339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2105750)
41. The hydrolytic degradation of polydioxanone (PDSII) sutures. Part I: Morphological aspects.
Ping Ooi C; Cameron RE
J Biomed Mater Res; 2002; 63(3):280-90. PubMed ID: 12115759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Species-dependent premature degradation of absorbable suture materials caused by infection--impact on the choice of thread in vascular surgery.
Larena-Avellaneda A; Debus ES; Diener H; Dietz UA; Franke S; Thiedel A
Vasa; 2004 Aug; 33(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 15461069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. 9-O monofilament polydioxanone (PDS): a new synthetic absorbable suture for cataract wound closure.
Blaydes JE; Werblin TP
Ophthalmic Surg; 1982 Aug; 13(8):644-6. PubMed ID: 6813786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Electrospinning polydioxanone for biomedical applications.
Boland ED; Coleman BD; Barnes CP; Simpson DG; Wnek GE; Bowlin GL
Acta Biomater; 2005 Jan; 1(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 16701785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Effect of human pancreatic juice and bile on the tensile strength of suture materials.
Muftuoglu MA; Ozkan E; Saglam A
Am J Surg; 2004 Aug; 188(2):200-3. PubMed ID: 15249253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Optimum suture material for locking technique in tendon repair: effects of suture friction in mobilization.
Yamagami N; Mori R; Yotsumoto T; Hatanaka H; Uchio Y
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Jun; 26(5):529-34. PubMed ID: 21342739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. In vitro comparison of mechanical and degradation properties of equivalent absorbable suture materials from two different manufacturers.
de la Puerta B; Parsons KJ; Draper ER; Moores AL; Moores AP
Vet Surg; 2011 Feb; 40(2):223-7. PubMed ID: 21223313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [Growth of the aortic anastomosis in puppies--comparison of monofilament suture materials, whether absorbable or nonabsorbable, and of suture techniques, whether continuous or interrupted].
Nakashima S; Sugimoto H; Inoue M; Karashima S; Onitsuka T; Koga Y
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 Feb; 92(2):206-13. PubMed ID: 1903833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Effect of re-sterilization of surgical sutures by ethylene oxide.
Nagaraja PA; Shetty D
ANZ J Surg; 2007; 77(1-2):80-3. PubMed ID: 17295827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Growth of the aortic anastomosis in pigs. Comparison of continuous absorbable suture with nonabsorbable suture.
Chiu IS; Hung CR; Chao SF; Huang SH; How SW
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1988 Jan; 95(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 3275836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The resistance of absorbable sutures in fetal tissue and fluids.
Aktuğ T
Turk J Pediatr; 1989; 31(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 2518585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Breaking strength and elasticity of synthetic absorbable suture materials incubated in phosphate-buffered saline solution, milk, and milk contaminated with Streptococcus agalactiae.
Nichols S; Anderson DE
Am J Vet Res; 2007 Apr; 68(4):441-5. PubMed ID: 17397302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Duration of wound healing and tissue resistance as important criteria for selecting suture materials in colon surgery].
Lünstedt B; Debus S
Chirurg; 1990 Oct; 61(10):717-9. PubMed ID: 2276302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Macroscopic and histologic tissue reaction to polydioxanone, a new, synthetic, monofilament microsuture.
Laufer N; Merino M; Trietsch HG; DeCherney AH
J Reprod Med; 1984 May; 29(5):307-10. PubMed ID: 6427459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The use of a new suture material (Polydioxanone) in the biliary tract.
Hoile RW
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1983 May; 65(3):168-71. PubMed ID: 6407382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Locking mechanism strength of absorbable ligating devices.
Hay DL; von Fraunhofer JA; Chegini N; Masterson BJ
J Biomed Mater Res; 1988 Mar; 22(3):179-90. PubMed ID: 3360813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Mechanical performance of monofilament synthetic absorbable sutures.
Rodeheaver GT; Powell TA; Thacker JG; Edlich RF
Am J Surg; 1987 Nov; 154(5):544-7. PubMed ID: 3118727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Two-month longitudinal study of mechanical properties of absorbable sutures used in orthopedic surgery.
Müller DA; Snedeker JG; Meyer DC
J Orthop Surg Res; 2016 Oct; 11(1):111. PubMed ID: 27729082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A new suture material for hypospadias surgery: a comparative study.
Guarino N; Vallasciani SA; Marrocco G
J Urol; 2009 Mar; 181(3):1318-22; discussion 1322-3. PubMed ID: 19157423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The hydrolytic degradation of polydioxanone (PDSII) sutures. Part II: Micromechanisms of deformation.
Ping Ooi C; Cameron RE
J Biomed Mater Res; 2002; 63(3):291-8. PubMed ID: 12115760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
