179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21055995)
1. Normal kinematics of the upper cervical spine during the Flexion-Rotation Test - In vivo measurements using magnetic resonance imaging.
Takasaki H; Hall T; Oshiro S; Kaneko S; Ikemoto Y; Jull G
Man Ther; 2011 Apr; 16(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 21055995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical segmental motion induced by shoulder abduction assessed by magnetic resonance imaging.
Takasaki H; Hall T; Kaneko S; Iizawa T; Ikemoto Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb; 34(3):E122-6. PubMed ID: 19179912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Functional MR imaging of the craniocervical junction. Correlation with alar ligaments and occipito-atlantoaxial joint morphology: a study in 50 asymptomatic subjects.
Pfirrmann CW; Binkert CA; Zanetti M; Boos N; Hodler J
Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 2000 May; 130(18):645-51. PubMed ID: 10846756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Manual fixation versus locking during upper cervical segmental mobilization. Part 2: an in vitro three-dimensional arthrokinematic analysis of manual axial rotation and lateral bending mobilization of the atlanto-axial joint.
Cattrysse E; Baeyens JP; Clarys JP; Van Roy P
Man Ther; 2007 Nov; 12(4):353-62. PubMed ID: 17189711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical evaluation of occipitocervicothoracic fusion: impact of partial or sequential fixation.
Cheng BC; Hafez MA; Cunningham B; Serhan H; Welch WC
Spine J; 2008; 8(5):821-6. PubMed ID: 17981098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Construct validity of clinical tests for alar ligament integrity: an evaluation using magnetic resonance imaging.
Osmotherly PG; Rivett DA; Rowe LJ
Phys Ther; 2012 May; 92(5):718-25. PubMed ID: 22267548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vivo three-dimensional kinematics of the cervical spine during maximal axial rotation.
Salem W; Lenders C; Mathieu J; Hermanus N; Klein P
Man Ther; 2013 Aug; 18(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 23375147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Kinematics of the upper cervical spine in rotation: in vivo three-dimensional analysis.
Ishii T; Mukai Y; Hosono N; Sakaura H; Nakajima Y; Sato Y; Sugamoto K; Yoshikawa H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Apr; 29(7):E139-44. PubMed ID: 15087810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [In vivo measurement of three-dimensional motion of the upper cervical spine using CT three-dimensional reconstruction].
Zhai X; Kang J; Chen X; Dong J; Qiu XW; Ding XA; Liu J; He XJ
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2019 Jul; 32(7):658-665. PubMed ID: 31382726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intertester reliability and diagnostic validity of the cervical flexion-rotation test.
Hall TM; Robinson KW; Fujinawa O; Akasaka K; Pyne EA
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2008 May; 31(4):293-300. PubMed ID: 18486750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Normal cervical spine range of motion in children 3-12 years old.
Arbogast KB; Gholve PA; Friedman JE; Maltese MR; Tomasello MF; Dormans JP
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):E309-15. PubMed ID: 17471079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Motion compensation associated with single-level cervical fusion: where does the lost motion go?
Schwab JS; Diangelo DJ; Foley KT
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Oct; 31(21):2439-48. PubMed ID: 17023853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A 3D kinematic method for evaluating voluntary movements of the cervical spine in humans.
Bulgheroni MV; Antonaci F; Ghirmai S; Sandrini G; Nappi G; Pedotti A
Funct Neurol; 1998; 13(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 9800151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of the cervical range of motion over time, differences between results of the Flock of Birds and the EDI-320: a comparison between an electromagnetic tracking system and an electronic inclinometer.
Assink N; Bergman GJ; Knoester B; Winters JC; Dijkstra PU
Man Ther; 2008 Oct; 13(5):450-5. PubMed ID: 17681865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics.
Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Dooris A; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):E794-9. PubMed ID: 19829242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Neck motion due to the halo-vest in prone and supine positions.
Ivancic PC; Telles CJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 May; 35(10):E400-6. PubMed ID: 20118835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical analysis comparing three C1-C2 transarticular screw salvaging fixation techniques.
Elgafy H; Potluri T; Goel VK; Foster S; Faizan A; Kulkarni N
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Feb; 35(4):378-85. PubMed ID: 20081561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervical segmental motion at levels adjacent to disc herniation as determined with kinetic magnetic resonance imaging.
Daffner SD; Xin J; Taghavi CE; Hymanson HJ; Mudiyam C; Hongyu W; Wang JC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):2389-94. PubMed ID: 19829252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The C0-C2 axial rotation test: normal values, intra- and inter-rater reliability and correlation with the flexion rotation test in normal subjects.
Satpute K; Nalband S; Hall T
J Man Manip Ther; 2019 May; 27(2):92-98. PubMed ID: 30935342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of cranio-cervical posture on three-dimensional motion of the cervical spine.
Edmondston SJ; Henne SE; Loh W; Ostvold E
Man Ther; 2005 Feb; 10(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 15681268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
