BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21058107)

  • 1. Viewpoints on the FDA draft adaptive designs guidance from the PhRMA working group.
    Gallo P; Anderson K; Chuang-Stein C; Dragalin V; Gaydos B; Krams M; Pinheiro J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Nov; 20(6):1115-24. PubMed ID: 21058107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. FDA draft guidance on adaptive design clinical trials: Pfizer's perspective.
    Chuang-Stein C; Beltangady M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Nov; 20(6):1143-9. PubMed ID: 21058110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Understanding the FDA guidance on adaptive designs: historical, legal, and statistical perspectives.
    Liu Q; Chi GY
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Nov; 20(6):1178-219. PubMed ID: 21058114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comments on the FDA draft guidance on adaptive designs.
    Wittes J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Nov; 20(6):1166-70. PubMed ID: 21058112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Introduction to discussion papers on draft FDA guidance on adaptive designs.
    Chang M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Nov; 20(6):1113-4. PubMed ID: 21058106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adaptive designs in clinical drug development--an Executive Summary of the PhRMA Working Group.
    Gallo P; Chuang-Stein C; Dragalin V; Gaydos B; Krams M; Pinheiro J;
    J Biopharm Stat; 2006 May; 16(3):275-83; discussion 285-91, 293-8, 311-2. PubMed ID: 16724485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On flexibility of adaptive designs and criteria for choosing a good one--a discussion of FDA draft guidance.
    Cheng B; Chow SC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Nov; 20(6):1171-7. PubMed ID: 21058113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Review of draft FDA adaptive design guidance.
    Cook T; DeMets DL
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Nov; 20(6):1132-42. PubMed ID: 21058109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adaptive methods: telling "the rest of the story".
    Emerson SS; Fleming TR
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Nov; 20(6):1150-65. PubMed ID: 21058111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A note on special articles on adaptive clinical trial designs.
    Chow SC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Nov; 20(6):1088-9. PubMed ID: 21058103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Editorial: Adaptive designs: appealing in development of therapeutics, and where do controversies lie?
    Wang SJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Nov; 20(6):1083-7. PubMed ID: 21058102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Note on special technical issue on adaptive designs for clinical trials.
    Liu Q; Chang M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):615-6. PubMed ID: 22651104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Innovative approaches for designing and analyzing adaptive dose-ranging trials.
    Bornkamp B; Bretz F; Dmitrienko A; Enas G; Gaydos B; Hsu CH; König F; Krams M; Liu Q; Neuenschwander B; Parke T; Pinheiro J; Roy A; Sax R; Shen F
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(6):965-95. PubMed ID: 18027208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comments on the draft guidance on "adaptive design clinical trials for drugs and biologics" of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
    Brannath W; Burger HU; Glimm E; Stallard N; Vandemeulebroecke M; Wassmer G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Nov; 20(6):1125-31. PubMed ID: 21058108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Discussion of the "White Paper of the PhRMA Working Group on adaptive dose-ranging designs".
    Grieve AP
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(6):997-1004; discussion 1029-32. PubMed ID: 18027209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient-reported outcomes: assessment and current perspectives of the guidelines of the Food and Drug Administration and the reflection paper of the European Medicines Agency.
    Bottomley A; Jones D; Claassens L
    Eur J Cancer; 2009 Feb; 45(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 19013787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adaptive design in clinical research: issues, opportunities, and recommendations.
    Chang M; Chow SC; Pong A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2006 May; 16(3):299-309; discussion 311-2. PubMed ID: 16724486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adaptive design clinical trials and trial logistics models in CNS drug development.
    Wang SJ; Hung HM; O'Neill R
    Eur Neuropsychopharmacol; 2011 Feb; 21(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 20933373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Progress report on the guidance for industry for statistical aspects of the design, analysis, and interpretation of chronic rodent carcinogenicity studies of pharmaceuticals.
    Lin KK
    J Biopharm Stat; 2000 Nov; 10(4):481-501. PubMed ID: 11104389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adaptive designs in clinical drug development: opportunities, challenges, and scope reflections following PhRMA's November 2006 workshop.
    Krams M; Burman CF; Dragalin V; Gaydos B; Grieve AP; Pinheiro J; Maurer W; Gallo P
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(6):957-64. PubMed ID: 18027207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.