These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21045102)

  • 1. Substituted interests and best judgments: an integrated model of surrogate decision making.
    Sulmasy DP; Snyder L
    JAMA; 2010 Nov; 304(17):1946-7. PubMed ID: 21045102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Facebook can improve surrogate decision making.
    Pope TM
    Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):43-5. PubMed ID: 22974034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Considerations in surrogate decision making in the internet age.
    Tsai NT
    Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):51. PubMed ID: 22974038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are we prepared for surrogate decision making in the internet age?
    Moore JA; Gallagher CM
    Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):47-9. PubMed ID: 22974036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A disability response to surrogate decision making in the internet age.
    Burke TB
    Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):36-7. PubMed ID: 22974030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surrogate decision making 2.0: digital evidence as clinical testimony.
    Wahlert L
    Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):34-6. PubMed ID: 22974029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Claims about surrogate decision-making accuracy require empirical evidence.
    Feltz A; Abt T
    Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):41-3. PubMed ID: 22974033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patients' interests in their family members' well-being: an overlooked, fundamental consideration within substituted judgments.
    Berger JT
    J Clin Ethics; 2005; 16(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 15915841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response to open peer commentaries on "Surrogate decision making in the internet age".
    Berg J
    Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):W1-2. PubMed ID: 22974042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can P4 Support Family Involvement and Best Interests in Surrogate Decision-Making?
    Ballantyne A; Style R
    Am J Bioeth; 2024 Jul; 24(7):56-58. PubMed ID: 38913457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patients' concerns for family burden: a nonconforming preference in standards for surrogate decision making.
    Berger JT
    J Clin Ethics; 2009; 20(2):158-61. PubMed ID: 19554821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surrogate decision making in the internet age.
    Berg J
    Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):28-33. PubMed ID: 22974028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Social media as a contributor to substituted judgment: the hazards outweigh the value.
    Sadovnikoff N; Jurchak M
    Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):45-7. PubMed ID: 22974035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Health care surrogate statutes: ethics pitfalls threaten the interests of incompetent patients.
    Krupp AN
    West VA Law Rev; 1998; 101(1):99-128. PubMed ID: 12774805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consent to clinical decisions when capacity is absent. Part 1: Making decisions.
    Nazarko L
    Nurs Manag (Harrow); 2004 Mar; 10(10):18-22. PubMed ID: 15038301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. COUNTERPOINT: Do physicians have a responsibility to provide recommendations regarding goals of care to surrogates of dying patients in the ICU? No.
    Veatch RM
    Chest; 2015 Jun; 147(6):1455-7. PubMed ID: 26033123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. POINT: Do physicians have a responsibility to provide recommendations regarding goals of care to surrogates of dying patients in the ICU? Yes.
    Hutchison PJ
    Chest; 2015 Jun; 147(6):1453-5. PubMed ID: 26033122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new standard for incapacitated patient decision making: the clinical standard of surrogate empowerment.
    Tunzi M
    J Clin Ethics; 2012; 23(4):316-30. PubMed ID: 23469692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Status update: the complexities of the internet age bring urgency for deliberately making advance health care decision wishes known.
    Siess S; Moyer A
    Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):49-50. PubMed ID: 22974037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Authenticating an online identity.
    Matthews S
    Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):39-41. PubMed ID: 22974032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.