These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21044501)

  • 1. Effect of arousal increase in predictable and random task switching: evidence for the involvement of the anterior attentional network in random but not in predictable task switching.
    Solano Galvis CA; Tornay Mejías F; Gómez Milán E
    Psicothema; 2010 Nov; 22(4):703-7. PubMed ID: 21044501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A more complete task-set reconfiguration in random than in predictable task switch.
    Tornay FJ; Milán EG
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Aug; 54(3):785-803. PubMed ID: 11548035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploring task-set reconfiguration with random task sequences.
    Milán EG; Sanabria D; Tornay F; González A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Mar; 118(3):319-31. PubMed ID: 15698827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The nature of residual cost in regular switch response factors.
    Milán EG; González A; Sanabria D; Pereda A; Hochel M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 May; 122(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 16310155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Asymmetric switch cost and backward inhibition: Carryover activation and inhibition in switching between tasks of unequal difficulty.
    Arbuthnott KD
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2008 Jun; 62(2):91-100. PubMed ID: 18572986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrophysiological correlates of residual switch costs.
    Gajewski PD; Kleinsorge T; Falkenstein M
    Cortex; 2010 Oct; 46(9):1138-48. PubMed ID: 19717147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Arousal and attention: self-chosen stimulation optimizes cortical excitability and minimizes compensatory effort.
    Fischer T; Langner R; Birbaumer N; Brocke B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Aug; 20(8):1443-53. PubMed ID: 18303981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attention switching after dietary brain 5-HT challenge in high impulsive subjects.
    Markus CR; Jonkman LM
    J Psychopharmacol; 2007 Sep; 21(7):700-8. PubMed ID: 17606474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of normal aging and Parkinson's disease on response preparation in task-switching behavior.
    Witt K; Daniels C; Schmitt-Eliassen J; Kernbichler J; Rehm S; Volkmann J; Deuschl G
    Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1114(1):173-82. PubMed ID: 16920086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distinguishing between inhibitory and episodic processing accounts of switch-cost asymmetries.
    Wong J; Leboe JP
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Mar; 63(1):8-23. PubMed ID: 19271811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pre-stimulus EEG effects related to response speed, task switching and upcoming response hand.
    Gladwin TE; Lindsen JP; de Jong R
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Apr; 72(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 16169147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Task-set switching under cue-based versus memory-based switching conditions in younger and older adults.
    Kray J
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 16387284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Task-set switching deficits in early-stage Huntington's disease: implications for basal ganglia function.
    Aron AR; Watkins L; Sahakian BJ; Monsell S; Barker RA; Robbins TW
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Jul; 15(5):629-42. PubMed ID: 12965037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fractionating the cognitive control required to bring about a change in task: a dense-sensor event-related potential study.
    Astle DE; Jackson GM; Swainson R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 20(2):255-67. PubMed ID: 18275333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of 40 h constant wakefulness on task-switching efficiency.
    Bratzke D; Rolke B; Steinborn MB; Ulrich R
    J Sleep Res; 2009 Jun; 18(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 19645962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Task switching and novelty processing activate a common neural network for cognitive control.
    Barcelo F; Escera C; Corral MJ; Periáñez JA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Oct; 18(10):1734-48. PubMed ID: 17014377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of associative learning on age differences in task-set switching.
    Kray J; Eppinger B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Nov; 123(3):187-203. PubMed ID: 16564483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of recent practice on task switching.
    Yeung N; Monsell S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):919-36. PubMed ID: 14585014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Short cue presentations encourage advance task preparation: a recipe to diminish the residual switch cost.
    Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A; Demanet J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):342-56. PubMed ID: 17352616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Task alternation cost without task alternation: measuring intentionality.
    Yehene E; Meiran N; Soroker N
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(13):1858-69. PubMed ID: 16168729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.