These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21046367)

  • 1. Target switching in curved human arm movements is predicted by changing a single control parameter.
    Hoffmann H
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 208(1):73-87. PubMed ID: 21046367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study.
    Wolpert DM; Ghahramani Z; Jordan MI
    Exp Brain Res; 1995; 103(3):460-70. PubMed ID: 7789452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Overlap of movement planning and movement execution reduces reaction time.
    Orban de Xivry JJ; Legrain V; Lefèvre P
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jan; 117(1):117-122. PubMed ID: 27733598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coordinated turn-and-reach movements. I. Anticipatory compensation for self-generated coriolis and interaction torques.
    Pigeon P; Bortolami SB; DiZio P; Lackner JR
    J Neurophysiol; 2003 Jan; 89(1):276-89. PubMed ID: 12522179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A computational model for redundant human three-dimensional pointing movements: integration of independent spatial and temporal motor plans simplifies movement dynamics.
    Biess A; Liebermann DG; Flash T
    J Neurosci; 2007 Nov; 27(48):13045-64. PubMed ID: 18045899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reach-to-grasp movement as a minimization process.
    Yang F; Feldman AG
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Feb; 201(1):75-92. PubMed ID: 19771417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reaction time and movement duration influence on end point accuracy in a fast reaching task.
    Skurvidas A; Mickevichiene D; Cesnavichiene V; Gutnik B; Nash D
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 2012; 38(3):73-80. PubMed ID: 22830246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative examinations of internal representations for arm trajectory planning: minimum commanded torque change model.
    Nakano E; Imamizu H; Osu R; Uno Y; Gomi H; Yoshioka T; Kawato M
    J Neurophysiol; 1999 May; 81(5):2140-55. PubMed ID: 10322055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Movement curvature planning through force field internal models.
    Petreska B; Billard A
    Biol Cybern; 2009 May; 100(5):331-50. PubMed ID: 19381682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Smoothness maximization along a predefined path accurately predicts the speed profiles of complex arm movements.
    Todorov E; Jordan MI
    J Neurophysiol; 1998 Aug; 80(2):696-714. PubMed ID: 9705462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A motor planning stage represents the shape of upcoming movement trajectories.
    Wong AL; Goldsmith J; Krakauer JW
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Aug; 116(2):296-305. PubMed ID: 27098032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Self-moved target eye tracking in control and deafferented subjects: roles of arm motor command and proprioception in arm-eye coordination.
    Vercher JL; Gauthier GM; Guédon O; Blouin J; Cole J; Lamarre Y
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Aug; 76(2):1133-44. PubMed ID: 8871226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trajectory formation of the center-of-mass of the arm during reaching movements.
    Suzuki M; Yamazaki Y; Mizuno N; Matsunami K
    Neuroscience; 1997 Jan; 76(2):597-610. PubMed ID: 9015341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neuronal activity related to the visual representation of arm movements in the lateral cerebellar cortex.
    Liu X; Robertson E; Miall RC
    J Neurophysiol; 2003 Mar; 89(3):1223-37. PubMed ID: 12612044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of execution noise in movement variability.
    van Beers RJ; Haggard P; Wolpert DM
    J Neurophysiol; 2004 Feb; 91(2):1050-63. PubMed ID: 14561687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimum acceleration criterion with constraints implies bang-bang control as an underlying principle for optimal trajectories of arm reaching movements.
    Ben-Itzhak S; Karniel A
    Neural Comput; 2008 Mar; 20(3):779-812. PubMed ID: 18045017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Role of sensory information in updating internal models of the effector during arm tracking.
    Vercher JL; Sarès F; Blouin J; Bourdin C; Gauthier G
    Prog Brain Res; 2003; 142():203-22. PubMed ID: 12693263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hand trajectory invariance in reaching movements involving the trunk.
    Adamovich SV; Archambault PS; Ghafouri M; Levin MF; Poizner H; Feldman AG
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Jun; 138(3):288-303. PubMed ID: 11460767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Shared bimanual tasks elicit bimanual reflexes during movement.
    Mutha PK; Sainburg RL
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Dec; 102(6):3142-55. PubMed ID: 19793874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Active Braking of Whole-Arm Reaching Movements Provides Single-Trial Neuromuscular Measures of Movement Cancellation.
    Atsma J; Maij F; Gu C; Medendorp WP; Corneil BD
    J Neurosci; 2018 May; 38(18):4367-4382. PubMed ID: 29636393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.