339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2105750)
21. [Comparison of the physical parameters and handling properties of short-duration and middle-duration absorbable suture materials].
Thiede A; Stüwe W; Lünstedt B
Chirurg; 1985 Dec; 56(12):803-8. PubMed ID: 3002727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Polydioxanon (PDS)--a new monofilar synthetic, absorbable suture material. Tensile strength studies in a controlled clinical trial on the large intestine of humans and physical parameters in in vitro tests].
Lündstedt B; Thiede A
Chirurg; 1983 Feb; 54(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 6406180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Abdominal wound closure. A comparison of polydioxanone, polypropylene, and Teflon-coated braided Dacron sutures.
Kon ND; Meredith JW; Poole GV; Martin MB; Kawamoto E; Myers RT
Am Surg; 1984 Oct; 50(10):549-51. PubMed ID: 6237599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison between absorbable and nonabsorbable, monofilament sutures for end-to-end arterial anastomoses in growing pigs.
Steen S; Andersson L; Löwenhielm P; Stridbeck H; Walther B; Holmin T
Surgery; 1984 Feb; 95(2):202-8. PubMed ID: 6420918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Mechanical comparison of 10 suture materials before and after in vivo incubation.
Greenwald D; Shumway S; Albear P; Gottlieb L
J Surg Res; 1994 Apr; 56(4):372-7. PubMed ID: 8152233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Quantitative evaluation of stiffness of commercial suture materials.
Chu CC; Kizil Z
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Mar; 168(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 2919353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A new synthetic monofilament absorbable suture made from polytrimethylene carbonate.
Katz AR; Mukherjee DP; Kaganov AL; Gordon S
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1985 Sep; 161(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 3898441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Why make monofilament sutures out of polyvinylidene fluoride?
Urban E; King MW; Guidoin R; Laroche G; Marois Y; Martin L; Cardou A; Douville Y
ASAIO J; 1994; 40(2):145-56. PubMed ID: 8003751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of strength properties of poly-L/D-lactide (PLDLA) 96/4 and polyglyconate (Maxon) sutures: in vitro, in the subcutis, and in the achilles tendon of rabbits.
Kangas J; Paasimaa S; Mäkelä P; Leppilahti J; Törmälä P; Waris T; Ashammakhi N
J Biomed Mater Res; 2001; 58(1):121-6. PubMed ID: 11153008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Studies on the efficacy and safety of polydioxanone monofilament absorbable suture.
Lerwick E
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1983 Jan; 156(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 6401197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Tissue reactions to absorbable ligating clips.
Chegini N; von Fraunhofer JA; Hay DL; Masterson BJ
J Reprod Med; 1988 Feb; 33(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 3127584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Use of absorbable suture material in dermatologic surgery].
Breuninger H; Haueisen S
Z Hautkr; 1985 Mar; 60(5):453-7. PubMed ID: 3922138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A comparative scanning electron microscopic study on degradation of absorbable ligating clips in vivo and in vitro.
Chegini N; Hay DL; von Fraunhofer JA; Masterson BJ
J Biomed Mater Res; 1988 Jan; 22(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 3125183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of two suture materials, Dexon Plus and Maxon, in abdominal hysterectomy.
Kiilholma P; Mäkinen J; Tenho T; Pitkänen Y; Hirvonen T
Ann Chir Gynaecol Suppl; 1994; 208():47-9. PubMed ID: 8092771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Plasma surface modification of synthetic absorbable sutures.
Loh IH; Lin HL; Chu CC
J Appl Biomater; 1992; 3(2):131-46. PubMed ID: 10147710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Torsion of monofilament and polyfilament sutures under tension decreases suture strength and increases risk of suture fracture.
Hennessey DB; Carey E; Simms CK; Hanly A; Winter DC
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Aug; 12():168-73. PubMed ID: 22762905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Experimental study in the urinary tract of a new smooth surface absorbable synthetic monofilament (author's transl)].
Beurton D; Gonties D; Terdjman S; Abraham SH; Dana A
J Urol (Paris); 1981; 87(5):295-303. PubMed ID: 6792291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of the tensile strengths of four monofilament absorbable suture materials after immersion in canine urine with or without bacteria.
Greenberg CB; Davidson EB; Bellmer DD; Morton RJ; Payton ME
Am J Vet Res; 2004 Jun; 65(6):847-53. PubMed ID: 15198227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The properties of damaged and undamaged suture used in metal and bioabsorbable anchors: an in vitro study.
Wright PB; Budoff JE; Yeh ML; Kelm ZS; Luo ZP
Arthroscopy; 2007 Jun; 23(6):655-61. PubMed ID: 17560481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Optimal suture materials for contaminated gastrointestinal surgery: does infection influence the decrease of the tensile strength of sutures?
Tanaka Y; Sadahiro S; Ishikawa K; Suzuki T; Kamijo A; Tazume S; Yasuda M
Surg Today; 2012 Dec; 42(12):1170-5. PubMed ID: 22218873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
