137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21048225)
1. Stimuli that signal the absence of reinforcement are paid more attention than are irrelevant stimuli.
Dopson JC; Williams NA; Esber GR; Pearce JM
Learn Behav; 2010 Nov; 38(4):337-47. PubMed ID: 21048225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Changes in attention to an irrelevant cue that accompanies a negative patterning [corrected] discrimination.
Dopson JC; Esber GR; Pearce JM
Learn Behav; 2011 Dec; 39(4):336-49. PubMed ID: 21499985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differences in the associability of relevant and irrelevant stimuli.
Dopson JC; Esber GR; Pearce JM
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Apr; 36(2):258-67. PubMed ID: 20384405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Conditional discrimination with ambiguous stimuli.
Meltzer D
J Exp Anal Behav; 1983 Mar; 39(2):241-9. PubMed ID: 6842128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Summation in autoshaping is affected by the similarity of the visual stimuli to the stimulation they replace.
Pearce JM; Redhead ES; George DN
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2002 Apr; 28(2):175-89. PubMed ID: 11987874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Most directed forgetting in pigeons can be attributed to the absence of reinforcement on forget trials during training or to other procedural artifacts.
Zentall TR; Roper KL; Sherburne LM
J Exp Anal Behav; 1995 Mar; 63(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 7714447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of stimulus orderability and reinforcement history on transitive responding in pigeons.
Lazareva OF; Wasserman EA
Behav Processes; 2006 May; 72(2):161-72. PubMed ID: 16460886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transfer of value from S+ to S- in a simultaneous discrimination.
Zentall TR; Sherburne LM
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1994 Apr; 20(2):176-83. PubMed ID: 8189186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of discrimination training on responding during a compound conditioned stimulus.
Pearce JM; Adam J; Wilson PN; Darby RJ
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1992 Oct; 18(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 1402694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Conjoint control of performance in conditional discriminations by successive and simultaneous stimuli.
White KG
J Exp Anal Behav; 1986 Mar; 45(2):161-74. PubMed ID: 3958662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reflexivity in pigeons.
Sweeney MM; Urcuioli PJ
J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Nov; 94(3):267-82. PubMed ID: 21541171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The resistance to change of observing.
Shahan TA; Magee A; Dobberstein A
J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Nov; 80(3):273-93. PubMed ID: 14964708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Extinction reveals stimulus control: latent learning of feature-negative discriminations in pigeons.
Hearst E
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1987 Jan; 13(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 3819651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of amount of training per reversal on successive reversals of a color discrimination.
Beale IL
J Exp Anal Behav; 1970 Nov; 14(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 5491010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pigeons' discrimination of Michotte's launching effect.
Young ME; Beckmann JS; Wasserman EA
J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Sep; 86(2):223-37. PubMed ID: 17002229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The relative importance of reinforced versus nonreinforced stimuli in visual discrimination learning by redwinged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus).
Mason JR; Reidinger RF
J Gen Psychol; 1982 Oct; 107(2d Half):219-26. PubMed ID: 7175510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Discrimination of relative numerosity and stimulus mixture by pigeons with comparable tasks.
Honig WK; Matheson WR
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1995 Oct; 21(4):348-62. PubMed ID: 7595241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Observing responses maintained by conditional discriminative stimuli.
Ohta A
J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 Nov; 48(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 3430109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Duration of signals for intertrial reinforcement and nonreinforcement in random control procedures.
Cooper LD; Aronson L; Balsam PD; Gibbon J
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1990 Jan; 16(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 2303790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prior commitment: Its effect on suboptimal choice in a gambling-like task.
Zentall TR; Andrews DM; Case JP
Behav Processes; 2017 Dec; 145():1-9. PubMed ID: 28939341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
