136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21048869)
1. Process design and economics of on-site cellulase production on various carbon sources in a softwood-based ethanol plant.
Barta Z; Kovacs K; Reczey K; Zacchi G
Enzyme Res; 2010 Jun; 2010():734182. PubMed ID: 21048869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Energy considerations for a SSF-based softwood ethanol plant.
Wingren A; Galbe M; Zacchi G
Bioresour Technol; 2008 May; 99(7):2121-31. PubMed ID: 17900894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Techno-economic evaluation of producing ethanol from softwood: comparison of SSF and SHF and identification of bottlenecks.
Wingren A; Galbe M; Zacchi G
Biotechnol Prog; 2003; 19(4):1109-17. PubMed ID: 12892470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improved one-step steam pretreatment of SO2-impregnated softwood with time-dependent temperature profile for ethanol production.
Monavari S; Bennato A; Galbe M; Zacchi G
Biotechnol Prog; 2010; 26(4):1054-60. PubMed ID: 20730762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Techno-economic analysis of ethanol production from sugarcane bagasse using a Liquefaction plus Simultaneous Saccharification and co-Fermentation process.
Gubicza K; Nieves IU; Sagues WJ; Barta Z; Shanmugam KT; Ingram LO
Bioresour Technol; 2016 May; 208():42-48. PubMed ID: 26918837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost evaluation of cellulase enzyme for industrial-scale cellulosic ethanol production based on rigorous Aspen Plus modeling.
Liu G; Zhang J; Bao J
Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2016 Jan; 39(1):133-40. PubMed ID: 26541585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Process considerations and economic evaluation of two-step steam pretreatment for production of fuel ethanol from softwood.
Wingren A; Söderström J; Galbe M; Zacchi G
Biotechnol Prog; 2004; 20(5):1421-9. PubMed ID: 15458326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of substrate and cellulase concentration on simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of steam-pretreated softwood for ethanol production.
Stenberg K; Bollók M; Réczey K; Galbe M; Zacchi G
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2000 Apr; 68(2):204-10. PubMed ID: 10712736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Techno-economic evaluation of stillage treatment with anaerobic digestion in a softwood-to-ethanol process.
Barta Z; Reczey K; Zacchi G
Biotechnol Biofuels; 2010 Sep; 3():21. PubMed ID: 20843330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Techno-economical study of ethanol and biogas from spruce wood by NMMO-pretreatment and rapid fermentation and digestion.
Shafiei M; Karimi K; Taherzadeh MJ
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Sep; 102(17):7879-86. PubMed ID: 21684155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of reduction in yeast and enzyme concentrations in a simultaneous- saccharification-and-fermentation-based bioethanol process: technical and economic evaluation.
Wingren A; Galbe M; Roslander C; Rudolf A; Zacchi G
Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2005; 121-124():485-99. PubMed ID: 15920258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of double-step steam explosion pretreatment in bioethanol production from softwood.
Cotana F; Cavalaglio G; Gelosia M; Coccia V; Petrozzi A; Nicolini A
Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2014 Sep; 174(1):156-67. PubMed ID: 25030294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two-step steam pretreatment of softwood with SO2 impregnation for ethanol production.
Söderström J; Pilcher L; Galbe M; Zacchi G
Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2002; 98-100():5-21. PubMed ID: 12018277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of pretreatment and downstream processing technologies on economics and energy in cellulosic ethanol production.
Kumar D; Murthy GS
Biotechnol Biofuels; 2011 Sep; 4():27. PubMed ID: 21892958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Integrating enzyme fermentation in lignocellulosic ethanol production: life-cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis.
Olofsson J; Barta Z; Börjesson P; Wallberg O
Biotechnol Biofuels; 2017; 10():51. PubMed ID: 28250818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Techno-economic evaluation of a two-step biological process for hydrogen production.
Ljunggren M; Zacchi G
Biotechnol Prog; 2010; 26(2):496-504. PubMed ID: 20039381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Integration options for high energy efficiency and improved economics in a wood-to-ethanol process.
Sassner P; Zacchi G
Biotechnol Biofuels; 2008 Apr; 1(1):4. PubMed ID: 18471311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of washing on yield in one- and two-step steam pretreatment of softwood for production of ethanol.
Söderström J; Galbe M; Zacchi G
Biotechnol Prog; 2004; 20(3):744-9. PubMed ID: 15176877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Techno-economic evaluation of conditioning with sodium sulfite for bioethanol production from softwood.
Cavka A; Martín C; Alriksson B; Mörtsell M; Jönsson LJ
Bioresour Technol; 2015 Nov; 196():129-35. PubMed ID: 26232771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dry biorefining maximizes the potentials of simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation for cellulosic ethanol production.
Liu G; Zhang Q; Li H; Qureshi AS; Zhang J; Bao X; Bao J
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2018 Jan; 115(1):60-69. PubMed ID: 28865124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
