124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21045179)
1. Dedicated dual-head gamma imaging for breast cancer screening in women with mammographically dense breasts.
Rhodes DJ; Hruska CB; Phillips SW; Whaley DH; O'Connor MK
Radiology; 2011 Jan; 258(1):106-18. PubMed ID: 21045179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Journal club: molecular breast imaging at reduced radiation dose for supplemental screening in mammographically dense breasts.
Rhodes DJ; Hruska CB; Conners AL; Tortorelli CL; Maxwell RW; Jones KN; Toledano AY; O'Connor MK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Feb; 204(2):241-51. PubMed ID: 25615744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic workup and costs of a single supplemental molecular breast imaging screen of mammographically dense breasts.
Hruska CB; Conners AL; Jones KN; O'Connor MK; Moriarty JP; Boughey JC; Rhodes DJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jun; 204(6):1345-53. PubMed ID: 26001247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk.
Berg WA; Zhang Z; Lehrer D; Jong RA; Pisano ED; Barr RG; Böhm-Vélez M; Mahoney MC; Evans WP; Larsen LH; Morton MJ; Mendelson EB; Farria DM; Cormack JB; Marques HS; Adams A; Yeh NM; Gabrielli G;
JAMA; 2012 Apr; 307(13):1394-404. PubMed ID: 22474203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High-resolution diffusion-weighted MRI plus mammography for detecting clinically occult breast cancers in women with dense breasts.
Kim HJ; Shin HJ; Baek S; Lee CW; Choi WJ; Chae EY; Cha JH; Kim HH; Moon WK
Eur J Radiol; 2024 Jun; 175():111440. PubMed ID: 38547744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Supplemental magnetic resonance imaging plus mammography compared with magnetic resonance imaging or mammography by extent of breast density.
Kerlikowske K; Zhu W; Su YR; Sprague BL; Stout NK; Onega T; O'Meara ES; Henderson LM; Tosteson ANA; Wernli K; Miglioretti DL
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2024 Feb; 116(2):249-257. PubMed ID: 37897090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts.
Kelly KM; Dean J; Comulada WS; Lee SJ
Eur Radiol; 2010 Mar; 20(3):734-42. PubMed ID: 19727744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Background parenchymal uptake on molecular breast imaging as a breast cancer risk factor: a case-control study.
Hruska CB; Scott CG; Conners AL; Whaley DH; Rhodes DJ; Carter RE; O'Connor MK; Hunt KN; Brandt KR; Vachon CM
Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Apr; 18(1):42. PubMed ID: 27113363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated 3D Ultrasound as an Adjunct to Screening Mammography Programs in Dense Breast: Literature Review and Metanalysis.
Gatta G; Somma F; Sardu C; De Chiara M; Massafra R; Fanizzi A; La Forgia D; Cuccurullo V; Iovino F; Clemente A; Marfella R; Grezia GD
J Pers Med; 2023 Dec; 13(12):. PubMed ID: 38138910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic utility of combined ultrasonography and mammography in the evaluation of women with mammographically dense breasts.
De Felice C; Savelli S; Angeletti M; Ballesio L; Manganaro L; Meggiorini ML; Porfiri LM
J Ultrasound; 2007 Sep; 10(3):143-51. PubMed ID: 23396266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Deep learning for detection of iso-dense, obscure masses in mammographically dense breasts.
Rangarajan K; Aggarwal P; Gupta DK; Dhanakshirur R; Baby A; Pal C; Gupta AK; Hari S; Banerjee S; Arora C
Eur Radiol; 2023 Nov; 33(11):8112-8121. PubMed ID: 37209125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Screening in Patients With Dense Breasts: Comparison of Mammography, Artificial Intelligence, and Supplementary Ultrasound.
Lee SE; Yoon JH; Son NH; Han K; Moon HJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2024 Jan; 222(1):e2329655. PubMed ID: 37493324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Monofrequency electrical impedance mammography (EIM) diagnostic system in breast cancer screening.
Murillo-Ortiz B; Hernández-Ramírez A; Rivera-Villanueva T; Suárez-García D; Murguía-Pérez M; Martínez-Garza S; Rodríguez-Penin A; Romero-Coripuna R; López-Partida XM
BMC Cancer; 2020 Sep; 20(1):876. PubMed ID: 32928153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of mammography detection on the course of breast cancer in women aged 40-49 years.
Malmgren JA; Parikh J; Atwood MK; Kaplan HG
Radiology; 2012 Mar; 262(3):797-806. PubMed ID: 22357883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of breast density on the benefits of mammograms with adjunctive ultrasonography in breast screening.
Nakamura A; Ohnuki K; Takahashi H; Usami S; Ishida Y; Shibata S; Umemura A; Takikawa Y; Kano A
Breast Cancer; 2024 Mar; 31(2):228-233. PubMed ID: 38012337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cancer detection rate of breast-MR in supplemental screening after negative mammography in women with dense breasts. Preliminary results of the MA-DETECT-Study after 200 participants.
Kaiser C; Wilhelm T; Walter S; Singer S; Keller E; Baltzer PAT
Eur J Radiol; 2024 Apr; 176():111476. PubMed ID: 38710116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Role of Ultrasound in Screening Dense Breasts-A Review of the Literature and Practical Solutions for Implementation.
Thigpen D; Kappler A; Brem R
Diagnostics (Basel); 2018 Mar; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 29547532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Molecular breast imaging: an emerging modality for breast cancer screening.
O'Connor MK
Breast Cancer Manag; 2015 Jan; 4(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 25621015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Survey of Patient Experience During Molecular Breast Imaging.
Hruska CB; Gray LR; Jenkins SM; Block EA; Hunt KN; Conners AL; Zingula SN; O'Connor MK; Rhodes DJ
J Nucl Med Technol; 2024 Jun; 52(2):107-114. PubMed ID: 38839120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changing pattern of the detection of locoregional relapse in breast cancer: the Edinburgh experience.
Montgomery DA; Krupa K; Jack WJ; Kerr GR; Kunkler IH; Thomas J; Dixon JM
Br J Cancer; 2007 Jun; 96(12):1802-7. PubMed ID: 17533401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
