These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21046474)

  • 1. Eukaryotic and prokaryotic promoter prediction using hybrid approach.
    Lin H; Li QZ
    Theory Biosci; 2011 Jun; 130(2):91-100. PubMed ID: 21046474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Critical assessment of computational tools for prokaryotic and eukaryotic promoter prediction.
    Zhang M; Jia C; Li F; Li C; Zhu Y; Akutsu T; Webb GI; Zou Q; Coin LJM; Song J
    Brief Bioinform; 2022 Mar; 23(2):. PubMed ID: 35021193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recognition of prokaryotic and eukaryotic promoters using convolutional deep learning neural networks.
    Umarov RK; Solovyev VV
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171410. PubMed ID: 28158264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A novel method for prokaryotic promoter prediction based on DNA stability.
    Kanhere A; Bansal M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jan; 6():1. PubMed ID: 15631638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. iProEP: A Computational Predictor for Predicting Promoter.
    Lai HY; Zhang ZY; Su ZD; Su W; Ding H; Chen W; Lin H
    Mol Ther Nucleic Acids; 2019 Sep; 17():337-346. PubMed ID: 31299595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Toward Algorithms for Automation of Postgenomic Data Analyses:
    Coelho RV; Dall'Alba G; de Avila E Silva S; Echeverrigaray S; Delamare APL
    OMICS; 2020 May; 24(5):300-309. PubMed ID: 31573385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recognition of prokaryotic promoters based on a novel variable-window Z-curve method.
    Song K
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2012 Feb; 40(3):963-71. PubMed ID: 21954440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The cross-species prediction of bacterial promoters using a support vector machine.
    Towsey M; Timms P; Hogan J; Mathews SA
    Comput Biol Chem; 2008 Oct; 32(5):359-66. PubMed ID: 18703385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identification and annotation of promoter regions in microbial genome sequences on the basis of DNA stability.
    Rangannan V; Bansal M
    J Biosci; 2007 Aug; 32(5):851-62. PubMed ID: 17914227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prokaryotic and eukaryotic promoters identification based on residual network transfer learning.
    Liu X; Xu Y; Luo Y; Teng L
    Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2022 May; 45(5):955-967. PubMed ID: 35279747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A compression-based approach for coding sequences identification. I. Application to prokaryotic genomes.
    Menconi G; Marangoni R
    J Comput Biol; 2006 Oct; 13(8):1477-88. PubMed ID: 17061923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pol II promoter prediction using characteristic 4-mer motifs: a machine learning approach.
    Anwar F; Baker SM; Jabid T; Mehedi Hasan M; Shoyaib M; Khan H; Walshe R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Oct; 9():414. PubMed ID: 18834544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction and analysis of prokaryotic promoters based on sequence features.
    Liu X; Guo Z; He T; Ren M
    Biosystems; 2020 Nov; 197():104218. PubMed ID: 32755610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computational identification of eukaryotic promoters based on cascaded deep capsule neural networks.
    Zhu Y; Li F; Xiang D; Akutsu T; Song J; Jia C
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 Jul; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 33227813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Promoter prediction and annotation of microbial genomes based on DNA sequence and structural responses to superhelical stress.
    Wang H; Benham CJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 May; 7():248. PubMed ID: 16677393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prokaryotic promoters in biotechnology.
    Goldstein MA; Doi RH
    Biotechnol Annu Rev; 1995; 1():105-28. PubMed ID: 9704086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Promoters of major Escherichia coli heat shock genes seem non-functional in Bacillus subtilis.
    Wetzstein M; Schumann W
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 1990 Oct; 60(1-2):55-8. PubMed ID: 2126519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sequences required for regulation of arginine biosynthesis promoters are conserved between Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli.
    Smith MC; Czaplewski L; North AK; Baumberg S; Stockley PG
    Mol Microbiol; 1989 Jan; 3(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 2497296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. PPD: A Manually Curated Database for Experimentally Verified Prokaryotic Promoters.
    Su W; Liu ML; Yang YH; Wang JS; Li SH; Lv H; Dao FY; Yang H; Lin H
    J Mol Biol; 2021 May; 433(11):166860. PubMed ID: 33539888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identification of core promoter modules in Drosophila and their application in accurate transcription start site prediction.
    Ohler U
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2006; 34(20):5943-50. PubMed ID: 17068082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.