These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21045872)

  • 1. Optimal reconstruction for closed-loop ground-layer adaptive optics with elongated spots.
    Béchet C; Tallon M; Tallon-Bosc I; Thiébaut É; Le Louarn M; Clare RM
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2010 Nov; 27(11):A1-8. PubMed ID: 21045872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laser guide star wavefront sensing for ground-layer adaptive optics on extremely large telescopes.
    Clare RM; Le Louarn M; Béchet C
    Appl Opt; 2011 Feb; 50(4):473-83. PubMed ID: 21283238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Real-time turbulence profiling with a pair of laser guide star Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors for wide-field adaptive optics systems on large to extremely large telescopes.
    Gilles L; Ellerbroek BL
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2010 Nov; 27(11):A76-83. PubMed ID: 21045893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differential focal anisoplanatism in laser guide star wavefront sensing on extremely large telescopes.
    Muller N; Michau V; Robert C; Rousset G
    Opt Lett; 2011 Oct; 36(20):4071-3. PubMed ID: 22002389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tomographic wavefront error using multi-LGS constellation sensed with Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors.
    Robert C; Conan JM; Gratadour D; Schreiber L; Fusco T
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2010 Nov; 27(11):A201-15. PubMed ID: 21045881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficient reconstruction method for ground layer adaptive optics with mixed natural and laser guide stars.
    Wagner R; Helin T; Obereder A; Ramlau R
    Appl Opt; 2016 Feb; 55(6):1421-9. PubMed ID: 26906596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of sodium laser guide star fratricide on multi-conjugate adaptive optics systems.
    Wang L; Otarola A; Ellerbroek B
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2010 Nov; 27(11):A19-28. PubMed ID: 21045880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving centroiding by super-resolution reconstruction of sodium layer density in Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors.
    Mello AJ; Pipa DR
    Appl Opt; 2016 May; 55(14):3701-10. PubMed ID: 27168279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A laser guide star wavefront sensor bench demonstrator for TMT.
    Lardiere O; Conan R; Bradley C; Jackson K; Herriot G
    Opt Express; 2008 Apr; 16(8):5527-43. PubMed ID: 18542656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experimental results of ground-layer and tomographic wavefront reconstruction from multiple laser guide stars.
    Lloyd-Hart M; Baranec C; Milton NM; Snyder M; Stalcup T; Angel JR
    Opt Express; 2006 Aug; 14(17):7541-51. PubMed ID: 19529120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental assessment of the matched filter for laser guide star wavefront sensing.
    Conan R; Lardière O; Herriot G; Bradley C; Jackson K
    Appl Opt; 2009 Feb; 48(6):1198-211. PubMed ID: 23567582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of wavefront sensor models for simulation of adaptive optics.
    Wu Z; Enmark A; Owner-Petersen M; Andersen T
    Opt Express; 2009 Oct; 17(22):20575-83. PubMed ID: 19997286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Extension of the matched-filter algorithm to multiple guide star Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor.
    Piatrou P
    Appl Opt; 2019 Feb; 58(4):841-849. PubMed ID: 30874128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tomography approach for multi-object adaptive optics.
    Vidal F; Gendron E; Rousset G
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2010 Nov; 27(11):A253-64. PubMed ID: 21045886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Revisiting the comparison between the Shack-Hartmann and the pyramid wavefront sensors via the Fisher information matrix.
    Plantet C; Meimon S; Conan JM; Fusco T
    Opt Express; 2015 Nov; 23(22):28619-33. PubMed ID: 26561131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance comparison of wavefront reconstruction and control algorithms for Extremely Large Telescopes.
    Montilla I; Béchet C; Le Louarn M; Reyes M; Tallon M
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2010 Nov; 27(11):A9-18. PubMed ID: 21045895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wide field adaptive optics laboratory demonstration with closed-loop tomographic control.
    Costille A; Petit C; Conan JM; Kulcsár C; Raynaud HF; Fusco T
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2010 Mar; 27(3):469-83. PubMed ID: 20208937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adaptive control in an adaptive optics experiment.
    Monirabbasi S; Gibson S
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2010 Nov; 27(11):A84-96. PubMed ID: 21045894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Layer-oriented adaptive optics for solar telescopes.
    Kellerer A
    Appl Opt; 2012 Aug; 51(23):5743-51. PubMed ID: 22885589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Constrained matched filtering for extended dynamic range and improved noise rejection for Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensing.
    Gilles L; Ellerbroek BL
    Opt Lett; 2008 May; 33(10):1159-61. PubMed ID: 18483545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.