271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21054199)
1. The effect of different preparation and etching procedures on the microleakage of direct composite veneer restorations.
Gorucu J; Gurgan S; Cakir FY; Bicer CO; Gorucu H
Photomed Laser Surg; 2011 Mar; 29(3):205-11. PubMed ID: 21054199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microleakage of composite resin restorations in cervical cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser radiation.
Shahabi S; Ebrahimpour L; Walsh LJ
Aust Dent J; 2008 Jun; 53(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 18494974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Er,Cr:YSGG Laser Handpieces for Class II Preparation and Microleakage of Silorane- or Methacrylate-Based Composite Restorations.
Ergin E; Oz FD; Gurgan S
Photomed Laser Surg; 2018 Sep; 36(9):499-505. PubMed ID: 30188252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microleakage study of different adhesive systems in Class V cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser and bur preparation.
Ergucu Z; Celik EU; Turkun M
Gen Dent; 2007; 55(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17333962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of Acid Etching on Long-term Microleakage of Nano Ionomer Restorations in Burand Laser-prepared Cavities in Primary Teeth.
Shafiei F; Memarpour M
J Dent Child (Chic); 2015; 82(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 25909836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microleakage of compomer restorations in primary teeth after preparation with bur or air abrasion.
Aysegül O; Nurhan O; Haluk B; Dilek T
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 15853100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microleakage of Er:YAG laser and dental bur prepared cavities in primary teeth restored with different adhesive restorative materials.
Baghalian A; Nakhjavani YB; Hooshmand T; Motahhary P; Bahramian H
Lasers Med Sci; 2013 Nov; 28(6):1453-60. PubMed ID: 23135785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of different types of adhesive systems on the microleakage of compomer restorations in Class V cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser in primary teeth.
Baygin O; Korkmaz FM; Arslan I
Dent Mater J; 2012; 31(2):206-14. PubMed ID: 22447053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro microleakage of composite restorations prepared by Er:YAG/Er,Cr:YSGG lasers and conventional drills associated with two adhesive systems.
Moldes VL; Capp CI; Navarro RS; Matos AB; Youssef MN; Cassoni A
J Adhes Dent; 2009 Jun; 11(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 19603586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microleakage of glass ionomer restoration in cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation in primary teeth.
Rossi RR; Aranha AC; Eduardo Cde P; Ferreira LS; Navarro RS; Zezell DM
J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 18647510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the Er,Cr:YSGG laser with a chemical vapour deposition bur and conventional techniques for cavity preparation: a microleakage study.
Yazici AR; Yıldırım Z; Antonson SA; Kilinc E; Koch D; Antonson DE; Dayangaç B; Ozgünaltay G
Lasers Med Sci; 2012 Jan; 27(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 20842517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sealing of silorane-based composite in laser-prepared primary teeth: effect of acid etching.
Shafiei F; Memarpour M; Fekrazad R
Pediatr Dent; 2014; 36(5):378-83. PubMed ID: 25303503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microleakage of class V cavities with different adhesive systems prepared by a diamond instrument and different parameters of Er:YAG laser irradiation.
Attar N; Korkmaz Y; Ozel E; Bicer CO; Firatli E
Photomed Laser Surg; 2008 Dec; 26(6):585-91. PubMed ID: 19099387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro analysis of the effects of acid or laser etching on microleakage around composite resin restorations.
Yazici AR; Frentzen M; Dayangac B
J Dent; 2001 Jul; 29(5):355-61. PubMed ID: 11472808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after bur, air-abrasion or Er:YAG laser preparation.
Corona SA; Borsatto M; Dibb RG; Ramos RP; Brugnera A; Pécora JD
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(5):491-7. PubMed ID: 11551014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microleakage of repaired class V silorane and nano-hybrid composite restorations after preparation with erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser and diamond bur.
Yaman BC; Efes BG; Dörter C; Gömeç Y; Erdilek D; Yazıcıoğlu O
Lasers Med Sci; 2011 Mar; 26(2):163-70. PubMed ID: 20162317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of microleakage of three adhesive systems in class V composite restorations prepared with Er,Cr:YSGG laser.
Kimyai S; Ajami AA; Chaharom ME; Oskoee JS
Photomed Laser Surg; 2010 Aug; 28(4):505-10. PubMed ID: 20001320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of marginal microleakage of flowable composite restorations in primary molars prepared by high-speed carbide bur, Er:YAG laser, and air abrasion.
Borsatto MC; Corona SA; Chinelatti MA; Ramos RP; de Sá Rocha RA; Pecora JD; Palma-Dibb RG
J Dent Child (Chic); 2006; 73(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 16948375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Er,Cr:YSGG laser influence on microleakage of class V composite resin restorations.
Fattah T; Kazemi H; Fekrazad R; Assadian H; Kalhori KA
Lasers Med Sci; 2013 Sep; 28(5):1257-62. PubMed ID: 23010956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
