These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21054470)

  • 21. Differences in the accommodation stimulus response curves of adult myopes and emmetropes.
    Abbott ML; Schmid KL; Strang NC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1998 Jan; 18(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 9666906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dynamic accommodation responses following adaptation to defocus.
    Cufflin MP; Mallen EA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Oct; 85(10):982-91. PubMed ID: 18832977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Myopes Show Greater Visually Induced Postural Responses Than Emmetropes.
    Sayah DN; Asaad K; Hanssens JM; Giraudet G; Faubert J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Feb; 57(2):551-6. PubMed ID: 26873515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Nearwork-induced changes in lenticular thickness in different refractive groups.
    Vasudevan B; Ciuffreda KJ
    Optometry; 2011 Nov; 82(11):662-6. PubMed ID: 22027698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of blur adaptation on accommodative response and pupil size during reading.
    Le R; Bao J; Chen D; He JC; Lu F
    J Vis; 2010 Dec; 10(14):1. PubMed ID: 21131561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Eye elongation during accommodation in humans: differences between emmetropes and myopes.
    Drexler W; Findl O; Schmetterer L; Hitzenberger CK; Fercher AF
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1998 Oct; 39(11):2140-7. PubMed ID: 9761293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effects of spatial frequency on the accommodation responses of myopes and emmetropes under various detection demands.
    Xu J; Zheng Z; Drobe B; Jiang J; Chen H
    Vision Res; 2015 Oct; 115(Pt A):1-7. PubMed ID: 26218290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cross-sectional sample of peripheral refraction in four meridians in myopes and emmetropes.
    Ehsaei A; Mallen EA; Chisholm CM; Pacey IE
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(10):7574-85. PubMed ID: 21873675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Vergence driven accommodation with simulated disparity in myopia and emmetropia.
    Maiello G; Kerber KL; Thorn F; Bex PJ; Vera-Diaz FA
    Exp Eye Res; 2018 Jan; 166():96-105. PubMed ID: 29051012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Analysis of head position used by myopes and emmetropes when performing a near-vision reading task.
    Hartwig A; Gowen E; Charman WN; Radhakrishnan H
    Vision Res; 2011 Jul; 51(14):1712-7. PubMed ID: 21663755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accommodation-induced intraocular pressure changes in progressing myopes and emmetropes.
    Yan L; Huibin L; Xuemin L
    Eye (Lond); 2014 Nov; 28(11):1334-40. PubMed ID: 25190534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Retinal image quality during accommodation in adult myopic eyes.
    Sreenivasan V; Aslakson E; Kornaus A; Thibos LN
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Nov; 90(11):1292-303. PubMed ID: 24152885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Uniformity of accommodation across the visual field.
    Liu T; Sreenivasan V; Thibos LN
    J Vis; 2016; 16(3):6. PubMed ID: 26842859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment of corneal biomechanical parameters in myopes and emmetropes using the Corvis ST.
    Lee R; Chang RT; Wong IY; Lai JS; Lee JW; Singh K
    Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Mar; 99(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 26893029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of accommodative adaptation on static and dynamic accommodation in emmetropia and late-onset myopia.
    Jiang BC; White JM
    Optom Vis Sci; 1999 May; 76(5):295-302. PubMed ID: 10375245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Retinal adaptation responses revealed by global flash multifocal electroretinogram are dependent on the degree of myopic refractive error.
    Chen JC; Brown B; Schmid KL
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(20):3413-21. PubMed ID: 16647734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Off-axis partial coherence interferometry in myopes and emmetropes.
    Ehsaei A; Chisholm CM; Pacey IE; Mallen EA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Jan; 33(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 23170781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Refractive group differences in accommodation microfluctuations with changing accommodation stimulus.
    Day M; Strang NC; Seidel D; Gray LS; Mallen EA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Jan; 26(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 16390487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dynamic accommodation and myopia.
    Culhane HM; Winn B
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Aug; 40(9):1968-74. PubMed ID: 10440250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Visual performance in emmetropia and low myopia after correction of high-order aberrations.
    Rossi EA; Weiser P; Tarrant J; Roorda A
    J Vis; 2007 Jun; 7(8):14. PubMed ID: 17685821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.