769 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21048515)
1. Assessment of factors affecting the difference in intraocular pressure measurements between dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry.
Wang J; Cayer MM; Descovich D; Kamdeu-Fansi A; Harasymowycz PJ; Li G; Lesk MR
J Glaucoma; 2011 Oct; 20(8):482-7. PubMed ID: 21048515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes.
Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G
Eye (Lond); 2009 Feb; 23(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 18219335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: Difference of Intraocular Pressure Values Between Eyes with and without Glaucomatous Damage in Thin Corneas].
Umurhan Akkan JC; Akkan F; Sezgin Akcay BI; Ayintap E; Tuncer K
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2015 Oct; 232(10):1190-7. PubMed ID: 26512850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors affecting ocular pulse amplitude in eyes with open angle glaucoma and glaucoma-suspect eyes.
Choi J; Lee J; Park SB; Lee KS; Sung KR; Kook MS
Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 90(6):552-8. PubMed ID: 20560890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma practice.
Halkiadakis I; Patsea E; Chatzimichali K; Skouriotis S; Chalkidou S; Amariotakis G; Papakonstadinou D; Theodossiadis G; Amariotakis A; Georgopoulos G
Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 87(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 18631335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The relationship between diurnal variations in intraocular pressure measurements and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
Kotecha A; Crabb DP; Spratt A; Garway-Heath DF
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Sep; 50(9):4229-36. PubMed ID: 19407025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical comparison of pascal dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma.
Sullivan-Mee M; Halverson KD; Qualls C
J Glaucoma; 2007 Dec; 16(8):694-9. PubMed ID: 18091457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer.
Kotecha A; Elsheikh A; Roberts CR; Zhu H; Garway-Heath DF
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5337-47. PubMed ID: 17122122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma.
Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Banger A; Aggarwal K; Gupta A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry are not correlated with central corneal thickness in primary open angle glaucoma.
Regev G; Harris A; Siesky B; Shoshani Y; Egan P; Moss A; Zalish M; WuDunn D; Ehrlich R
J Glaucoma; 2011; 20(5):282-6. PubMed ID: 20577097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature radius on the intraocular pressure as measured by different tonometers: noncontact and goldmann applanation tonometers.
Harada Y; Hirose N; Kubota T; Tawara A
J Glaucoma; 2008 Dec; 17(8):619-25. PubMed ID: 19092456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of thin, thick, and normal corneas on Goldmann intraocular pressure measurements and correction formulae in individual eyes.
Park SJ; Ang GS; Nicholas S; Wells AP
Ophthalmology; 2012 Mar; 119(3):443-9. PubMed ID: 22035576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
Kotecha A; White ET; Shewry JM; Garway-Heath DF
Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Dec; 89(12):1572-5. PubMed ID: 16299132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Clinical assessment of dynamic contour tonometer].
Shi W; Zhong Y; Dong FT; Xu P; Wang RY
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 May; 44(5):408-12. PubMed ID: 18953894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Goldmann applanation and dynamic contour tonometry before and after cataract surgery.
Heinrich MA; Eppig T; Langenbucher A; Walter S; Behrens-Baumann W; Viestenz A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Apr; 38(4):683-9. PubMed ID: 22365580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Association of ocular hypotensive medication types with dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry measurements in a glaucoma and ocular hypertensive population.
Tzamalis A; Kynigopoulos M; Chalvatzis N; Dimitrakos S; Schlote T
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther; 2013 Feb; 29(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 23066787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ocular pulse amplitude in patients with asymmetric primary open-angle glaucoma.
Kac MJ; Solari HP; Velarde GC; Brazuna R; Cardoso GP; Ventura MP
Curr Eye Res; 2011 Aug; 36(8):727-32. PubMed ID: 21780922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Corneal hysteresis but not corneal thickness correlates with optic nerve surface compliance in glaucoma patients.
Wells AP; Garway-Heath DF; Poostchi A; Wong T; Chan KC; Sachdev N
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Aug; 49(8):3262-8. PubMed ID: 18316697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
