136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21045013)
21. Is pulmonary vein antrum isolation a critical determinant of recurrent arrhythmias after ablation of atrial fibrillation?
Lindsay BD
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Aug; 50(9):875-6. PubMed ID: 17719474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Remote magnetic ablation of atrial fibrillation is safe and feasible in the presence of a left atrial appendage closure device.
Bun SS; Latcu DG; Saoudi N
Europace; 2014 Apr; 16(4):476. PubMed ID: 24158258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Feasibility and safety of remote-controlled magnetic navigation for ablation of atrial fibrillation.
Katsiyiannis WT; Melby DP; Matelski JL; Ervin VL; Laverence KL; Gornick CC
Am J Cardiol; 2008 Dec; 102(12):1674-6. PubMed ID: 19064022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Magnetic navigation for ablation of cardiac arrhythmias].
Chen J; Hoff PI; Solheim E; Schuster P; Off MK; Ohm OJ
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2010 Aug; 130(15):1467-70. PubMed ID: 20706307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Atrial fibrillation ablation by aortic retrograde approach using a magnetic navigation system.
Miyazaki S; Nault I; Haïssaguerre M; Hocini M
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2010 Apr; 21(4):455-7. PubMed ID: 20021516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Stereotaxis Niobe magnetic navigation system for endocardial catheter ablation and gastrointestinal capsule endoscopy.
Carpi F; Pappone C
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2009 Sep; 6(5):487-98. PubMed ID: 19751121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [New strategies for interventional and surgical therapy of atrial fibrillation].
Willems S; Doll N; Steven D; Czesla M; Hoffmann B; Weimar T
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2012 Sep; 137(39):1916-24. PubMed ID: 22996579
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Persistence of pulmonary vein isolation after robotic remote-navigated ablation for atrial fibrillation and its relation to clinical outcome.
Willems S; Steven D; Servatius H; Hoffmann BA; Drewitz I; Müllerleile K; Aydin MA; Wegscheider K; Salukhe TV; Meinertz T; Rostock T
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2010 Oct; 21(10):1079-84. PubMed ID: 20455974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Experience with the hansen robotic system for atrial fibrillation ablation--lessons learned and techniques modified: Hansen in the real world.
Wazni OM; Barrett C; Martin DO; Shaheen M; Tarakji K; Baranowski B; Hussein A; Callahan T; Dresing T; Bhargava M; Kanj M; Tchou P; Natale A; Saliba W
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1193-6. PubMed ID: 19572952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Mitral isthmus ablation using a remote robotic catheter system may not be as safe as reported.
McGavigan AD
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2014 Jan; 37(1):128. PubMed ID: 23992482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The future of atrial fibrillation ablation: new technologies and indications: atrial fibrillation.
Ernst S
Heart; 2009 Feb; 95(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 19109519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Magnetic navigation and catheter ablation of right atrial ectopic tachycardia in the presence of a hemi-azygos continuation: a magnetic navigation case using 3D electroanatomical mapping.
Ernst S; Chun JK; Koektuerk B; Kuck KH
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2009 Jan; 20(1):99-102. PubMed ID: 18662184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Impact of remote magnetic catheter navigation on ablation fluoroscopy and procedure time.
Kim AM; Turakhia M; Lu J; Badhwar N; Lee BK; Lee RJ; Marcus GM; Tseng ZH; Scheinman M; Olgin JE
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 Nov; 31(11):1399-404. PubMed ID: 18950296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Remote controlled robot assisted cardiac navigation: feasibility assessment and validation in a porcine model.
Ganji Y; Janabi-Sharifi F; Cheema AN
Int J Med Robot; 2011 Dec; 7(4):489-95. PubMed ID: 22113981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Initial experience with a novel remote-guided magnetic catheter navigation system for left ventricular scar mapping and ablation in a porcine model of healed myocardial infarction.
Ray IB; Dukkipati S; Houghtaling C; McPherson CD; Kastelein N; Ruskin JN; Reddy VY
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2007 May; 18(5):520-5. PubMed ID: 17388912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. High-tech catheter ablation: worth the cost?
Chevalier P
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2009 May; 102(5):381-3. PubMed ID: 19520322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Can we improve upon human performance in the electrophysiology laboratory?
Callans DJ
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Jun; 51(25):2412-3. PubMed ID: 18565398
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Remote magnetic navigation for persistent atrial fibrillation ablation via a retrograde aortic access: an approach for patients after atrial septal defect device closure.
Buiatti A; Hessling G; Semmler V; Ammar S
Clin Res Cardiol; 2014 Dec; 103(12):1028-30. PubMed ID: 25085268
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Minimally invasive atrial fibrillation ablation combined with a new technique for thoracoscopic stapling of the left atrial appendage: case report.
Balkhy HH; Chapman PD; Arnsdorf SE
Heart Surg Forum; 2004; 7(6):353-5. PubMed ID: 15769703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Very low fluoroscopy ablation for atrial fibrillation can be fast and safe.
Ferguson JD
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2014 Oct; 7(5):777-8. PubMed ID: 25336362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
