These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21051600)

  • 1. Lifebelt for UK science.
    Rees M
    Science; 2010 Nov; 330(6005):731. PubMed ID: 21051600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Federal boost for German science.
    Schiermeier Q
    Nature; 2014 Jun; 510(7503):19. PubMed ID: 24899285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A decisive effort?
    Smaglik P
    Nature; 2002 Aug; 418(6899):3. PubMed ID: 12181524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cuts force UK universities into "glamorous" medical research.
    Johnston K
    Nature; 1987 May 28-Jun 3; 327(6120):262. PubMed ID: 3587342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. World view: Save British science, again.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2010 Sep; 467(7313):269. PubMed ID: 20844513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An open letter to the administration on indirect costs.
    Pings CJ
    Acad Med; 1994 May; 69(5):356-8. PubMed ID: 8166915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Research Assessment Exercise is bad for UK medicine.
    Banatvala J; Bell P; Symonds M
    Lancet; 2005 Feb 5-11; 365(9458):458-60. PubMed ID: 15705444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. University cuts show science is far from saved.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2011 Jan; 469(7329):133. PubMed ID: 21228831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A future for British science.
    Richmond M
    Nature; 1991 Oct; 353(6343):379-82. PubMed ID: 1896079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. UK researchers highlight lack of funds for overheads.
    Verrall M
    Nature; 1995 Jan; 373(6510):93. PubMed ID: 7816106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. UK science funds in limbo.
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2010 Oct; 467(7318):894. PubMed ID: 20962813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Agricultural research. Ag schools say they can't afford budget boost.
    Avasthi A; Stokstad E
    Science; 2005 Feb; 307(5712):1031. PubMed ID: 15718442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. UK government lobbying for increased spending on universities intensifies.
    Birmingham K
    Nat Med; 1998 May; 4(5):539. PubMed ID: 9585210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Science budgets. U.K. government promises to shore up Britain's science base.
    Clery D
    Science; 2004 Jul; 305(5682):318. PubMed ID: 15256642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. UK government warned over 'catastrophic' cuts.
    Van Noorden R
    Nature; 2010 Jul; 466(7305):420-1. PubMed ID: 20651661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. France. €22 billion stimulus brings worries about egalité.
    Casassus B
    Science; 2012 Feb; 335(6069):644-5. PubMed ID: 22323789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The administrator: Jay Walsh.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2014 Apr; 344(6179):29. PubMed ID: 24700839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Research funding. Campaign for U.K. science helps deflect budget ax.
    Clery D
    Science; 2010 Oct; 330(6004):568-9. PubMed ID: 21030614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Universities' value.
    Nature; 2015 Nov; 527(7577):133-4. PubMed ID: 26560261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Australia boosts medical research, but keeps other budgets level.
    Pockley P
    Nature; 1999 May; 399(6732):94. PubMed ID: 10335832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.