These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21044608)

  • 1. Cross-validating FRAP and FCS to quantify the impact of photobleaching on in vivo binding estimates.
    Stasevich TJ; Mueller F; Michelman-Ribeiro A; Rosales T; Knutson JR; McNally JG
    Biophys J; 2010 Nov; 99(9):3093-101. PubMed ID: 21044608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diffusion and binding analyzed with combined point FRAP and FCS.
    Im KB; Schmidt U; Kang MS; Lee JY; Bestvater F; Wachsmuth M
    Cytometry A; 2013 Sep; 83(9):876-89. PubMed ID: 23847177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative FRAP in analysis of molecular binding dynamics in vivo.
    McNally JG
    Methods Cell Biol; 2008; 85():329-51. PubMed ID: 18155469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamics of the CapG actin-binding protein in the cell nucleus studied by FRAP and FCS.
    Renz M; Langowski J
    Chromosome Res; 2008; 16(3):427-37. PubMed ID: 18461482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A quantitative approach to analyze binding diffusion kinetics by confocal FRAP.
    Kang M; Day CA; DiBenedetto E; Kenworthy AK
    Biophys J; 2010 Nov; 99(9):2737-47. PubMed ID: 21044570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. EGF Receptor Stalls upon Activation as Evidenced by Complementary Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Recovery after Photobleaching Measurements.
    Vámosi G; Friedländer-Brock E; Ibrahim SM; Brock R; Szöllősi J; Vereb G
    Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Jul; 20(13):. PubMed ID: 31323980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analyses of the Dynamic Properties of Nuclear Lamins by Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP) and Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy (FCS).
    Takeshi S; Pack CG; Goldman RD
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1411():99-111. PubMed ID: 27147036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Direct measurement of association and dissociation rates of DNA binding in live cells by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy.
    Michelman-Ribeiro A; Mazza D; Rosales T; Stasevich TJ; Boukari H; Rishi V; Vinson C; Knutson JR; McNally JG
    Biophys J; 2009 Jul; 97(1):337-46. PubMed ID: 19580772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Monitoring dynamic binding of chromatin proteins in vivo by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching.
    Mueller F; Karpova TS; Mazza D; McNally JG
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 833():153-76. PubMed ID: 22183594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discrepancy between fluorescence correlation spectroscopy and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching diffusion measurements of G-protein-coupled receptors.
    Calizo RC; Scarlata S
    Anal Biochem; 2013 Sep; 440(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 23748145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the Equivalence of FCS and FRAP: Simultaneous Lipid Membrane Measurements.
    Macháň R; Foo YH; Wohland T
    Biophys J; 2016 Jul; 111(1):152-61. PubMed ID: 27410743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of binding at a single spatially localized cluster of binding sites by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching.
    Sprague BL; Müller F; Pego RL; Bungay PM; Stavreva DA; McNally JG
    Biophys J; 2006 Aug; 91(4):1169-91. PubMed ID: 16679358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A benchmark for chromatin binding measurements in live cells.
    Mazza D; Abernathy A; Golob N; Morisaki T; McNally JG
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2012 Aug; 40(15):e119. PubMed ID: 22844090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimizing the impact of photoswitching of fluorescent proteins on FRAP analysis.
    Mueller F; Morisaki T; Mazza D; McNally JG
    Biophys J; 2012 Apr; 102(7):1656-65. PubMed ID: 22500766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of binding reactions by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching.
    Sprague BL; Pego RL; Stavreva DA; McNally JG
    Biophys J; 2004 Jun; 86(6):3473-95. PubMed ID: 15189848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Photoswitching-free FRAP analysis with a genetically encoded fluorescent tag.
    Morisaki T; McNally JG
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e107730. PubMed ID: 25233348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identification of biomolecule mass transport and binding rate parameters in living cells by inverse modeling.
    Sadegh Zadeh K; Montas HJ; Shirmohammadi A
    Theor Biol Med Model; 2006 Oct; 3():36. PubMed ID: 17034642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Messages do diffuse faster than messengers: reconciling disparate estimates of the morphogen bicoid diffusion coefficient.
    Sigaut L; Pearson JE; Colman-Lerner A; Ponce Dawson S
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2014 Jun; 10(6):e1003629. PubMed ID: 24901638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching.
    Carisey A; Stroud M; Tsang R; Ballestrem C
    Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 769():387-402. PubMed ID: 21748690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of photobleaching for measuring diffusion of prion proteins in cytosol of yeast cells.
    Wu YX; Masison DC; Eisenberg E; Greene LE
    Methods; 2006 May; 39(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 16793282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.