337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21052008)
1. Bias formulas for sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounding for general outcomes, treatments, and confounders.
Vanderweele TJ; Arah OA
Epidemiology; 2011 Jan; 22(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 21052008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing the impact of unmeasured confounding for binary outcomes using confounding functions.
Kasza J; Wolfe R; Schuster T
Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 46(4):1303-1311. PubMed ID: 28338913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bias formulas for external adjustment and sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounders.
Arah OA; Chiba Y; Greenland S
Ann Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 18(8):637-46. PubMed ID: 18652982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of unmeasured within- and between-cluster confounding on the bias of effect estimatorsof a continuous exposure.
Li Y; Lee Y; Port FK; Robinson BM
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Aug; 29(8):2119-2139. PubMed ID: 31694489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimating Bias Due to Unmeasured Confounding in Oral Health Epidemiology.
Mittinty MN
Community Dent Health; 2020 Feb; 37(1):84-89. PubMed ID: 32031350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How unmeasured confounding in a competing risks setting can affect treatment effect estimates in observational studies.
Barrowman MA; Peek N; Lambie M; Martin GP; Sperrin M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):166. PubMed ID: 31366331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bias Analysis for Uncontrolled Confounding in the Health Sciences.
Arah OA
Annu Rev Public Health; 2017 Mar; 38():23-38. PubMed ID: 28125388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sensitivity analysis for the effects of multiple unmeasured confounders.
Groenwold RH; Sterne JA; Lawlor DA; Moons KG; Hoes AW; Tilling K
Ann Epidemiol; 2016 Sep; 26(9):605-11. PubMed ID: 27576907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adjustment for unmeasured confounding through informative priors for the confounder-outcome relation.
Groenwold RHH; Shofty I; Miočević M; van Smeden M; Klugkist I
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):174. PubMed ID: 30577773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of residual and unmeasured confounding in epidemiologic studies: a simulation study.
Fewell Z; Davey Smith G; Sterne JA
Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 166(6):646-55. PubMed ID: 17615092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Probe variables: a tool for identification of unmeasured confounders in an observational study].
Hong X; Yin JC; Wang B
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Apr; 42(4):735-739. PubMed ID: 34814460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bounding formulas for selection bias.
Huang TH; Lee WC
Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Nov; 182(10):868-72. PubMed ID: 26519426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bias Formulas for Estimating Direct and Indirect Effects When Unmeasured Confounding Is Present.
le Cessie S
Epidemiology; 2016 Jan; 27(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 26426943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigation of the structure and magnitude of time-varying uncontrolled confounding in simulated cohort data analyzed using g-computation.
Soohoo M; Arah OA
Int J Epidemiol; 2023 Dec; 52(6):1907-1913. PubMed ID: 37898996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A sensitivity analysis using information about measured confounders yielded improved uncertainty assessments for unmeasured confounding.
McCandless LC; Gustafson P; Levy AR
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Mar; 61(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 18226747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. To Adjust or Not to Adjust? When a "Confounder" Is Only Measured After Exposure.
Groenwold RHH; Palmer TM; Tilling K
Epidemiology; 2021 Mar; 32(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 33470711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [How to adjust confounders in studies on observational comparative effectiveness: (3) approaches on sensitivity analysis for confounder adjustment].
Huang LL; Zhao Y; Wei YY; Chen F
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 40(12):1645-1649. PubMed ID: 32062931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bias formulas for sensitivity analysis for direct and indirect effects.
VanderWeele TJ
Epidemiology; 2010 Jul; 21(4):540-51. PubMed ID: 20479643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Indirect adjustment of relative risks of an exposure with multiple categories for an unmeasured confounder.
Lubin JH; Hauptmann M; Blair A
Ann Epidemiol; 2018 Nov; 28(11):801-807. PubMed ID: 30297163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the impact of unmeasured confounders for credible and reliable real-world evidence.
Zhang X; Stamey JD; Mathur MB
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2020 Oct; 29(10):1219-1227. PubMed ID: 32929830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
