These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21044553)

  • 1. A systematic review of positron emission tomography (PET) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the diagnosis of breast cancer recurrence.
    Pennant M; Takwoingi Y; Pennant L; Davenport C; Fry-Smith A; Eisinga A; Andronis L; Arvanitis T; Deeks J; Hyde C
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 Oct; 14(50):1-103. PubMed ID: 21044553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ultrasound, CT, MRI, or PET-CT for staging and re-staging of adults with cutaneous melanoma.
    Dinnes J; Ferrante di Ruffano L; Takwoingi Y; Cheung ST; Nathan P; Matin RN; Chuchu N; Chan SA; Durack A; Bayliss SE; Gulati A; Patel L; Davenport C; Godfrey K; Subesinghe M; Traill Z; Deeks JJ; Williams HC;
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Jul; 7(7):CD012806. PubMed ID: 31260100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Positron emission tomography/computerised tomography imaging in detecting and managing recurrent cervical cancer: systematic review of evidence, elicitation of subjective probabilities and economic modelling.
    Meads C; Auguste P; Davenport C; Małysiak S; Sundar S; Kowalska M; Zapalska A; Guest P; Thangaratinam S; Martin-Hirsch P; Borowiack E; Barton P; Roberts T; Khan K
    Health Technol Assess; 2013 Mar; 17(12):1-323. PubMed ID: 23537558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An economic evaluation of positron emission tomography (PET) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the diagnosis of breast cancer recurrence.
    Auguste P; Barton P; Hyde C; Roberts TE
    Health Technol Assess; 2011 Apr; 15(18):iii-iv, 1-54. PubMed ID: 21524363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Imaging tests for the detection of osteomyelitis: a systematic review.
    Llewellyn A; Jones-Diette J; Kraft J; Holton C; Harden M; Simmonds M
    Health Technol Assess; 2019 Oct; 23(61):1-128. PubMed ID: 31670644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of axillary lymph node metastases in early breast cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Cooper KL; Meng Y; Harnan S; Ward SE; Fitzgerald P; Papaioannou D; Wyld L; Ingram C; Wilkinson ID; Lorenz E
    Health Technol Assess; 2011 Jan; 15(4):iii-iv, 1-134. PubMed ID: 21276372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The value of FDG positron emission tomography/computerised tomography (PET/CT) in pre-operative staging of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Brush J; Boyd K; Chappell F; Crawford F; Dozier M; Fenwick E; Glanville J; McIntosh H; Renehan A; Weller D; Dunlop M
    Health Technol Assess; 2011 Sep; 15(35):1-192, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 21958472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 123I-MIBG scintigraphy and 18F-FDG-PET imaging for diagnosing neuroblastoma.
    Bleeker G; Tytgat GA; Adam JA; Caron HN; Kremer LC; Hooft L; van Dalen EC
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Sep; 2015(9):CD009263. PubMed ID: 26417712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison between the diagnostic accuracies of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography and conventional imaging in recurrent urothelial carcinomas: a retrospective, multicenter study.
    Zattoni F; Incerti E; Colicchia M; Castellucci P; Panareo S; Picchio M; Fallanca F; Briganti A; Moschini M; Gallina A; Karnes JR; Lowe V; Fanti S; Schiavina R; Rambaldi I; Ficarra V; Evangelista L
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Sep; 43(9):2391-2399. PubMed ID: 29302738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Tumor Staging in Patients With Primary Breast Cancer: A Comparison With Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Grueneisen J; Nagarajah J; Buchbender C; Hoffmann O; Schaarschmidt BM; Poeppel T; Forsting M; Quick HH; Umutlu L; Kinner S
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):505-13. PubMed ID: 26115367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating PET-CT in the detection and management of recurrent cervical cancer: systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy and subjective elicitation.
    Meads C; Davenport C; Małysiak S; Kowalska M; Zapalska A; Guest P; Martin-Hirsch P; Borowiack E; Auguste P; Barton P; Roberts T; Khan K; Sundar S
    BJOG; 2014 Mar; 121(4):398-407. PubMed ID: 24299154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging versus bone scintigraphy for clinically suspected scaphoid fractures in patients with negative plain radiographs.
    Mallee WH; Wang J; Poolman RW; Kloen P; Maas M; de Vet HC; Doornberg JN
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Jun; 2015(6):CD010023. PubMed ID: 26045406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the diagnostic efficiency for local recurrence of rectal cancer using CT, MRI, PET and PET-CT: A systematic review protocol.
    Shao H; Ma X; Gao Y; Wang J; Wu J; Wang B; Li J; Tian J
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Nov; 97(48):e12900. PubMed ID: 30508883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
    Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of Positron Emission Tomography and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Using Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose for the Diagnosis, Staging, and Recurrence Assessment of Bone Sarcoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Liu F; Zhang Q; Zhu D; Liu F; Li Z; Li J; Wang B; Zhou D; Dong J
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Sep; 94(36):e1462. PubMed ID: 26356700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Computed Tomography (CT) in Suspected Recurrent Breast Cancer: A Prospective Comparative Study of Dual-Time-Point FDG-PET/CT, Contrast-Enhanced CT, and Bone Scintigraphy.
    Hildebrandt MG; Gerke O; Baun C; Falch K; Hansen JA; Farahani ZA; Petersen H; Larsen LB; Duvnjak S; Buskevica I; Bektas S; Søe K; Jylling AM; Ewertz M; Alavi A; Høilund-Carlsen PF
    J Clin Oncol; 2016 Jun; 34(16):1889-97. PubMed ID: 27001573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Functional brain imaging: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2006; 6(22):1-79. PubMed ID: 23074493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. FDG-PET and other imaging modalities for the evaluation of breast cancer recurrence and metastases: a meta-analysis.
    Pan L; Han Y; Sun X; Liu J; Gang H
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2010 Jul; 136(7):1007-22. PubMed ID: 20091186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. FDG-PET/CT and MRI for Evaluation of Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.
    Sheikhbahaei S; Trahan TJ; Xiao J; Taghipour M; Mena E; Connolly RM; Subramaniam RM
    Oncologist; 2016 Aug; 21(8):931-9. PubMed ID: 27401897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 62.