263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21052504)
1. Clinical outcomes of initial and repeated nasolacrimal duct office-based probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Cha DS; Lee H; Park MS; Lee JM; Baek SH
Korean J Ophthalmol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 21052504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nasolacrimal Duct Probing under Topical Anesthesia for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Taiwan.
Hung CH; Chen YC; Lin SL; Chen WL
Pediatr Neonatol; 2015 Dec; 56(6):402-7. PubMed ID: 26026949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nasolacrimal duct office probing in children under the age of 12 months: Cure rate and cost evaluation.
Le Garrec J; Abadie-Koebele C; Parienti JJ; Molgat Y; Degoumois A; Mouriaux F
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2016 Feb; 39(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 26826746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Endoscopically Assisted Primary Probing and Bicanalicular Silicone Intubation for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Children Aged 4 to 7 Years.
Arici C; Mergen B; Ozan T; Batu Oto B
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2023; 60(2):101-107. PubMed ID: 35446188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Initial nasolacrimal duct probing in children under age 5: cure rate and factors affecting success.
Kashkouli MB; Kassaee A; Tabatabaee Z
J AAPOS; 2002 Dec; 6(6):360-3. PubMed ID: 12506276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High incidence and recurrence of tympanostomy tube procedures in children who underwent nasolacrimal duct probe and intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Vicinanzo MG; Cooper KM; Gerber AL; Long J; McGwin G
J AAPOS; 2023 Oct; 27(5):286.e1-286.e4. PubMed ID: 37734706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nasal endoscopy-guided primary nasolacrimal duct intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children older than 4 years.
Arici C; Oto BB
Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Mar; 43(3):1005-1011. PubMed ID: 36053476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Success rates of probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction at various ages.
Świerczyńska M; Tobiczyk E; Rodak P; Barchanowska D; Filipek E
BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Oct; 20(1):403. PubMed ID: 33032542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of age on primary balloon dacryocystoplasty and probing success in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Dericioğlu V; Sevik MO; Saçu SS; Eraslan M; Çerman E
Int Ophthalmol; 2022 Nov; 42(11):3547-3554. PubMed ID: 35598226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Success Rate of Probing for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Children.
Valcheva KP; Murgova SV; Krivoshiiska EK
Folia Med (Plovdiv); 2019 Mar; 61(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 31237856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction update study (CUP study): Paper II - Profile and outcomes of complex CNLDO and masquerades.
Bansal O; Bothra N; Sharma A; Ali MJ
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Dec; 139():110407. PubMed ID: 33068946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Impact of lacrimal obstruction type on the efficacy of probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction].
Zhao W; Chen LL; Xiang DM
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Sep; 92(35):2477-80. PubMed ID: 23158713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of balloon dacryocystoplasty to probing as the primary treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Gunton KB; Chung CW; Schnall BM; Prieto D; Wexler A; Koller HP
J AAPOS; 2001 Jun; 5(3):139-42. PubMed ID: 11404738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors affecting the success of nasolacrimal duct probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Mannor GE; Rose GE; Frimpong-Ansah K; Ezra E
Am J Ophthalmol; 1999 May; 127(5):616-7. PubMed ID: 10334364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pushed monocanalicular intubation versus probing for the treatment of simple and incomplete complex types of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children older than 18 months old.
Eshraghi B; Khalilipour E; Ameli K; Bazvand F; Mirmohammadsadeghi A
Orbit; 2017 Aug; 36(4):218-222. PubMed ID: 28627958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of Probing in Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Children Older Than 2 Years.
Une VL; Kulkarni SS; Nandedkar VS
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2019 May; 56(3):141-145. PubMed ID: 31116859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The prevalence of amblyogenic factors in children with persistent congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Eshraghi B; Akbari MR; Fard MA; Shahsanaei A; Assari R; Mirmohammadsadeghi A
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014 Nov; 252(11):1847-52. PubMed ID: 24777709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in older children.
Eshragi B; Fard MA; Masomian B; Akbari M
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2013; 20(4):349-52. PubMed ID: 24339688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Success rates of dacryoendoscopy-guided probing for recalcitrant congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Fujimoto M; Ogino K; Matsuyama H; Miyazaki C
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2016 Jul; 60(4):274-9. PubMed ID: 27116947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction: Comparison of Two Different Treatment Algorithms.
Napier ML; Armstrong DJ; McLoone SF; McLoone EM
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2016 Sep; 53(5):285-91. PubMed ID: 27486727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
