156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21058874)
1. Response-time tests of logical-rule models of categorization.
Little DR; Nosofsky RM; Denton SE
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 21058874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Logical rules and the classification of integral-dimension stimuli.
Little DR; Nosofsky RM; Donkin C; Denton SE
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):801-20. PubMed ID: 22905932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Logical-rule models of classification response times: a synthesis of mental-architecture, random-walk, and decision-bound approaches.
Fific M; Little DR; Nosofsky RM
Psychol Rev; 2010 Apr; 117(2):309-48. PubMed ID: 20438229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Numerical predictions for serial, parallel, and coactive logical rule-based models of categorization response time.
Little DR
Behav Res Methods; 2012 Dec; 44(4):1148-56. PubMed ID: 22528957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Event-related potentials reveal the relations between feature representations at different levels of abstraction.
Hannah SD; Shedden JM; Brooks LR; Grundy JG
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016 Nov; 69(11):2166-88. PubMed ID: 26513169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Selecting a response in task switching: testing a model of compound cue retrieval.
Schneider DW; Logan GD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):122-36. PubMed ID: 19210085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Extremely selective attention: eye-tracking studies of the dynamic allocation of attention to stimulus features in categorization.
Blair MR; Watson MR; Walshe RC; Maj F
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1196-206. PubMed ID: 19686015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evidence that within-dimension features are generally processed coactively.
Blunden AG; Howe PDL; Little DR
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jan; 82(1):193-227. PubMed ID: 31254263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can we perceive two colors at the same time? A direct test of Huang and Pashler's (2007) Boolean map theory of visual attention.
Fitousi D
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1532-1550. PubMed ID: 30684206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rules and exemplars in categorization, identification, and recognition.
Nosofsky RM; Clark SE; Shin HJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Mar; 15(2):282-304. PubMed ID: 2522517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Information-processing architectures in multidimensional classification: a validation test of the systems factorial technology.
Fific M; Nosofsky RM; Townsend JT
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):356-75. PubMed ID: 18377176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Integrality/separability of stimulus dimensions and multidimensional generalization in pigeons.
Soto FA; Wasserman EA
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Apr; 36(2):194-205. PubMed ID: 20384400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Exemplar similarity and rule application.
Hahn U; Prat-Sala M; Pothos EM; Brumby DP
Cognition; 2010 Jan; 114(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 19815187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Masked priming effect reflects evidence accumulated by the prime.
Kinoshita S; Norris D
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):194-204. PubMed ID: 19591077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perceptual discrimination in static and dynamic noise: the temporal relation between perceptual encoding and decision making.
Ratcliff R; Smith PL
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 Feb; 139(1):70-94. PubMed ID: 20121313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Frequency Shifts and Depth Dependence of Premotor Beta Band Activity during Perceptual Decision-Making.
Chandrasekaran C; Bray IE; Shenoy KV
J Neurosci; 2019 Feb; 39(8):1420-1435. PubMed ID: 30606756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice.
Krajbich I; Armel C; Rangel A
Nat Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 13(10):1292-8. PubMed ID: 20835253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Composite faces are not (necessarily) processed coactively: A test using systems factorial technology and logical-rule models.
Cheng XJ; McCarthy CJ; Wang TSL; Palmeri TJ; Little DR
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jun; 44(6):833-862. PubMed ID: 29683707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Generalization of feature- and rule-based learning in the categorization of dimensional stimuli: evidence for dual processes under cognitive control.
Natal SD; McLaren IP; Livesey EJ
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Apr; 39(2):140-51. PubMed ID: 23421398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Resolving task rule incongruence during task switching by competitor rule suppression.
Meiran N; Hsieh S; Dimov E
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):992-1002. PubMed ID: 20565214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
