These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21047862)

  • 1. Differences in the temporal dynamics of phenotypic selection among fitness components in the wild.
    Siepielski AM; DiBattista JD; Evans JA; Carlson SM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2011 May; 278(1711):1572-80. PubMed ID: 21047862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fecundity selection theory: concepts and evidence.
    Pincheira-Donoso D; Hunt J
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2017 Feb; 92(1):341-356. PubMed ID: 26526765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. It's about time: the temporal dynamics of phenotypic selection in the wild.
    Siepielski AM; DiBattista JD; Carlson SM
    Ecol Lett; 2009 Nov; 12(11):1261-76. PubMed ID: 19740111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Artificial selection reveals sex differences in the genetic basis of sexual attractiveness.
    Gosden TP; Reddiex AJ; Chenoweth SF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(21):5498-5503. PubMed ID: 29735676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sexual selection, phenotypic plasticity and female reproductive output.
    Fox RJ; Fromhage L; Jennions MD
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2019 Mar; 374(1768):20180184. PubMed ID: 30966965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Strength and tempo of directional selection in the wild.
    Hoekstra HE; Hoekstra JM; Berrigan D; Vignieri SN; Hoang A; Hill CE; Beerli P; Kingsolver JG
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2001 Jul; 98(16):9157-60. PubMed ID: 11470913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The strength of sex-specific selection in the wild.
    Singh A; Punzalan D
    Evolution; 2018 Dec; 72(12):2818-2824. PubMed ID: 30298925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Selection analysis on the rapid evolution of a secondary sexual trait.
    Gordon SP; Reznick D; Arendt JD; Roughton A; Ontiveros Hernandez MN; Bentzen P; López-Sepulcre A
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Aug; 282(1813):20151244. PubMed ID: 26290077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlational selection on personality and social plasticity: morphology and social context determine behavioural effects on mating success.
    Montiglio PO; Wey TW; Chang AT; Fogarty S; Sih A
    J Anim Ecol; 2017 Mar; 86(2):213-226. PubMed ID: 27859289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How to quantify (the response to) sexual selection on traits.
    Henshaw JM; Jennions MD; Kruuk LEB
    Evolution; 2018 Sep; 72(9):1904-1917. PubMed ID: 30004126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sexual selection can both increase and decrease extinction probability: reconciling demographic and evolutionary factors.
    Martínez-Ruiz C; Knell RJ
    J Anim Ecol; 2017 Jan; 86(1):117-127. PubMed ID: 27861841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Fitness Components in Experimental Evolution.
    Liu J; Champer J; Langmüller AM; Liu C; Chung J; Reeves R; Luthra A; Lee YL; Vaughn AH; Clark AG; Messer PW
    Genetics; 2019 Mar; 211(3):1005-1017. PubMed ID: 30679262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Opposing selection and environmental variation modify optimal timing of breeding.
    Tarwater CE; Beissinger SR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Sep; 110(38):15365-70. PubMed ID: 24003118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Female sexual polymorphism and fecundity consequences of male mating harassment in the wild.
    Gosden TP; Svensson EI
    PLoS One; 2007 Jun; 2(6):e580. PubMed ID: 17593979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The evolution of age-specific choosiness when mating.
    Cotto O; Day T
    J Evol Biol; 2021 Mar; 34(3):477-485. PubMed ID: 33314385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evolutionary divergence in competitive mating success through female mating bias for good genes.
    Dugand RJ; Kennington WJ; Tomkins JL
    Sci Adv; 2018 May; 4(5):eaaq0369. PubMed ID: 29806021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Structure of sexual networks determines the operation of sexual selection.
    McDonald GC; Pizzari T
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Jan; 115(1):E53-E61. PubMed ID: 29255016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mating patterns influence vulnerability to the extinction vortex.
    Godwin JL; Lumley AJ; Michalczyk Ł; Martin OY; Gage MJG
    Glob Chang Biol; 2020 Aug; 26(8):4226-4239. PubMed ID: 32558066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relative effects of female fecundity and male mating success on fertility selection in Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Brockett MM; Alavi H; Anderson WW
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1996 Apr; 93(7):3080-2. PubMed ID: 8610171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phenotypic selection in natural populations: what limits directional selection?
    Kingsolver JG; Diamond SE
    Am Nat; 2011 Mar; 177(3):346-57. PubMed ID: 21460543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.