancer reversibility through epigenetic mechanisms (Review). Pensotti A; Bizzarri M; Bertolaso M Oncol Rep; 2024 Mar; 51(3):. PubMed ID: 38275101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cancer attractors: a systems view of tumors from a gene network dynamics and developmental perspective. Huang S; Ernberg I; Kauffman S Semin Cell Dev Biol; 2009 Sep; 20(7):869-76. PubMed ID: 19595782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Morphogenetic fields of embryonic development in locoregional cancer spread. Höckel M Lancet Oncol; 2015 Mar; 16(3):e148-51. PubMed ID: 25752565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. BMP receptor IA is required in the mammalian embryo for endodermal morphogenesis and ectodermal patterning. Davis S; Miura S; Hill C; Mishina Y; Klingensmith J Dev Biol; 2004 Jun; 270(1):47-63. PubMed ID: 15136140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Morphogenetic fields in embryogenesis, regeneration, and cancer: non-local control of complex patterning. Levin M Biosystems; 2012 Sep; 109(3):243-61. PubMed ID: 22542702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tumor and the microenvironment: a chance to reframe the paradigm of carcinogenesis? Bizzarri M; Cucina A Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():934038. PubMed ID: 25013812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Field homology as a way to reconcile genetic and developmental variability with adult homology. Puelles L; Medina L Brain Res Bull; 2002 Feb-Mar 1; 57(3-4):243-55. PubMed ID: 11922968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is Cancer Reversible? Rethinking Carcinogenesis Models-A New Epistemological Tool. Pensotti A; Bertolaso M; Bizzarri M Biomolecules; 2023 Apr; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 37238604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Suppression of endogenous lipogenesis induces reversion of the malignant phenotype and normalized differentiation in breast cancer. Gonzalez-Guerrico AM; Espinoza I; Schroeder B; Park CH; Kvp CM; Khurana A; Corominas-Faja B; Cuyàs E; Alarcón T; Kleer C; Menendez JA; Lupu R Oncotarget; 2016 Nov; 7(44):71151-71168. PubMed ID: 27223424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Single cell genomics reveals activation signatures of endogenous SCAR's networks in aneuploid human embryos and clinically intractable malignant tumors. Glinsky GV Cancer Lett; 2016 Oct; 381(1):176-93. PubMed ID: 27497790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Self-organizing potential and morphogenetic potential (comparing current embryological and Atlan's views). Bernier R Acta Biotheor; 1986; 35(3):163-83. PubMed ID: 3092522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]