These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21053774)

  • 1. Parameter study for the finite element modelling of long bones with computed-tomography-imaging-based stiffness distribution.
    Wullschleger L; Weisse B; Blaser D; Fürst AE
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010; 224(9):1095-107. PubMed ID: 21053774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computed-tomography-based finite-element models of long bones can accurately capture strain response to bending and torsion.
    Varghese B; Short D; Penmetsa R; Goswami T; Hangartner T
    J Biomech; 2011 Apr; 44(7):1374-9. PubMed ID: 21288523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
    Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relating age and micro-architecture with apparent-level elastic constants: a micro-finite element study of female cortical bone from the anterior femoral midshaft.
    Donaldson FE; Pankaj P; Cooper DM; Thomas CD; Clement JG; Simpson AH
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 Jun; 225(6):585-96. PubMed ID: 22034742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensitivities of biomechanical assessment methods for fracture healing of long bones.
    Chen G; Wu FY; Zhang JQ; Zhong GQ; Liu F
    Med Eng Phys; 2015 Jul; 37(7):650-6. PubMed ID: 25983068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patient-specific finite-element analyses of the proximal femur with orthotropic material properties validated by experiments.
    Trabelsi N; Yosibash Z
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 Jun; 133(6):061001. PubMed ID: 21744921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Micromechanics-based conversion of CT data into anisotropic elasticity tensors, applied to FE simulations of a mandible.
    Hellmich C; Kober C; Erdmann B
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2008 Jan; 36(1):108-22. PubMed ID: 17952601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting the yield of the proximal femur using high-order finite-element analysis with inhomogeneous orthotropic material properties.
    Yosibash Z; Tal D; Trabelsi N
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2010 Jun; 368(1920):2707-23. PubMed ID: 20439270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Orthotropic properties of cancellous bone modelled as parameterized cellular material.
    Kowalczyk P
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2006 Jun; 9(3):135-47. PubMed ID: 16880164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High resolution bone material property assignment yields robust subject specific finite element models of complex thin bone structures.
    Pakdel A; Fialkov J; Whyne CM
    J Biomech; 2016 Jun; 49(9):1454-1460. PubMed ID: 27033728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Finite element models predict cancellous apparent modulus when tissue modulus is scaled from specimen CT-attenuation.
    Bourne BC; van der Meulen MC
    J Biomech; 2004 May; 37(5):613-21. PubMed ID: 15046990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Elastic properties of cancellous bone derived from finite element models of parameterized microstructure cells.
    Kowalczyk P
    J Biomech; 2003 Jul; 36(7):961-72. PubMed ID: 12757805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Elastic anisotropy of bone lamellae as a function of fibril orientation pattern.
    Reisinger AG; Pahr DH; Zysset PK
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2011 Feb; 10(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 20422246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimation of the Young's modulus of the human pars tensa using in-situ pressurization and inverse finite-element analysis.
    Rohani SA; Ghomashchi S; Agrawal SK; Ladak HM
    Hear Res; 2017 Mar; 345():69-78. PubMed ID: 28087415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are tensile and compressive Young's moduli of compact bone different?
    Barak MM; Currey JD; Weiner S; Shahar R
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2009 Jan; 2(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 19627807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Constructing anisotropic finite element model of bone from computed tomography (CT).
    Kazembakhshi S; Luo Y
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):2619-26. PubMed ID: 25226965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Specimen-specific beam models for fast and accurate prediction of human trabecular bone mechanical properties.
    van Lenthe GH; Stauber M; Müller R
    Bone; 2006 Dec; 39(6):1182-9. PubMed ID: 16949356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of boundary conditions on computed apparent elastic properties of cancellous bone.
    Pahr DH; Zysset PK
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2008 Dec; 7(6):463-76. PubMed ID: 17972122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consideration of multiple load cases is critical in modelling orthotropic bone adaptation in the femur.
    Geraldes DM; Modenese L; Phillips AT
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2016 Oct; 15(5):1029-42. PubMed ID: 26578078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bone stiffness changes due to microdamage under different loadings.
    Pidaparti RM; Liu Y
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1997; 7(3):193-203. PubMed ID: 9262832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.