BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21050259)

  • 21. Influence of changing occlusal support on jaw-closing muscle electromyographic activity in healthy men and women.
    Wang MQ; He JJ; Wang K; Svensson P
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 19291503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of resilient liners on masticatory muscle activity of edentulous patients: clinical and electromyography studies.
    Bajoury S; Bassiouny MA
    Gen Dent; 2003; 51(5):410-5. PubMed ID: 15055629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Improvement and long-term stability of neuromuscular adaptation in implant-supported overdentures.
    Heckmann SM; Heussinger S; Linke JJ; Graef F; Pröschel P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1200-5. PubMed ID: 19832766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Surface EMG of jaw-elevator muscles and chewing pattern in complete denture wearers.
    Piancino MG; Farina D; Talpone F; Castroflorio T; Gassino G; Margarino V; Bracco P
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Dec; 32(12):863-70. PubMed ID: 16297032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Electromyographic assessment of jaw muscles in patients with All-on-Four fixed implant-supported prostheses.
    Dellavia C; Francetti L; Rosati R; Corbella S; Ferrario VF; Sforza C
    J Oral Rehabil; 2012 Dec; 39(12):896-904. PubMed ID: 22957827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. In vivo force measurements on maxillary implants supporting a fixed prosthesis or an overdenture: a pilot study.
    Mericske-Stern R; Venetz E; Fahrländer F; Bürgin W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Nov; 84(5):535-47. PubMed ID: 11105009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment.
    Awad MA; Lund JP; Dufresne E; Feine JS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 12737240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Adhesive-mediated enhancement of occlusal force measurements in patients with existing and new complete dentures: a pilot study.
    Wang YB; Chen YY
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):155-7. PubMed ID: 20305855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The masticatory efficiency of mandibular implant-supported overdentures as compared with tooth-supported overdentures and complete dentures.
    Chen L; Xie Q; Feng H; Lin Y; Li J
    J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(5):238-43. PubMed ID: 12498473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bite force and electromyograpy during maximum unilateral and bilateral clenching.
    van der Bilt A; Tekamp A; van der Glas H; Abbink J
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2008 Jun; 116(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 18471239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. EMG correlations of edentulous patients with implant overdentures and fixed dental prostheses compared to conventional complete dentures and dentates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    von der Gracht I; Derks A; Haselhuhn K; Wolfart S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jul; 28(7):765-773. PubMed ID: 27302014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Implant-supported prosthesis following Brånemark protocol on electromyography of masticatory muscles.
    Bersani E; Regalo SC; Siéssere S; Santos CM; Chimello DT; De Oliveira RH; Semprini M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2011 Sep; 38(9):668-73. PubMed ID: 21294764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bite forces after open or closed treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures.
    Ellis E; Throckmorton GS
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Apr; 59(4):389-95. PubMed ID: 11289168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Electromyography and bite force studies of muscular function and dysfunction in masticatory muscles.
    Hagberg C
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1986; 37():1-64. PubMed ID: 3465056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of the Mean Bite Force and Masticatory Performance of Maxillary and Mandibular Complete Dentures vs Mandibular Implant-supported Over Denture.
    Kumar A; Karthik KVGC; Sunkala L; Bejagam V; Rathore KK; Rai P
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 May; 23(5):513-519. PubMed ID: 35986459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Modulation of mastication during experimental loosening of complete dentures.
    Müller F; Heath MR; Ferman AM; Davis GR
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):553-8. PubMed ID: 12475161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Does a prosthodontist spend more time providing mandibular two-implant overdentures than conventional dentures?
    Takanashi Y; Penrod JR; Chehade A; Klemetti E; Savard A; Lund JP; Feine JS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(4):397-403. PubMed ID: 12170856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of experimental jaw muscle pain on EMG activity and bite force distribution at different level of clenching.
    Shimada A; Hara S; Svensson P
    J Oral Rehabil; 2013 Nov; 40(11):826-33. PubMed ID: 23992609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparisons of chewing difficulty of consumed foods with mandibular conventional dentures and implant-supported overdentures in diabetic denture wearers.
    Roumanas ED; Garrett NR; Hamada MO; Kapur KK
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(6):609-15. PubMed ID: 14714839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Biting Force and Muscle Activity in Implant-Supported Single Mandibular Overdentures Opposing Fixed Maxillary Dentition.
    Al-Magaleh WR; Abbas NA; Amer AA; Abdelkader AA; Bahgat B
    Implant Dent; 2016 Apr; 25(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 26684910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.