These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21055590)

  • 41. Does hyoid bone resection according to Sistrunk influence normal craniofacial growth? A cephalometric study.
    Joss-Vassalli IM; Joss CU; Gebauer U
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2275-82. PubMed ID: 19761923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Procuste cephalometry].
    Penin X
    Orthod Fr; 2006 Dec; 77(4):407-15. PubMed ID: 17402222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparison of landmark identification and linear and angular measurements in conventional and digital cephalometry.
    Akhare PJ; Dagab AM; Alle RS; Shenoyd U; Garla V
    Int J Comput Dent; 2013; 16(3):241-54. PubMed ID: 24364195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of hand-traced and computer-based cephalometric superimpositions.
    Huja SS; Grubaugh EL; Rummel AM; Fields HW; Beck FM
    Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):428-35. PubMed ID: 19413396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures.
    Costa F; Robiony M; Sembronio S; Polini F; Politi M
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(3):179-92. PubMed ID: 12387609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Characteristics of Down syndrome subjects in a Saudi sample.
    Korayem MA; AlKofide EA
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 23745979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion.
    Cozza P; Baccetti T; Mucedero M; Pavoni C; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 20816299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The reproducibility of cephalometric measurements: a comparison of analogue and digital methods.
    Ongkosuwito EM; Katsaros C; van 't Hof MA; Bodegom JC; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2002 Dec; 24(6):655-65. PubMed ID: 12512783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Craniofacial morphology and inclination of the posterior slope of the articular eminence in female patients with and without condylar bone change.
    Estomaguio GA; Yamada K; Ochi K; Hayashi T; Hanada K
    Cranio; 2005 Oct; 23(4):257-63. PubMed ID: 16353465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Automated cephalometry: system performance reliability using landmark-dependent criteria.
    Tanikawa C; Yagi M; Takada K
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1037-46. PubMed ID: 19852592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Precision of cephalometric landmark identification: cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional cephalometric views.
    Ludlow JB; Gubler M; Cevidanes L; Mol A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):312.e1-10; discussion 312-3. PubMed ID: 19732656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Orthodontists' and laypersons' aesthetic assessment of Class III subjects referred for orthognathic surgery.
    Fabré M; Mossaz C; Christou P; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 19395371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) - generated frontal cephalograms.
    Kim SJ; Park SB; Kim YI; Cho BH; Hwang DS
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):e331-6. PubMed ID: 22444351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Change of lip-line cant after 1-jaw orthognathic surgery in patients with mandibular asymmetry.
    Hwang HS; Min YS; Lee SC; Sun MK; Lim HS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):564-9. PubMed ID: 19815160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Dentofacial morphology of mouth breathing children.
    Faria PT; de Oliveira Ruellas AC; Matsumoto MA; Anselmo-Lima WT; Pereira FC
    Braz Dent J; 2002; 13(2):129-32. PubMed ID: 12238804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. An assessment of skeletal craniofacial asymmetry in South Indian population.
    Taneja VK; Kumar GA; Farishta S; Minocha RC; Baiju G; Gopal D
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jan; 13(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 22430699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Cephalometric features of patients referred for orthodontic treatment at the Dentistry Department of Dakar University].
    Diouf JS; Badiane A; Ngom PI; Niagha G; Diop-Bâ K; Diagne F
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2010 Sep; 33(131):27-34. PubMed ID: 21328926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Bite force and maxillofacial morphology in patients with Duchenne-type muscular dystrophy.
    Ueki K; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jan; 65(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 17174761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparison between conventional and cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms.
    Cattaneo PM; Bloch CB; Calmar D; Hjortshøj M; Melsen B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):798-802. PubMed ID: 19061807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Cephalometric evaluation of patients with anterior open-bite.
    Stuani AS; Matsumoto MA; Stuani MB
    Braz Dent J; 2000; 11(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 11210273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.