353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21046133)
1. Weight estimation for low birth weight fetuses and macrosomic fetuses in Chinese population.
Chen P; Yu J; Li X; Wang Y; Chang C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Sep; 284(3):599-606. PubMed ID: 21046133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Incorporating sonographic cheek-to-cheek diameter, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference improves weight estimation in the macrosomic fetus.
Abramowicz JS; Robischon K; Cox C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 9(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 9239827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Different formulas, different thresholds and different performance-the prediction of macrosomia by ultrasound.
Aviram A; Yogev Y; Ashwal E; Hiersch L; Danon D; Hadar E; Gabbay-Benziv R
J Perinatol; 2017 Dec; 37(12):1285-1291. PubMed ID: 28906497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasonographic Fetal Weight Estimation: Should Macrosomia-Specific Formulas Be Utilized?
Porter B; Neely C; Szychowski J; Owen J
Am J Perinatol; 2015 Aug; 32(10):968-72. PubMed ID: 25730134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Ultrasound macrosomic fetal weight estimation formula using maternal weight measurements].
Murlewska J; Pietryga M; Wender-Ozegowska E
Ginekol Pol; 2011 Feb; 82(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 21574483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Macrosomia: a new formula for optimized fetal weight estimation.
Hart NC; Hilbert A; Meurer B; Schrauder M; Schmid M; Siemer J; Voigt M; Schild RL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jan; 35(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 20034003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. New sonographic method for fetuses with a large abdominal circumference improves fetal weight estimation.
Kehl S; Körber C; Hart N; Goecke TW; Schild RL; Siemer J
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Jun; 33(3):265-9. PubMed ID: 21080309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimized Sonographic Weight Estimation of Fetuses over 3500 g Using Biometry-Guided Formula Selection.
Balsyte D; Schäffer L; Zimmermann R; Kurmanavicius J; Burkhardt T
Ultraschall Med; 2017 Jan; 38(1):60-64. PubMed ID: 26422668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. How good is fetal weight estimation using volumetric methods?
Siemer J; Peter W; Zollver H; Hart N; Müller A; Meurer B; Goecke T; Schild RL
Ultraschall Med; 2008 Aug; 29(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 18484061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incorporation of femur length leads to underestimation of fetal weight in asymmetric preterm growth restriction.
Proctor LK; Rushworth V; Shah PS; Keunen J; Windrim R; Ryan G; Kingdom J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 35(4):442-8. PubMed ID: 20196066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of 36 different weight estimation formulae in fetuses with macrosomia.
Hoopmann M; Abele H; Wagner N; Wallwiener D; Kagan KO
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2010; 27(4):204-13. PubMed ID: 20523027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fetal front-abdominal wall thickness in the second trimester as a predictor of abnormal fetal growth.
Madendag Y; Aksoy U; Col Madendag I; Aksoy H
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Mar; 35(6):1162-1168. PubMed ID: 32208785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A new formula for optimized weight estimation in extreme fetal macrosomia (≥ 4500 g).
Faschingbauer F; Beckmann MW; Goecke TW; Yazdi B; Siemer J; Schmid M; Mayr A; Schild RL
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Oct; 33(5):480-8. PubMed ID: 22723038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A new sonographic weight formula for fetuses Siemer J; Hilbert A; Hart N; Meurer B; Goecke T; Schild RL
Ultraschall Med; 2009 Feb; 30(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 19137495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does the Porter formula hold its promise? A weight estimation formula for macrosomic fetuses put to the test.
Weiss C; Enengl S; Enzelsberger SH; Mayer RB; Oppelt P
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Jan; 301(1):129-135. PubMed ID: 31883045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Accuracy of ultrasonic fetal weight estimation using head and abdominal circumference and femur length].
Mladenović-Segedi L; Segedi D
Med Pregl; 2005; 58(11-12):548-52. PubMed ID: 16673856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Estimation of small and large fetal weight at delivery from ultrasound data].
Lalys L; Grangé G; Pineau JC
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2012 Oct; 41(6):566-73. PubMed ID: 22748475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ultrasonographic weight estimation in large for gestational age fetuses: a comparison of 17 sonographic formulas and four models algorithms.
Rosati P; Arduini M; Giri C; Guariglia L
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 Jul; 23(7):675-80. PubMed ID: 19895358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight in macrosomic fetuses: diabetic versus non-diabetic pregnancies.
Wong SF; Chan FY; Cincotta RB; Oats JJ; McIntyre HD
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2001 Nov; 41(4):429-32. PubMed ID: 11787919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Disadvantages of a weight estimation formula for macrosomic fetuses: the Hart formula from a clinical perspective.
Weiss C; Oppelt P; Mayer RB
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Dec; 298(6):1101-1106. PubMed ID: 30284620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
