261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21058156)
1. Side-by-side comparison of field monitoring methods for hot bitumen emission exposures: the German IFA Method 6305, U.S. NIOSH Method 5042, and the Total Organic Matter Method.
Kriech AJ; Emmel C; Osborn LV; Breuer D; Redman AP; Hoeber D; Bochmann F; Ruehl R
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Dec; 7(12):712-25. PubMed ID: 21058156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Air sampling methodology for asphalt fume in asphalt production and asphalt roofing manufacturing facilities: total particulate sampler versus inhalable particulate sampler.
Calzavara TS; Carter CM; Axten C
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 May; 18(5):358-67. PubMed ID: 12746079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Field sampling investigations within the road paving industry.
Deygout F; Le Coutaller P
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Feb; 7(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 19953414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantification of Total Particulate Matter and Benzene-Soluble Fraction Inhalation Exposures in Roofing Workers Performing Tear-off Activities.
Hill RH; Ferraro JR; Dodson JL; Hockman EL; McGovern AE; Fayerweather WE
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12(7):450-7. PubMed ID: 26083058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of sampling methods for monomer and polyisocyanates of 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate during spray finishing operations.
England E; Key-Schwartz R; Lesage J; Carlton G; Streicher R; Song R
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2000 Jun; 15(6):472-8. PubMed ID: 10853287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vapours and aerosols of bitumen: exposure data obtained by the German Bitumen Forum.
Rühl R; Musanke U; Kolmsee K; Priess R; Zoubek G; Breuer D
Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Jul; 50(5):459-68. PubMed ID: 16501002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Total versus inhalable sampler comparison study for the determination of asphalt fume exposures within the road paving industry.
Kriech AJ; Osborn LV; Wissel HL; Kurek JT; Sweeney BJ; Peregrine CJ
J Environ Monit; 2004 Oct; 6(10):827-33. PubMed ID: 15480497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Exposures to inhalable and "total" oil mist aerosol by metal machining shop workers.
Wilsey PW; Vincent JH; Bishop MJ; Brosseau LM; Greaves IA
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1996 Dec; 57(12):1149-53. PubMed ID: 8976589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Collection, validation and generation of bitumen fumes for inhalation studies in rats Part 1: Workplace samples and validation criteria.
Preiss A; Koch W; Kock H; Elend M; Raabe M; Pohlmann G
Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Nov; 50(8):789-804. PubMed ID: 16840433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Personal sampling for inhalable aerosol exposures of carbon black manufacturing industry workers.
Kerr SM; Muranko HJ; Vincent JH
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Oct; 17(10):681-92. PubMed ID: 12363209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Exposure to metalworking fluid aerosols and determinants of exposure.
Lillienberg L; Burdorf A; Mathiasson L; Thörneby L
Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Oct; 52(7):597-605. PubMed ID: 18664515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of a direct-reading device to gravimetric methods for evaluating organic dust aerosols in an enclosed swine production environment.
Taylor CD; Reynolds SJ
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Jan; 16(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 11202031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Workplace aerosol mass concentration measurement using optical particle counters.
Görner P; Simon X; Bémer D; Lidén G
J Environ Monit; 2012 Feb; 14(2):420-8. PubMed ID: 22009365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intersampler field comparison of Respicon(R), IOM, and closed-face 25-mm personal aerosol samplers during primary production of aluminium.
Skaugset NP; Ellingsen DG; Notø H; Jordbekken L; Thomassen Y
Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Oct; 57(8):1054-64. PubMed ID: 23792971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sampling and Analysis of Bitumen Fumes: Comparison of German and French Methods to Determine a Conversion Formula.
Sutter B; Pelletier E; Blaskowitz M; Ravera C; Stolze C; Reim C; Langlois E; Breuer D
Ann Work Expo Health; 2018 Jul; 62(6):721-732. PubMed ID: 29985976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Asphalt fume exposure levels in North American asphalt production and roofing manufacturing operations.
Axten CW; Fayerweather WE; Trumbore DC; Mueller DJ; Sampson AF
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2012; 9(3):172-84. PubMed ID: 22404576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Field precision of formaldehyde sampling and analysis using NIOSH method 3500.
Akbar-Khanzadeh F; Park CK
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1997 Sep; 58(9):657-60. PubMed ID: 9291564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of methods for personal sampling of inhalable and total lead and cadmium-containing aerosols in a primary lead smelter.
Spear TM; Werner MA; Bootland J; Harbour A; Murray EP; Rossi R; Vincent JH
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1997 Dec; 58(12):893-9. PubMed ID: 9425651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative exposure matrix for asphalt fume, total particulate matter, and respirable crystalline silica among roofing and asphalt manufacturing workers.
Fayerweather WE; Trumbore DC; Johnson KA; Niebo RW; Maxim LD
Inhal Toxicol; 2011 Sep; 23(11):668-79. PubMed ID: 21879950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
