196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21046155)
1. Higher physical workload risks with NOTES versus laparoscopy: a quantitative ergonomic assessment.
Lee G; Sutton E; Clanton T; Park A
Surg Endosc; 2011 May; 25(5):1585-93. PubMed ID: 21046155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative assessment of physical and cognitive ergonomics associated with robotic and traditional laparoscopic surgeries.
Lee GI; Lee MR; Clanton T; Sutton E; Park AE; Marohn MR
Surg Endosc; 2014 Feb; 28(2):456-65. PubMed ID: 24196542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantifying mental workloads of surgeons performing natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) procedures.
Zheng B; Rieder E; Cassera MA; Martinec DV; Lee G; Panton ON; Park A; Swanström LL
Surg Endosc; 2012 May; 26(5):1352-8. PubMed ID: 22052427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ergonomic analysis of laparoscopic and robotic surgical task performance at various experience levels.
Zárate Rodriguez JG; Zihni AM; Ohu I; Cavallo JA; Ray S; Cho S; Awad MM
Surg Endosc; 2019 Jun; 33(6):1938-1943. PubMed ID: 30350099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the effect of a laparoscopic robotized needle holder on ergonomics and skills.
Bensignor T; Morel G; Reversat D; Fuks D; Gayet B
Surg Endosc; 2016 Feb; 30(2):446-454. PubMed ID: 26017905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. FLS tasks can be used as an ergonomic discriminator between laparoscopic and robotic surgery.
Zihni AM; Ohu I; Cavallo JA; Ousley J; Cho S; Awad MM
Surg Endosc; 2014 Aug; 28(8):2459-65. PubMed ID: 24619332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of laparoscopic instrument working angle on surgeons' upper extremity workload.
Berguer R; Forkey DL; Smith WD
Surg Endosc; 2001 Sep; 15(9):1027-9. PubMed ID: 11443477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surgeons' posture and muscle strain during laparoscopic and robotic surgery.
Dalager T; Jensen PT; Eriksen JR; Jakobsen HL; Mogensen O; Søgaard K
Br J Surg; 2020 May; 107(6):756-766. PubMed ID: 31922258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating the Ergonomics of Flexible Ureteroscopy.
Ludwig WW; Lee G; Ziemba JB; Ko JS; Matlaga BR
J Endourol; 2017 Oct; 31(10):1062-1066. PubMed ID: 28817961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of Patient Body Mass Index on Laparoscopic Surgical Ergonomics.
Liang Z; Gerull WD; Wang R; Zihni A; Ray S; Awad M
Obes Surg; 2019 Jun; 29(6):1709-1713. PubMed ID: 30712169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of muscle activity and fatigue during laparoscopic surgery.
Thurston T; Dolan JP; Husain F; Stroud A; Funk K; Borzy C; Zhu X
Surg Endosc; 2022 Sep; 36(9):6672-6678. PubMed ID: 35034217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An ergonomic field study to evaluate the effects of a rotatable handle piece on muscular stress and fatigue as well as subjective ratings of usability, wrist posture and precision during laparoscopic surgery: an explorative pilot study.
Kraemer B; Seibt R; Stoffels AK; Rothmund R; Brucker SY; Rieger MA; Steinhilber B
Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 2018 Nov; 91(8):1021-1029. PubMed ID: 30078157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Physical Workload of Surgeons: A Comparison of SILS and Conventional Laparoscopy.
Alleblas CC; Velthuis S; Nieboer TE; Sietses C; Stegeman DF
Surg Innov; 2015 Aug; 22(4):376-81. PubMed ID: 25801191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A multitasking platform for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): a benchtop comparison of a new device for flexible endoscopic surgery and a standard dual-channel endoscope.
Spaun GO; Zheng B; Swanström LL
Surg Endosc; 2009 Dec; 23(12):2720-7. PubMed ID: 19360364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ergonomic analysis of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic procedures.
Zihni AM; Ohu I; Cavallo JA; Cho S; Awad MM
Surg Endosc; 2014 Dec; 28(12):3379-84. PubMed ID: 24928233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of novel shift handle laparoscopic tool on wrist ergonomics and task performance.
Yu D; Lowndes B; Morrow M; Kaufman K; Bingener J; Hallbeck S
Surg Endosc; 2016 Aug; 30(8):3480-90. PubMed ID: 26541720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bimanual coordination in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: comparing the conventional dual-channel endoscope, the R-Scope, and a novel direct-drive system.
Spaun GO; Zheng B; Martinec DV; Cassera MA; Dunst CM; Swanström LL
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 May; 69(6):e39-45. PubMed ID: 19410036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Objective analysis of surgeons' ergonomy during laparoendoscopic single-site surgery through the use of surface electromyography and a motion capture data glove.
Pérez-Duarte FJ; Lucas-Hernández M; Matos-Azevedo A; Sánchez-Margallo JA; Díaz-Güemes I; Sánchez-Margallo FM
Surg Endosc; 2014 Apr; 28(4):1314-20. PubMed ID: 24337915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ergonomics Analysis for Subjective and Objective Fatigue Between Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgical Skills Practice Among Surgeons.
Rodrigues Armijo P; Huang CK; Carlson T; Oleynikov D; Siu KC
Surg Innov; 2020 Feb; 27(1):81-87. PubMed ID: 31771411
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Ergonomic evaluation and performance of a new handle for laparoscopic tools in surgery.
Sancibrian R; Redondo-Figuero C; Gutierrez-Diez MC; Gonzalez-Sarabia E; Manuel-Palazuelos JC
Appl Ergon; 2020 Nov; 89():103210. PubMed ID: 32658774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
