BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

58 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21056337)

  • 1. Age and prevalence of cervical carcinoma in subsequent hysterectomy following a conization procedure questioned.
    Tsai HJ
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Sep; 49(3):394. PubMed ID: 21056337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Age and prevalence of cervical carcinoma in subsequent hysterectomy following a conization procedure.
    Wun TH; Chiu WW; Wang CB; Tseng CC; Chen CH; Lin YH; Lee CY; Sun YL; Tseng CJ
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Sep; 48(3):254-7. PubMed ID: 19797015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Risk factors of predicting residual disease in women with stage I a1 squamous cervical carcinoma after conization].
    Zhu XE; Feng Y; Fu YF; Cheng XD; Chen XD; Xie X; Lü WG
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Feb; 93(7):534-6. PubMed ID: 23660325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Re: "Pathologic risk factors for predicting residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy following LEEP conization".
    Verguts J; Schockaert S; Moerman P; Poppe W
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jul; 106(1):273. PubMed ID: 17477960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of residual neoplasia based on histopathology and margin status of conization specimens.
    Chang DY; Cheng WF; Torng PL; Chen RJ; Huang SC
    Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Oct; 63(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8898168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Treatment of carcinoma in situ of the cervix experience at the Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo.
    Souen JS; Carvalho JP; Filassi JR; Marques JA; Ades A; Pinotti JA
    Rev Paul Med; 1992; 110(6):276-9. PubMed ID: 1341025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix.
    Muntz HG; Bell DA; Lage JM; Goff BA; Feldman S; Rice LW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Dec; 80(6):935-9. PubMed ID: 1448263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: a metaanalysis of 1278 patients evaluating the predictive value of conization margin status.
    Salani R; Puri I; Bristow RE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 200(2):182.e1-5. PubMed ID: 19019325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Colposcopy, conization, and hysterectomy practices: a current perspective.
    Benedet JL; Anderson GH; Simpson ML; Shaw D
    Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Nov; 60(5):539-45. PubMed ID: 7145247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinicopathologic features of early adenocarcinoma of the cervix initially managed with cervical conization.
    Poynor EA; Marshall D; Sonoda Y; Slomovitz BM; Barakat RR; Soslow RA
    Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Dec; 103(3):960-5. PubMed ID: 16860853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Endocervical curettage, cone margins, and residual adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix.
    Denehy TR; Gregori CA; Breen JL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jul; 90(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 9207802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Management and follow-up of patients with adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix.
    Poynor EA; Barakat RR; Hoskins WJ
    Gynecol Oncol; 1995 May; 57(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 7729727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: an experience with 100 cases.
    Ostör AG; Duncan A; Quinn M; Rome R
    Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Nov; 79(2):207-10. PubMed ID: 11063645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: management and outcome.
    Widrich T; Kennedy AW; Myers TM; Hart WR; Wirth S
    Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Jun; 61(3):304-8. PubMed ID: 8641606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A study of diagnostic failure of loop conization in microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix.
    Tseng CJ; Liang CC; Lin CT; Huang KG; Chou HH; Chang TC; Lai CH; Soong YK; Hsueh S
    Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Apr; 73(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 10094886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Analysis of 194 conizations: residual lesions require hysterectomy].
    Clemente Pérez PA; Castán Mateo S; González Ramos P; Pérez Falo A; Suárez Trujillo J; Martínez Tejero A; de la Plaza MA
    Rev Esp Oncol; 1985; 32(4):699-707. PubMed ID: 3880167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Cervical pathology: significance and therapeutic impact of margin status].
    Michy T; Leveque J; Loussouarn D; Dravet F; Dejode M; Sagan C; Descamps P; Classe JM
    Bull Cancer; 2008 Dec; 95(12):1171-5. PubMed ID: 19091650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Our experience with indications to hysterectomy after conization in precancerous conditions and carcinoma of the uterine cervix].
    Andrýs J; Rosol M; Havel V; Kopecný J
    Sb Ved Pr Lek Fak Karlovy Univerzity Hradci Kralove Suppl; 1973 Feb; 15():Suppl 2:129-35. PubMed ID: 4520476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cervical adenocarcinoma in situ: the predictive value of conization margin status.
    Young JL; Jazaeri AA; Lachance JA; Stoler MH; Irvin WP; Rice LW; Andersen WA; Modesitt SC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 197(2):195.e1-7; discussion 195.e7-8. PubMed ID: 17689647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cytology of uterine cervical verrucous carcinoma.
    Kanamori T
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 47(3):367-9. PubMed ID: 18936012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.