These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1044 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21051831)

  • 1. [Comparison between pig lumbar zypapophyseal joint cartilage acquired from multiple magnetic resonance image sequences and gross specimens].
    Liao H; Yu W; Wang W; Liao Y
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2010 Oct; 35(10):1064-72. PubMed ID: 21051831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Study of comparing the multiple MR sequenc in the articular cartilage of knee joint].
    Gu F; Zhang XZ
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jan; 88(4):245-9. PubMed ID: 18361835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High-resolution cartilage imaging of the knee at 3T: basic evaluation of modern isotropic 3D MR-sequences.
    Friedrich KM; Reiter G; Kaiser B; Mayerhöfer M; Deimling M; Jellus V; Horger W; Trattnig S; Schweitzer M; Salomonowitz E
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Jun; 78(3):398-405. PubMed ID: 20138723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High-resolution proton density weighted three-dimensional fast spin echo (3D-FSE) of the knee with IDEAL at 1.5 Tesla: comparison with 3D-FSE and 2D-FSE--initial experience.
    McMahon CJ; Madhuranthakam AJ; Wu JS; Yablon CM; Wei JL; Rofsky NM; Hochman MG
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Feb; 35(2):361-9. PubMed ID: 22034221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Isotropic 3-dimensional fast spin echo imaging versus standard 2-dimensional imaging at 3.0 T of the knee: artificial cartilage and meniscal lesions in a porcine model.
    Ristow O; Stehling C; Krug R; Steinbach L; Sabo G; Ambekar A; Huber M; Link TM
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(2):260-9. PubMed ID: 20351518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the articular cartilage of the knee joint with vastly undersampled isotropic projection reconstruction steady-state free precession imaging.
    Kijowski R; Lu A; Block W; Grist T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jul; 24(1):168-75. PubMed ID: 16758476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score assessed with an isotropic three-dimensional true fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence at 3.0 Tesla.
    Welsch GH; Zak L; Mamisch TC; Resinger C; Marlovits S; Trattnig S
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):603-12. PubMed ID: 19692843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Driven equilibrium magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage: initial clinical experience.
    Gold GE; Fuller SE; Hargreaves BA; Stevens KJ; Beaulieu CF
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Apr; 21(4):476-81. PubMed ID: 15779031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MR imaging of articular cartilage at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of IDEAL 2D FSE and 3D SPGR with fat-saturated 2D FSE and 3D SPGR in a porcine model.
    Cha JG; Yoo JH; Rhee SJ; Hwang SS; Han JK
    Acta Radiol; 2014 May; 55(4):462-9. PubMed ID: 23943628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fat-suppressed spoiled GRASS imaging of knee hyaline cartilage: technique optimization and comparison with conventional MR imaging.
    Disler DG; Peters TL; Muscoreil SJ; Ratner LM; Wagle WA; Cousins JP; Rifkin MD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):887-92. PubMed ID: 8092029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. IDEAL 3D spoiled gradient echo of the articular cartilage of the knee on 3.0 T MRI: a comparison with conventional 3.0 T fast spin-echo T2 fat saturation image.
    Han CH; Park HJ; Lee SY; Chung EC; Choi SH; Yun JS; Rho MH
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Dec; 56(12):1479-86. PubMed ID: 25348476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: comparison between fat-suppressed three-dimensional SPGR imaging, fat-suppressed FSE imaging, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT imaging, and correlation with arthroscopy.
    Yoshioka H; Stevens K; Hargreaves BA; Steines D; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Winalski CS; Lang P
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):857-64. PubMed ID: 15503323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional double-echo steady-state (3D-DESS) magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: establishment of flip angles for evaluation of cartilage at 1.5 T and 3.0 T.
    Moriya S; Miki Y; Matsuno Y; Okada M
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Sep; 53(7):790-4. PubMed ID: 22850576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of T1-weighted fast spin-echo and T1-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images of the lumbar spine at 3.0 Tesla.
    Lavdas E; Vlychou M; Arikidis N; Kapsalaki E; Roka V; Fezoulidis IV
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Apr; 51(3):290-5. PubMed ID: 20170294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Magnetic resonance study of patellofemoral cartilage with a fat-suppressed T1-3D gradient-echo sequence: a comparison with other acquisition technics at medium field strength].
    Cardone G; Minio Paluello GB; Lo Presti G; Gagliardo O; Gallucci M; Castrucci M
    Radiol Med; 1997 Sep; 94(3):150-6. PubMed ID: 9446117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MR imaging of knee cartilage with FEMR.
    Vasnawala SS; Pauly JM; Nishimura DG; Gold GE
    Skeletal Radiol; 2002 Oct; 31(10):574-80. PubMed ID: 12324826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Imaging articular cartilage defects in the ankle joint with 3D fat-suppressed echo planar imaging: comparison with conventional 3D fat-suppressed gradient echo imaging.
    Ba-Ssalamah A; Schibany N; Puig S; Herneth AM; Noebauer-Huhmann IM; Trattnig S
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 Aug; 16(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 12203770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Magnetic resonance imaging of musculoskeletal lesions: comparison of three fat-saturation pulse sequences.
    Pui MH; Goh PS; Choo HF; Fok EC
    Australas Radiol; 1997 May; 41(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 9153802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy and precision in the detection of articular cartilage lesions using magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 Tesla in an in vitro study with orthopedic and histopathologic correlation.
    Schaefer FK; Kurz B; Schaefer PJ; Fuerst M; Hedderich J; Graessner J; Schuenke M; Heller H
    Acta Radiol; 2007 Dec; 48(10):1131-7. PubMed ID: 18038353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Magnetic resonance imaging of knee cartilage using a water selective balanced steady-state free precession sequence.
    Kornaat PR; Doornbos J; van der Molen AJ; Kloppenburg M; Nelissen RG; Hogendoorn PC; Bloem JL
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):850-6. PubMed ID: 15503345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 53.