These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21048288)
1. Improving the singles rate method for modeling accidental coincidences in high-resolution PET. Oliver JF; Rafecas M Phys Med Biol; 2010 Nov; 55(22):6951-71. PubMed ID: 21048288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of inter-crystal scatter on estimation methods for random coincidences and subsequent correction. Torres-Espallardo I; Rafecas M; Spanoudaki V; McElroy DP; Ziegler SI Phys Med Biol; 2008 May; 53(9):2391-411. PubMed ID: 18421120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional positron emission tomography imaging with 124I and 86Y. Vandenberghe S Nucl Med Commun; 2006 Mar; 27(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 16479243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modelling Random Coincidences in Positron Emission Tomography by Using Singles and Prompts: A Comparison Study. Oliver JF; Rafecas M PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0162096. PubMed ID: 27603143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correction methods for random coincidences in fully 3D whole-body PET: impact on data and image quality. Brasse D; Kinahan PE; Lartizien C; Comtat C; Casey M; Michel C J Nucl Med; 2005 May; 46(5):859-67. PubMed ID: 15872361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Full modelling of the MOSAIC animal PET system based on the GATE Monte Carlo simulation code. Merheb C; Petegnief Y; Talbot JN Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(3):563-76. PubMed ID: 17228105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Monte Carlo modelling of singles-mode transmission data for small animal PET scanners. Vandervoort E; Camborde ML; Jan S; Sossi V Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3169-84. PubMed ID: 17505096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of a Monte Carlo simulation of the Philips Allegro/GEMINI PET systems using GATE. Lamare F; Turzo A; Bizais Y; Le Rest CC; Visvikis D Phys Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 51(4):943-62. PubMed ID: 16467589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Photon energy recovery: a method to improve the effective energy resolution of gamma cameras. Hannequin PP; Mas JF J Nucl Med; 1998 Mar; 39(3):555-62. PubMed ID: 9529311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of Philips Gemini TF PET/CT scanner with special consideration for its time-of-flight imaging capabilities. Surti S; Kuhn A; Werner ME; Perkins AE; Kolthammer J; Karp JS J Nucl Med; 2007 Mar; 48(3):471-80. PubMed ID: 17332626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Imaging of weak-source distributions in LSO-based small-animal PET scanners. Goertzen AL; Suk JY; Thompson CJ J Nucl Med; 2007 Oct; 48(10):1692-8. PubMed ID: 17873140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A self-normalization reconstruction technique for PET scans using the positron emission data. Salomon A; Goldschmidt B; Botnar R; Kiessling F; Schulz V IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Dec; 31(12):2234-40. PubMed ID: 22910096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance characteristics of a new 3-dimensional continuous-emission and spiral-transmission high-sensitivity and high-resolution PET camera evaluated with the NEMA NU 2-2001 standard. Matsumoto K; Kitamura K; Mizuta T; Tanaka K; Yamamoto S; Sakamoto S; Nakamoto Y; Amano M; Murase K; Senda M J Nucl Med; 2006 Jan; 47(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 16391191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reconstruction of scattered and unscattered PET coincidences using TOF and energy information. Conti M; Hong I; Michel C Phys Med Biol; 2012 Aug; 57(15):N307-17. PubMed ID: 22801215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. PET with a dual-head coincidence camera: spatial resolution, scatter fraction, and sensitivity. Kunze WD; Baehre M; Richter E J Nucl Med; 2000 Jun; 41(6):1067-74. PubMed ID: 10855637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Simulation of triple coincidences in PET. Cal-González J; Lage E; Herranz E; Vicente E; Udias JM; Moore SC; Park MA; Dave SR; Parot V; Herraiz JL Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(1):117-36. PubMed ID: 25479147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Energy dependence of nonstationary scatter subtraction--restoration in high resolution PET. Bentourkia M; Lecomte R IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Jan; 18(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 10193698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimizing injected dose in clinical PET by accurately modeling the counting-rate response functions specific to individual patient scans. Watson CC; Casey ME; Bendriem B; Carney JP; Townsend DW; Eberl S; Meikle S; Difilippo FP J Nucl Med; 2005 Nov; 46(11):1825-34. PubMed ID: 16269596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sinogram-based super-resolution in PET. Jeong KY; Choi K; Nam WH; Ra JB Phys Med Biol; 2011 Aug; 56(15):4881-94. PubMed ID: 21772086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Scatter correction for 3D PET using beam stoppers combined with dual-energy window acquisition: a feasibility study. Wu J; Chuang KS; Hsu CH; Jan ML; Hwang IM; Chen TJ Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(19):4593-607. PubMed ID: 16177492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]