BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21050721)

  • 1. In vitro evaluation of insertion and removal torques of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Pithon MM; Nojima MG; Nojima LI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 40(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 21050721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanical evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants of different lengths.
    Pithon MM; Figueiredo DS; Oliveira DD
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 71(3):479-86. PubMed ID: 23273488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors affecting the long-term stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Motoyoshi M; Uemura M; Ono A; Okazaki K; Shigeeda T; Shimizu N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):588.e1-5; discussion 588-9. PubMed ID: 20451776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of bone quality, implant type, and implantation site preparation on insertion torques of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage.
    Wilmes B; Drescher D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 40(7):697-703. PubMed ID: 21458232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A torque removal study on the primary stability of orthodontic titanium screw mini-implants in the cortical bone of dog femurs.
    Okazaki J; Komasa Y; Sakai D; Kamada A; Ikeo T; Toda I; Suwa F; Inoue M; Etoh T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jul; 37(7):647-50. PubMed ID: 18554870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fracture resistance of orthodontic mini-implants: a biomechanical in vitro study.
    Wilmes B; Panayotidis A; Drescher D
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):396-401. PubMed ID: 21310766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An in vitro investigation of peak insertion torque values of six commercially available mini-implants.
    Whang CZ; Bister D; Sherriff M
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):660-6. PubMed ID: 21186241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with different cortical thickness: a laboratory study.
    Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Feb; 21(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 20070754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Removal torque values of surface-treated mini-implants after loading.
    Kim SH; Cho JH; Chung KR; Kook YA; Nelson G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18617101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microcomputed tomographic analysis of bone reaction at insertion of orthodontic mini-implants in sheep.
    Rebaudi A; Laffi N; Benedicenti S; Angiero F; Romanos GE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1233-40. PubMed ID: 22167428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Primary stability and histomorphometric bone-implant contact of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic microimplants.
    Çehreli S; Arman-Özçırpıcı A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Feb; 141(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 22284286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of self-tapping and self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants: an animal study of insertion torque and displacement under lateral loading.
    Su YY; Wilmes B; Hönscheid R; Drescher D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):404-11. PubMed ID: 19587861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of mini-implant length and diameter on primary stability under loading with two force levels.
    Chatzigianni A; Keilig L; Reimann S; Eliades T; Bourauel C
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 21062964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of autoclaving on the fracture torque of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage.
    Mattos CT; Ruellas AC; Sant'anna EF
    J Orthod; 2011 Mar; 38(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 21367824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of miniscrew taper morphology on insertion and removal torque in dogs.
    Cha JY; Takano-Yamamoto T; Hwang CJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):777-83. PubMed ID: 20657874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Horizontal pull-out strength of orthodontic infrazygomatic mini-implant: an in vitro study.
    Chen CM; Wu JH; Lu PC; Wang HC; Lee HE; Wang CH; Du JK
    Implant Dent; 2011 Apr; 20(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 21448023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of cortical thickness on the stability of mini-implants with microthreads.
    Vilani GN; Ruellas AC; Mattos CT; Fernandes DJ; Elias CN
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25627887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sequential bone healing of immediately loaded mini-implants.
    Serra G; Morais LS; Elias CN; Meyers MA; Andrade L; Muller C; Muller M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 18617102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fracture strength of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Assad-Loss TF; Kitahara-Céia FMF; Silveira GS; Elias CN; Mucha JN
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2017; 22(3):47-54. PubMed ID: 28746487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mini-implant behavior to shear tensile forces in the porcine mandible.
    Edwards CW; Mah JK
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):362-8. PubMed ID: 21491003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.