These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21048718)

  • 1. A painful remedy.
    Nature; 2010 Nov; 468(7320):6. PubMed ID: 21048718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dubious data remain in print two years after misconduct inquiry.
    Abbott A; Schwarz J
    Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6894):113. PubMed ID: 12110849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Publish or perish in China.
    Qiu J
    Nature; 2010 Jan; 463(7278):142-3. PubMed ID: 20075887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?
    Steen RG
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Apr; 37(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 21186208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retraction ends furore over cancer vaccine.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 2003 Sep; 425(6953):4. PubMed ID: 12955102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Misconduct is the main cause of life-sciences retractions.
    Corbyn Z
    Nature; 2012 Oct; 490(7418):21. PubMed ID: 23038445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The science of retraction.
    Nat Neurosci; 2002 Dec; 5(12):1249. PubMed ID: 12447375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Korean scandal will have global fallout.
    Check E; Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2005 Dec; 438(7071):1056-7. PubMed ID: 16371963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Iranian ministers in plagiarism row.
    Butler D
    Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7264):578-9. PubMed ID: 19794465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Negative results.
    Nature; 2008 May; 453(7193):258. PubMed ID: 18480760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fake peer-review in research publication: revisiting research purpose and academic integrity.
    Hadi MA
    Int J Pharm Pract; 2016 Oct; 24(5):309-10. PubMed ID: 27623702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fraud. The journal's role concerning fraudulent research.
    Sharp DW
    Invest Radiol; 1991 Jun; 26(6):586-9. PubMed ID: 1860767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Science publishing: The trouble with retractions.
    Van Noorden R
    Nature; 2011 Oct; 478(7367):26-8. PubMed ID: 21979026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retraction challenges.
    Nature; 2014 Oct; 514(7520):5. PubMed ID: 25279879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Further accusations rock Japanese RNA laboratory.
    Fuyuno I
    Nature; 2006 Apr; 440(7085):720-1. PubMed ID: 16598217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retractions: trends, implications, and possible further steps.
    Giglia E; Pescarmona GP
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2012 Jun; 48(2):339-43. PubMed ID: 22614895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Behind the scenes of scientific articles: defining categories of fraud and regulating cases].
    Pontille D; Torny D
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2012 Aug; 60(4):247-53. PubMed ID: 22819062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Special notice to readers and authors on scientific misconduct.
    Miller DR
    Can J Anaesth; 2009 Jun; 56(6):408-11. PubMed ID: 19330396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Journals: redundant publications are bad news.
    Mojon-Azzi SM; Jiang X; Wagner U; Mojon DS
    Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):209. PubMed ID: 12529610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Complacency about misconduct.
    Nature; 2004 Jan; 427(6969):1. PubMed ID: 14702049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.