These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21048229)

  • 1. Concurrent VR VI schedules: primacy of molar control of preference and molecular control of response rates.
    Tanno T; Silberberg A; Sakagami T
    Learn Behav; 2010 Nov; 38(4):382-93. PubMed ID: 21048229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response rate and sensitivity to the molar feedback function relating response and reinforcement rate on VI+ schedules of reinforcement.
    Reed P
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Oct; 33(4):428-39. PubMed ID: 17924790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inter-response-time reinforcement and relative reinforcer frequency control choice.
    Tanno T; Silberberg A
    Learn Behav; 2015 Mar; 43(1):54-71. PubMed ID: 25515591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the primacy of molecular processes in determining response rates under variable-ratio and variable-interval schedules.
    Tanno T; Sakagami T
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2008 Jan; 89(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 18338672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rats' performance on variable-interval schedules with a linear feedback loop between response rate and reinforcement rate.
    Reed P; Hildebrandt T; DeJongh J; Soh M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Mar; 79(2):157-73. PubMed ID: 12822684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Free-operant performance on variable interval schedules with a linear feedback loop: no evidence for molar sensitivities in rats.
    Reed P; Soh M; Hildebrandt T; DeJongh J; Shek WY
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2000 Oct; 26(4):416-27. PubMed ID: 11056882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Single-sample discrimination of different schedules' reinforced interresponse times.
    Tanno T; Silberberg A; Sakagami T
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2009 Mar; 91(2):157-67. PubMed ID: 19794831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discrimination of variable schedules is controlled by interresponse times proximal to reinforcement.
    Tanno T; Silberberg A; Sakagami T
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 Nov; 98(3):341-54. PubMed ID: 23144509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Local preference in concurrent schedules: the effects of reinforcer sequences.
    Krägeloh CU; Davison M; Elliffe DM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jul; 84(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 16156136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Concurrent schedules of wheel-running reinforcement: choice between different durations of opportunity to run in rats.
    Belke TW
    Learn Behav; 2006 Feb; 34(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 16786885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exploring a concurrent-chains paradox: decreasing preference as an initial link is shortened.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Jan; 31(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 15656723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Drug discrimination under concurrent variable-ratio variable-ratio schedules.
    McMillan DE; Hardwick WC; Li M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Jan; 77(1):91-104. PubMed ID: 11831785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Concurrent-chains schedules as a method to study choice between alcohol-associated conditioned reinforcers.
    Jimenez-Gomez C; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 Jan; 97(1):71-83. PubMed ID: 22287805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contingency discriminability and peak shift in concurrent schedules.
    Krägeloh CU; Elliffe DM; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jul; 86(1):11-30. PubMed ID: 16903490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Arousal, changeover responses, and preference in concurrent schedules.
    McDevitt MA; Williams BA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Nov; 80(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 14964707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamical concurrent schedules.
    Palya WL; Allan RW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jan; 79(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 12696738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preference and resistance to change in concurrent variable-interval schedules.
    Bell MC; Williams BA
    Anim Learn Behav; 2002 Feb; 30(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 12017966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pausing as an operant: choice and discriminated responding.
    Craig AR; Lattal KA; Hall EG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Mar; 101(2):230-45. PubMed ID: 24436113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiple determinants of transfer of evaluative function after conditioning with free-operant schedules of reinforcement.
    Dack C; Reed P; McHugh L
    Learn Behav; 2010 Nov; 38(4):348-66. PubMed ID: 21048226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of required response force on rats' performance on a VI+ schedule of reinforcement.
    Reed P
    Learn Behav; 2006 Nov; 34(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 17330529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.