301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21048481)
1. Focus on peer review.
Dougherty MC
Nurs Res; 2010; 59(6):371. PubMed ID: 21048481
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Abandon propaganda! Embrace scholarship!
Dougherty MC
Nurs Res; 2010; 59(3):157. PubMed ID: 20445437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Are we there yet? When is a literature review complete?
Shultz SM; Dell EY; Bodan CL
Am J Nurs; 2009 Sep; 109(9):78-9. PubMed ID: 19704244
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Thoughts on the end of the article: the implications for nursing practice.
Becker PT
Res Nurs Health; 2009 Jun; 32(3):241-2. PubMed ID: 19280621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Scientific letters.
Henly SJ
Nurs Res; 2008; 57(5):301. PubMed ID: 18794713
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Rigour and respect: aspects for consideration when undertaking and publishing research.
Marchant S
Midwifery; 2010 Jun; 26(3):264-7. PubMed ID: 20466468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Advice for authors. Four principal reasons for manuscript rejection].
Clarke SP
Perspect Infirm; 2006; 3(3):35-9. PubMed ID: 16480058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality of manuscript reviews in nursing research.
Henly SJ; Dougherty MC
Nurs Outlook; 2009; 57(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 19150263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Western Journal of Nursing Research welcomes stellar review articles.
Conn VS
West J Nurs Res; 2009 Feb; 31(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 19150971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. In praise of peer reviewers and the peer review process.
Peternelj-Taylor C
J Forensic Nurs; 2010; 6(4):159-61. PubMed ID: 21114756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Scientific and statistical reviews of manuscripts submitted to Nursing Research: Comparison of completeness, quality, and usefulness.
Henly SJ; Bennett JA; Dougherty MC
Nurs Outlook; 2010; 58(4):188-99. PubMed ID: 20637932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Upgrading our instructions for authors.
Schriger DL; Wears RL; Cooper RJ; Callaham ML
Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 41(4):565-7. PubMed ID: 12658258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Consider the source.
Mason DJ
Am J Nurs; 2009 Apr; 109(4):7. PubMed ID: 19325281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Stewards of the discipline: The role of referees and peer review.
Broome ME
Nurs Outlook; 2010; 58(4):169-70. PubMed ID: 20637926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Hitting the bull's eye rather than shooting yourself between the eyes.
Froman RD
Res Nurs Health; 2008 Oct; 31(5):399-401. PubMed ID: 18613067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Translation of the scientific method... Peer review.
Scarfe WC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Apr; 109(4):485-7. PubMed ID: 20176497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Peer review and the nursing literature.
Dougherty MC
Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):73. PubMed ID: 19289927
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. When R & R is not rest & recovery but revise & resubmit.
Bearinger LH; Taliaferro L; Given B
Res Nurs Health; 2010 Oct; 33(5):381-5. PubMed ID: 20827742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. How to get published in an international journal.
Fahy K
Women Birth; 2010 Jun; 23(2):43-4. PubMed ID: 20434718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [New ways].
Balzer K
Pflege Z; 2008 Jan; 61(1):1. PubMed ID: 18251185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
