BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21055590)

  • 21. Components of anterior crossbite in the primary dentition.
    Tsai HH
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2001; 68(1):27-32, 10. PubMed ID: 11324403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessment of the reliability and repeatability of landmarks using 3-D cephalometric software.
    Frongia G; Piancino MG; Bracco AA; Crincoli V; Debernardi CL; Bracco P
    Cranio; 2012 Oct; 30(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23156966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Treatment of adult Class III malocclusions with orthodontic therapy or orthognathic surgery: receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Tseng YC; Pan CY; Chou ST; Liao CY; Lai ST; Chen CM; Chang HP; Yang YH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):e485-93. PubMed ID: 21536190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull.
    Berco M; Rigali PH; Miner RM; DeLuca S; Anderson NK; Will LA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):17.e1-9; discussion 17-8. PubMed ID: 19577142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The use of three-dimensional cephalometric references in dentoskeletal symmetry diagnosis.
    Porto OC; de Freitas JC; de Alencar AH; Estrela C
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(6):78-85. PubMed ID: 25628083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Gender differences in dentofacial characteristics of adult patients with temporomandibular disc displacement.
    Kwon HB; Kim H; Jung WS; Kim TW; Ahn SJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 71(7):1178-86. PubMed ID: 23455416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cephalometric study to test the reliability of anteroposterior skeletal discrepancy indicators using the twin block appliance.
    Trivedi R; Bhattacharya A; Mehta F; Patel D; Parekh H; Gandhi V
    Prog Orthod; 2015 Feb; 16():3. PubMed ID: 25769138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Differences in skeletal Class II diagnosis using various cephalometric analyses.
    Contardo L; Ceschi M; Castaldo A; Denotti G; Di Lenarda R
    J Clin Orthod; 2008 Jul; 42(7):389-92. PubMed ID: 18794575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Diagnostic model of anterior open bite--a new way to predict skeletal type: a cross-sectional study.
    Urzal V; Braga AC; Ferreira AP
    Int Orthod; 2014 Sep; 12(3):358-70. PubMed ID: 25087172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Eastman Standard Incisor Angulations: are they still appropriate?
    MacAllister MJ; Rock WP
    Br J Orthod; 1992 Feb; 19(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1562579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Craniofacial profile in Southern Chinese with hypodontia.
    Chan DW; Samman N; McMillan AS
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19193707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cephalometric findings in patients with Papillon-Lefèvre syndrome.
    Bindayel NA; Ullbro C; Suri L; Al-Farra E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):138-44. PubMed ID: 18617113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cranial base angulation in Brazilian patients seeking orthodontic treatment.
    Alves PV; Mazuchelli J; Patel PK; Bolognese AM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 19(2):334-8. PubMed ID: 18362708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reproducibility of measurements in tablet-assisted, PC-aided, and manual cephalometric analysis.
    Goracci C; Ferrari M
    Angle Orthod; 2014 May; 84(3):437-42. PubMed ID: 24160993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Landmark identification error in posterior anterior cephalometrics.
    Major PW; Johnson DE; Hesse KL; Glover KE
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(6):447-54. PubMed ID: 7864466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Predictability of prebent advancement plates for use in maxillomandibular advancement surgery.
    Lye KW; Waite PD; Wang D; Sittitavornwong S
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Aug; 66(8):1625-9. PubMed ID: 18634950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accuracy of landmark identification on postero-anterior cephalograms.
    Sicurezza E; Greco M; Giordano D; Maiorana F; Leonardi R
    Prog Orthod; 2012 Sep; 13(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 23021116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Validity and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements obtained from digital photographs of analogue headfilms.
    Grybauskas S; Balciuniene I; Vetra J
    Stomatologija; 2007; 9(4):114-20. PubMed ID: 18303276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of extraction and non-extraction treatment effects by two different superimposition methods.
    Türköz Ç; İşcan HN
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):691-9. PubMed ID: 21378094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of manual traced images and corresponding scanned radiographs digitally traced.
    Naoumova J; Lindman R
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):247-53. PubMed ID: 19342425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.