305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21044170)
1. Vertical palatal bone dimensions on lateral cephalometry and cone-beam computed tomography: implications for palatal implant placement.
Jung BA; Wehrbein H; Heuser L; Kunkel M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Jun; 22(6):664-8. PubMed ID: 21044170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Anatomical assessment by cone beam computed tomography with the use of lateral cephalograms to analyse the vertical bone height of the anterior palate for orthodontic mini-implants.
Möhlhenrich SC; Kniha K; Peters F; Chhatwani S; Prescher A; Hölzle F; Modabber A; Danesh G
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 Feb; 24(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 32608152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preoperative diagnostic for palatal implants: Is CT or CBCT necessary?
Jung BA; Wehrbein H; Wagner W; Kunkel M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Jun; 14(3):400-5. PubMed ID: 20132245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implant treatment planning regarding augmentation procedures: panoramic radiographs vs. cone beam computed tomography images.
Dagassan-Berndt DC; Zitzmann NU; Walter C; Schulze RK
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Aug; 27(8):1010-6. PubMed ID: 26227397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three dimensional anatomical exploration of the anterior hard palate at the level of the third ruga for the placement of mini-implants--a cone-beam CT study.
Hourfar J; Kanavakis G; Bister D; Schätzle M; Awad L; Nienkemper M; Goldbecher C; Ludwig B
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Dec; 37(6):589-95. PubMed ID: 25564503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vertical measurements for planning palatal mini-implants in lateral radiography and cone beam computed tomography.
de Rezende Barbosa GL; Ramírez-Sotelo LR; Távora Dde M; de Almeida SM
Implant Dent; 2014 Oct; 23(5):588-92. PubMed ID: 25192163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of cephalometric measurements and cone-beam computed tomography-based measurements of palatal bone thickness.
Kim YJ; Lim SH; Gang SN
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 24485730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of median and paramedian regions for planning palatal mini-implants: a study in vivo using cone beam computed tomography.
de Rezende Barbosa GL; Ramírez-Sotelo LR; Távora DM; Almeida SM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 43(10):1265-8. PubMed ID: 24846198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls.
van Vlijmen OJ; Maal TJ; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19583759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Panoramic images versus three-dimensional planning software for oral implant planning in atrophied posterior maxillary: a clinical radiological study.
Fortin T; Camby E; Alik M; Isidori M; Bouchet H
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21477064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The evaluation of palatal bone thickness for implant insertion with cone beam computed tomography.
Sumer AP; Caliskan A; Uzun C; Karoz TB; Sumer M; Cankaya S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Feb; 45(2):216-20. PubMed ID: 26458537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Evaluation of the implant sites of palatal implants using cone beam computed tomography].
Zou H; Lai RF; Kong WD; Lin W; Chen MY
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Jul; 44(7):404-8. PubMed ID: 19957572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurements on 3D models of human skulls derived from two different cone beam CT scanners.
van Vlijmen OJ; Rangel FA; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Becking AG; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Oct; 15(5):721-7. PubMed ID: 20640463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Palatal bone dimensions on cone beam computed tomography. Implications for the palate as autogenous donor site: an observational study.
El Nahass H; Naiem SN
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jan; 45(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 26443273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictive factors of vertical bone depth in the paramedian palate of adolescents.
King KS; Lam EW; Faulkner MG; Heo G; Major PW
Angle Orthod; 2006 Sep; 76(5):745-51. PubMed ID: 17029505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Morphology of the nasopalatine canal and dental implant surgery: a radiographic analysis of 100 consecutive patients using limited cone-beam computed tomography.
Bornstein MM; Balsiger R; Sendi P; von Arx T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Mar; 22(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 21039896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The nasopalatine canal, a limiting factor for temporary anchorage devices: a cone beam computed tomography data study.
Tilen R; Patcas R; Bornstein MM; Ludwig B; Schätzle M
Eur J Orthod; 2017 Nov; 39(6):646-653. PubMed ID: 28379399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Palatal bone thickness compared with cone-beam computed tomography in adolescents and adults for mini-implant placement.
Ryu JH; Park JH; Vu Thi Thu T; Bayome M; Kim Y; Kook YA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 22858330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Novel information theory based method for superimposition of lateral head radiographs and cone beam computed tomography images.
Jacquet W; Nyssen E; Bottenberg P; de Groen P; Vande Vannet B
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 May; 39(4):191-8. PubMed ID: 20395459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of dentoskeletal changes after asymmetric rapid maxillary expansion.
Baka ZM; Akin M; Ucar FI; Ileri Z
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jan; 147(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 25533073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
