These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21055107)

  • 1. [Impaction morselized allografting combined with cementless long stem for femoral defects in femoral component revision].
    Yang J; Kang PD; Shen B; Zhou ZK; Pei FX
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Jul; 48(14):1055-9. PubMed ID: 21055107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Cemented versus cementless revision femoral stems using morselized allograft--a prospective, randomized study with 5 years follow-up].
    Nesse E; Nielsen EW; Bastian D
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(6):678-83. PubMed ID: 14679434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Femoral impaction allografting for significant bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty.
    Goff TAJ; Bobak P
    Hip Int; 2017 May; 27(3):281-285. PubMed ID: 28165587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impaction allografting for massive femoral defects in revision hip arthroplasty using collared textured stems.
    Van Kleunen JP; Anbari KK; Vu D; Garino JP
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Apr; 21(3):362-71. PubMed ID: 16627144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Management of the bone defects in revision total hip arthroplasty].
    Wang Y; Zhou YG
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Oct; 43(20):1309-12. PubMed ID: 16271241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impaction grafting for femoral component revision using a non-polished bead-blasted chrome cobalt stem-average 8 1/2-year follow-up.
    Krupp RJ; Malkani AL; Crawford CH; Capello WN; Feinberg JR; Baker D
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Dec; 21(8):1180-6. PubMed ID: 17162179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extended trochanteric osteotomy followed by cemented impaction allografting in revision hip arthroplasty.
    Charity J; Tsiridis E; Gusmão D; Bauze A; Timperley J; Gie G
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Jan; 28(1):154-60. PubMed ID: 23084555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impaction bone grafting using freeze-dried allograft in revision hip arthroplasty.
    de Roeck NJ; Drabu KJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2001 Feb; 16(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 11222894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Long-term results of the Schenker cementless femoral component].
    Dzupa V; Cech O; Sesták M; Klézl Z
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2004; 71(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 15151096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Morselized bone grafting in revision arthroplasty of the knee: a retrospective analysis of 34 reconstructions after 2-9 years.
    Steens W; Loehr JF; Wodtke J; Katzer A
    Acta Orthop; 2008 Oct; 79(5):683-8. PubMed ID: 18839376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impaction bone grafting for total hip revision.
    Gore DR
    Int Orthop; 2002; 26(3):162-5. PubMed ID: 12073109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impaction bone grafting with hydroxyapatite: increased femoral component stability in experiments using Sawbones.
    Fujishiro T; Nishikawa T; Niikura T; Takikawa S; Nishiyama T; Mizuno K; Yoshiya S; Kurosaka M
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Aug; 76(4):550-4. PubMed ID: 16195073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cementless modular hip revision arthroplasty using the MRP Titan Revision Stem: outcome of 79 hips after an average of 4 years' follow-up.
    Schuh A; Werber S; Holzwarth U; Zeiler G
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2004 Jun; 124(5):306-9. PubMed ID: 15064958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revision hip arthroplasty using strut allografts and fully porous-coated stems.
    Kim YH; Kim JS
    J Arthroplasty; 2005 Jun; 20(4):454-9. PubMed ID: 16124960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Femoral revision with a fluted, tapered, modular stem seventy patients followed for a mean of 3.9 years.
    McInnis DP; Horne G; Devane PA
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Apr; 21(3):372-80. PubMed ID: 16627145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Personal experience with the Wagner revision stem in hip joint reoperations].
    Cech O; Stehlík J; Krbec M; Vrecion V
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(3):148-61. PubMed ID: 11706537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impaction allografting with cement for extensive femoral bone loss in revision hip surgery: a 4- to 8-year follow-up study.
    Fetzer GB; Callaghan JJ; Templeton JE; Goetz DD; Sullivan PM; Johnston RC
    J Arthroplasty; 2001 Dec; 16(8 Suppl 1):195-202. PubMed ID: 11742475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Femoral revision using long hydroxyapatite-coated interlocking stem.
    Malhotra R; Dua A; Kiran EK; Bhan S
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Apr; 128(4):355-62. PubMed ID: 17457595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rapid bone and blood flow formation in impacted morselized allografts: positron emission tomography (PET) studies on allografts in 5 femoral component revisions of total hip arthroplasty.
    Sörensen J; Ullmark G; Långström B; Nilsson O
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2003 Dec; 74(6):633-43. PubMed ID: 14763691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Femoral reconstruction with endosteal bone allografts protected by a metallic mesh in reoperation of total hip prosthesis. 19 cases with an average follow-up of 83 months].
    Migaud H; Jardin C; Fontaine C; Pierchon F; d'Herbomez O; Duquennoy A
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1997; 83(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 9452810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.