These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21055514)

  • 1. Evaluation of the introduction of robotic technology on route of hysterectomy and complications in the first year of use.
    Matthews CA; Reid N; Ramakrishnan V; Hull K; Cohen S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Nov; 203(5):499.e1-5. PubMed ID: 21055514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy.
    Magrina JF; Kho RM; Weaver AL; Montero RP; Magtibay PM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Apr; 109(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 18279944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy: our early experience.
    Vasilescu C; Sgarbură O; Tudor S; Popa M; Turcanu A; Florescu A; Herlea V; Anghel R
    Chirurgia (Bucur); 2009; 104(4):393-7. PubMed ID: 19886045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotic radical hysterectomy in the management of gynecologic malignancies.
    Pareja R; Ramirez PT
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(6):673-6. PubMed ID: 18774759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surgical techniques: robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy with the da Vinci surgical system.
    Advincula AP
    Int J Med Robot; 2006 Dec; 2(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 17520648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Turkey's experience of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: a series of 25 consecutive cases.
    Göçmen A; Sanlikan F; Uçar MG
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 Aug; 282(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 19838722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
    Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
    Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
    Payne TN; Dauterive FR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.
    DeNardis SA; Holloway RW; Bigsby GE; Pikaart DP; Ahmad S; Finkler NJ
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):412-7. PubMed ID: 18834620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
    Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic hysterectomy: technique and initial outcomes.
    Kho RM; Hilger WS; Hentz JG; Magtibay PM; Magrina JF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jul; 197(1):113.e1-4. PubMed ID: 17618782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy without uterine manipulator: description of a new technique and its outcome.
    Kavallaris A; Chalvatzas N; Kelling K; Bohlmann MK; Diedrich K; Hornemann A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 May; 283(5):1053-7. PubMed ID: 20449598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Laparoscopic hysterectomy. A series of 318 consecutive cases].
    Masson FN; Pouly JL; Canis M; Mage G; Wattiez A; Pomel C; Glowaczover E; Bruhat MA
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1996; 25(4):340-52. PubMed ID: 8815132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pilot study assessing robotic laparoscopic hysterectomy and patient outcomes.
    Fiorentino RP; Zepeda MA; Goldstein BH; John CR; Rettenmaier MA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 16431325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Total hysterectomy for benign pathologies. Laparoscopic surgery does not seem to increase the risk of complications].
    Chapron C; Dubuisson JB; Ansquer Y; Fernandez B
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1998 Jan; 27(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 9583046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotic radical hysterectomy.
    Fanning J; Hojat R; Johnson J; Fenton B
    Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Feb; 61(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 19204661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy.
    Estape R; Lambrou N; Diaz R; Estape E; Dunkin N; Rivera A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jun; 113(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 19345987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic radical hysterectomy. A literature review.
    Smith AL; Pareja R; Ramirez PT
    Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Aug; 61(4):339-46. PubMed ID: 19745798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Complications and results of 361 hysterectomies performed at laparoscopy.
    Nezhat F; Nezhat CH; Admon D; Gordon S; Nezhat C
    J Am Coll Surg; 1995 Mar; 180(3):307-16. PubMed ID: 7874341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.